Linux PCI subsystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kumar Gala <galak@codeaurora.org>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org>,
	Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@arm.com>,
	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	Rob Herring <robherring2@gmail.com>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>, Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@arm.com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk>,
	"devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@ti.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] pci: Add IORESOURCE_BIT entry for PCIe ECAM resources.
Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2014 15:43:02 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <95C66A63-9671-4AD5-9804-6647A305DB99@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4495090.ktpdXEyibD@wuerfel>


On Jun 2, 2014, at 2:15 PM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote:

> On Monday 02 June 2014 13:09:08 Kumar Gala wrote:
>>> However, what do we do with the 2 cases that exist in upstream that
>>>> are using ranges for cfg space?
>>> 
>>> Ignore them in the core code? Make the specific host controller handle
>>> them I would think.
>> 
>> I just meant, should we ‘break’ their DTs and move them from using ranges to reg?
> 
> dw-pcie is used on a lot of systems, I think we should make the common
> part of that driver always handle config space in a common way, and
> move out the part that parses the ranges property into the individual
> soc-specific glue drivers that want to keep optional backwards compatibility
> with existing dtbs.
> 
> Which one is the other driver?
> 
> 	Arnd

Its imx6 and exynos, havent looked to see if dw-pcie is handling the parsing or not for them.

- k

-- 
Employee of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation


  reply	other threads:[~2014-06-02 20:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-05-29 16:03 [PATCH] of: treat PCI config space as IORESOURCE_MEM type Kumar Gala
2014-05-29 20:44 ` Rob Herring
2014-05-29 20:51   ` Kumar Gala
2014-05-29 21:50     ` Rob Herring
2014-05-30  0:56     ` Liviu Dudau
2014-05-30  1:29       ` Bjorn Helgaas
2014-05-30  1:41         ` Liviu Dudau
2014-05-30 20:37           ` Jason Gunthorpe
2014-05-30 20:44             ` Kumar Gala
2014-05-30 20:45           ` Kumar Gala
2014-05-30 23:11             ` Liviu Dudau
2014-05-30 23:16               ` Bjorn Helgaas
2014-05-30 23:30                 ` Liviu Dudau
2014-05-31  0:36                   ` Liviu Dudau
2014-05-31  0:36                     ` [PATCH 1/2] pci: Add IORESOURCE_BIT entry for PCIe ECAM resources Liviu Dudau
2014-05-31 18:41                       ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-06-01 11:26                         ` Liviu Dudau
2014-06-02 15:09                         ` Grant Likely
2014-06-02 15:40                           ` Kumar Gala
2014-06-02 16:23                             ` Grant Likely
2014-06-02 18:09                               ` Kumar Gala
2014-06-02 19:15                                 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-06-02 20:43                                   ` Kumar Gala [this message]
2014-06-02 20:44                                     ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-06-03  8:44                                 ` Grant Likely
2014-06-03  9:21                                   ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-06-03 11:38                                     ` Grant Likely
2014-05-31  0:36                     ` [PATCH 2/2] of: treat PCI config space as IORESOURCE_MEM type with special flags Liviu Dudau

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=95C66A63-9671-4AD5-9804-6647A305DB99@codeaurora.org \
    --to=galak@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=Liviu.Dudau@arm.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=grant.likely@linaro.org \
    --cc=ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk \
    --cc=kishon@ti.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=pawel.moll@arm.com \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=robherring2@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox