From: Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, Timur Tabi <timur@codeaurora.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 2/4] PCI: Factor out pci_bus_wait_crs()
Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2017 09:53:56 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9cb3006d-31d0-e57a-fd3e-c32914e8ba42@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170818213210.15145.15340.stgit@bhelgaas-glaptop.roam.corp.google.com>
On 8/18/2017 5:32 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> + if ((*l & 0xffff) != 0x0001)
> + return true; /* not a CRS completion */
>
This version certainly looks cleaner. However, it breaks pci_flr_wait().
If some root port doesn't support CRS and returns 0xFFFFFFFF, pci_bus_wait_crs()
function returns true. pci_flr_wait() prematurely bails out from here.
pci_flr_wait()
{
+ ret = pci_bus_wait_crs(dev->bus, dev->devfn, &id, 60000);
+ if (ret)
+ return;
}
We can change the return code to false above but then we break pci_bus_read_dev_vendor_id()
function.
That's why, I was interested in creating a pci_bus_crs_visibility_supported() helper
function that would check for the magic 0x0001 value and return true. Otherwise, false.
pci_bus_read_dev_vendor_id() would do this
pci_bus_read_dev_vendor_id()
{
...
if (pci_bus_crs_visibility_supported())
return pci_bus_wait_crs(dev->bus, dev->devfn, &id, 60000);
return true
}
Similar pattern for pci_flr_wait().
--
Sinan Kaya
Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. as an affiliate of Qualcomm Technologies, Inc.
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-08-21 13:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-08-18 21:31 [PATCH v11 0/4] PCI: Use CRS Software Visibility to wait for device to become ready Bjorn Helgaas
2017-08-18 21:32 ` [PATCH v11 1/4] PCI: Don't ignore valid response before CRS timeout Bjorn Helgaas
2017-08-21 14:02 ` Sinan Kaya
2017-08-21 17:44 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2017-08-18 21:32 ` [PATCH v11 2/4] PCI: Factor out pci_bus_wait_crs() Bjorn Helgaas
2017-08-21 13:53 ` Sinan Kaya [this message]
2017-08-21 19:18 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2017-08-21 19:37 ` Sinan Kaya
2017-08-21 20:23 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2017-08-21 20:32 ` Sinan Kaya
2017-08-21 21:09 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2017-08-23 4:40 ` Sinan Kaya
2017-08-18 21:32 ` [PATCH v11 3/4] PCI: Handle CRS ("device not ready") returned by device after FLR Bjorn Helgaas
2017-08-18 21:32 ` [PATCH v11 4/4] PCI: Warn periodically while waiting for device to become ready Bjorn Helgaas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9cb3006d-31d0-e57a-fd3e-c32914e8ba42@codeaurora.org \
--to=okaya@codeaurora.org \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=timur@codeaurora.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).