From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.1 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DAC2C43461 for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2020 13:12:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA43A208DB for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2020 13:12:07 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="lBT/TEIo" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726591AbgINNMB (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Sep 2020 09:12:01 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:54014 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726299AbgINNLZ (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Sep 2020 09:11:25 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-x444.google.com (mail-wr1-x444.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::444]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D5810C06174A; Mon, 14 Sep 2020 06:11:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wr1-x444.google.com with SMTP id x14so18638390wrl.12; Mon, 14 Sep 2020 06:11:24 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=9w3sxxj8pSXMWFjqFI11OsxhpoFFNgS3AccbtAl9K1M=; b=lBT/TEIoVFDPRE5LwTVY/VpAg2giTJNs4JR7ctTfRE1fCQmUZXODK+A2klNxsJhbwR m9NC+xn8xfAqF4J5rMCWADG08i1mY7wpdcnPMLMKEBuTVZF4dAzSMkG40HYKngprFpSs fDBHbBw4eiddbMeHOZX9207boj7dTc0D5ErsiWBslRM7+JMaFOxmksFe/phZI072dX29 2pZZLE1jUyORQkqa6pEfBwjtA2xpfN6ouZqbgA3S9VJlbrcyBvW/YZVLwWcDc0YWZaV9 vo8Ox5rSwCDom5JJX69nSnfMH6vNRGWGUheLbCbnyESqoz/rOOyuKmg4xZ4sPULfrWNI ALVQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=9w3sxxj8pSXMWFjqFI11OsxhpoFFNgS3AccbtAl9K1M=; b=DS/sZ/76+RPDC7iEhzZFM2W8RFQvhhyusxYvg8ry6VVlk66N/WfAGiuNIR2xlKE9WV /JLXiMsUvM3GWJcbDSz3xAL2AAxor+zrp/3KPaU60VJBGyr1lPbVVzqV5d08r583oBCv Yz4Wz4lPKeRXaiT0tK68aN8/+ndZ/HJVJzCbXY5imDa0LV5VBLCZd3rmXH1EwXMeoHZx K2PXagMzMfzqHgVx5NsX3Opm/tkJRlt9IUSZMZdRO79iPTYk5xvn4KxzrazU2xGKJ7JR qiLHxTsR2D2olDN0JibYWC3NW0va4rFXBv5tSv3HQiCdr+ZIqXHLuzf4B4tnl4ezcoRD 4shw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531ZgpcVgNr4LQT1KphqeQ5iX20lcRFAk5bB+bRrOojbwLCLtx/S wF6ySv7DxTNYHj6BeL56Iwj+/l5wcBgVHQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzSLIDDoxmjCP7UlhRP0PsUbCmacVeAoUB2b/QALbpC2eIxxdOx01zPUhBWyQo8GwEN91CDPA== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6000:11cd:: with SMTP id i13mr15276243wrx.140.1600089083213; Mon, 14 Sep 2020 06:11:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ziggy.stardust ([213.195.113.201]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id i16sm20417229wrq.73.2020.09.14.06.11.22 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 14 Sep 2020 06:11:22 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: make linux-mediatek list remarks consistent To: Lukas Bulwahn Cc: Ryder Lee , Bjorn Helgaas , linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, Ralf Ramsauer , Pia Eichinger , Joe Perches , kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20200914053110.23286-1-lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com> From: Matthias Brugger Message-ID: <9c5aaa15-bdd8-ae4f-0642-092566ab08ba@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2020 15:11:21 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.12.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-pci-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org On 14/09/2020 12:20, Lukas Bulwahn wrote: > > > On Mon, 14 Sep 2020, Matthias Brugger wrote: > >> >> >> On 14/09/2020 07:31, Lukas Bulwahn wrote: >>> Commit 637cfacae96f ("PCI: mediatek: Add MediaTek PCIe host controller >>> support") does not mention that linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org is >>> moderated for non-subscribers, but the other eight entries for >>> linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org do. >>> >>> Adjust this entry to be consistent with all others. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Lukas Bulwahn >> >> Maybe rephrase the commit message to something like: >> "Mark linux-mediatek@lists.infraded.org as moderated for the MediaTek PCIe >> host controller entry, as the list actually is moderated." >> >> Anyway: >> Reviewed-by: Matthias Brugger >> >>> --- >>> applies cleanly on v5.9-rc5 and next-20200911 >>> >>> Ryder, please ack. >>> >>> Bjorn, Matthias, please pick this minor non-urgent clean-up patch. >>> >>> This patch submission will also show me if linux-mediatek is moderated or >>> not. I have not subscribed to linux-mediatek and if it shows up quickly in >>> the archive, the list is probably not moderated; and if it takes longer, it >>> is moderated, and hence, validating the patch. >> >> I can affirm the list is moderated :) >> > > Hmm, do we mean the same "moderation" here? > > I believe a mailing list with the remark "moderated for non-subscribers" > means that a mail from an address that has not subscribed to the mailing > list is put on hold and needs to be manually permitted to be seen on the > mailing list. > > Matthias, is that also your understanding of "moderated for > non-subscribers" for your Reviewed-by tag? Yes. > > I am not subscribed to linux-mediatek. When I sent an email to the list, > it showed up really seconds later in the lore.kernel.org of the > linux-mediatek public-inbox repository. So, either it was delivered > quickly as it is not moderated or my check with lore.kernel.org is wrong, > e.g., mails show up in the lore.kernel.org archive, even they were not > yet permitted on the actual list. > I'm the moderator and I get requests to moderate emails. I suppose I added you to the accepted list because of earlier emails you send. Regards, Matthias