From: Vidya Sagar <vidyas@nvidia.com>
To: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Cc: Jingoo Han <jingoohan1@gmail.com>,
Gustavo Pimentel <gustavo.pimentel@synopsys.com>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
"Andrew Murray" <amurray@thegoodpenguin.co.uk>,
Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>,
Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>,
PCI <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<kthota@nvidia.com>,
Manikanta Maddireddy <mmaddireddy@nvidia.com>,
<sagar.tv@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 2/2] PCI: dwc: Add support to configure for ECRC
Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2020 19:57:09 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <902c0445-9fed-8e61-3aba-0e87988eb8df@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAL_Jsq+3Ek9SRbsTqEmjiZtszvi7Er=TNgOt8t=0OESva2=sTg@mail.gmail.com>
On 11/2/2020 7:45 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
> External email: Use caution opening links or attachments
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 12:40 AM Vidya Sagar <vidyas@nvidia.com> wrote:
>>
>> DesignWare core has a TLP digest (TD) override bit in one of the control
>> registers of ATU. This bit also needs to be programmed for proper ECRC
>> functionality. This is currently identified as an issue with DesignWare
>> IP version 4.90a. This patch does the required programming in ATU upon
>> querying the system policy for ECRC.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Vidya Sagar <vidyas@nvidia.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Jingoo Han <jingoohan1@gmail.com>
>> ---
>> V3:
>> * Added 'Reviewed-by: Jingoo Han <jingoohan1@gmail.com>'
>>
>> V2:
>> * Addressed Jingoo's review comment
>> * Removed saving 'td' bit information in 'dw_pcie' structure
>>
>> drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.c | 8 ++++++--
>> drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.h | 1 +
>> 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.c
>> index b5e438b70cd5..cbd651b219d2 100644
>> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.c
>> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.c
>> @@ -246,6 +246,8 @@ static void dw_pcie_prog_outbound_atu_unroll(struct dw_pcie *pci, u8 func_no,
>> dw_pcie_writel_ob_unroll(pci, index, PCIE_ATU_UNR_UPPER_TARGET,
>> upper_32_bits(pci_addr));
>> val = type | PCIE_ATU_FUNC_NUM(func_no);
>> + if (pci->version == 0x490A)
>> + val = val | pcie_is_ecrc_enabled() << PCIE_ATU_TD_SHIFT;
>> val = upper_32_bits(size - 1) ?
>> val | PCIE_ATU_INCREASE_REGION_SIZE : val;
>> dw_pcie_writel_ob_unroll(pci, index, PCIE_ATU_UNR_REGION_CTRL1, val);
>> @@ -294,8 +296,10 @@ static void __dw_pcie_prog_outbound_atu(struct dw_pcie *pci, u8 func_no,
>> lower_32_bits(pci_addr));
>> dw_pcie_writel_dbi(pci, PCIE_ATU_UPPER_TARGET,
>> upper_32_bits(pci_addr));
>> - dw_pcie_writel_dbi(pci, PCIE_ATU_CR1, type |
>> - PCIE_ATU_FUNC_NUM(func_no));
>> + val = type | PCIE_ATU_FUNC_NUM(func_no);
>> + if (pci->version == 0x490A)
>
> Is this even possible? Are the non-unroll ATU registers available post 4.80?
I'm not sure. Gustavo might have information about this. I made this
change so that it is taken care off even if they available.
>
> Rob
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-11-02 14:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-10-29 5:39 [PATCH V3 0/2] Add support to configure DWC for ECRC Vidya Sagar
2020-10-29 5:39 ` [PATCH V3 1/2] PCI/AER: Add pcie_is_ecrc_enabled() API Vidya Sagar
2020-10-29 5:39 ` [PATCH V3 2/2] PCI: dwc: Add support to configure for ECRC Vidya Sagar
2020-10-29 22:03 ` Jingoo Han
2020-10-30 6:45 ` Vidya Sagar
2020-11-02 14:15 ` Rob Herring
2020-11-02 14:27 ` Vidya Sagar [this message]
2020-11-02 15:11 ` Gustavo Pimentel
2020-11-02 21:16 ` Rob Herring
2020-11-02 22:38 ` Gustavo Pimentel
2020-11-03 19:48 ` Rob Herring
2020-11-02 23:02 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2020-11-03 3:27 ` Vidya Sagar
2020-11-03 21:07 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2020-11-04 11:43 ` Vidya Sagar
2020-11-04 16:22 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2020-11-04 17:40 ` Vidya Sagar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=902c0445-9fed-8e61-3aba-0e87988eb8df@nvidia.com \
--to=vidyas@nvidia.com \
--cc=amurray@thegoodpenguin.co.uk \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=gustavo.pimentel@synopsys.com \
--cc=jingoohan1@gmail.com \
--cc=jonathanh@nvidia.com \
--cc=kthota@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
--cc=mmaddireddy@nvidia.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sagar.tv@gmail.com \
--cc=treding@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox