From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Return-Path: Subject: Re: [Linaro-acpi] ACPI namespace details for ARM64 To: Al Stone , Bjorn Helgaas , linux-pci@vger.kernel.org References: <20161109220506.GN14322@bhelgaas-glaptop.roam.corp.google.com> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Al Stone , Robert Richter , Gabriele Paoloni , Arnd Bergmann , Ard Biesheuvel , Jon Masters , linaro-acpi@lists.linaro.org, "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Don Dutile , Christopher Covington , Tomasz Nowicki From: Sinan Kaya Message-ID: <98c9564d-17f9-f549-6dd4-5c6abc1ba1a3@codeaurora.org> Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2016 09:24:28 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 List-ID: On 11/10/2016 6:18 PM, Al Stone wrote: > On 11/09/2016 03:05 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> We've been working through the details of getting ACPI to work on >> arm64, and there have been lots of questions about what this means for >> PCI. I've outlined this for several people individually, but I'm >> going to send this separately, apart from a specific patch series, to >> make sure we're all on the same page. Please correct my errors and >> misunderstandings. >> >> Bjorn >> >> [snip....] > > A big +1 to all of this. This also looks like something that should > be added to either PCI, ACPI or arm64 documentation (or even all three). > What do you think? I agree. In order to have compliant systems, we have to make PNP0C02 required in the PCIe appendix of the SBSA specification. > > Thank you for putting this together, Bjorn. > > -- Sinan Kaya Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. as an affiliate of Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.