Re: [PATCH RESEND] PCI/AER: Use a common function to print AER error bits

["Alex G." <mr.nuke.me@gmail.com>]

On 04/30/2018 12:15 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 28, 2018 at 12:07:48PM -0500, Alex G. wrote:

(snip)
>> I could update the offending line to say:
>>  +	info.first_error = PCI_ERR_CAP_FEP(aer->cap_control);
> 
> That's what I would have expected.  So I'd say either do this, or add
> a comment about why it's not the right thing to do.

Okay.

>> Though I still have the concerns with validating CPER data:
>>
>>> I can see a way to use even more common printk code, but that requires
>>> validating the PCI regs we get from firmware. That means we need to make
>>> a guarantee about CPER that is beyond the scope of this patch.
> 
> Sounds like this is material for another patch, but if/when you do
> that, I'd like to understand your concern about validating the
> registers we get from firmware.  Are you worried about getting
> incorrect register contents, then printing the wrong info, making
> the wrong decision about how to recover, something else?

I don't trust firmware, and I have daymares about firmware leaving these
fields uninitialized. In jargon, I'd like to treat it as external
untrusted serialized data.

Alex