From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-la0-f52.google.com ([209.85.215.52]:51268 "EHLO mail-la0-f52.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753206Ab3ACPBU (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Jan 2013 10:01:20 -0500 Received: by mail-la0-f52.google.com with SMTP id fq12so8064368lab.11 for ; Thu, 03 Jan 2013 07:01:18 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20130103143931.GA28451@avionic-0098.adnet.avionic-design.de> References: <1354917879-32073-1-git-send-email-thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com> <20130103143931.GA28451@avionic-0098.adnet.avionic-design.de> From: Bjorn Helgaas Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2013 08:00:58 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [RFC v1] PCIe support for the Armada 370 and Armada XP SoCs To: Thierry Reding Cc: Thomas Petazzoni , Jason Cooper , Andrew Lunn , Gregory Clement , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Stephen Warren , Lior Amsalem , Maen Suleiman , Tawfik Bayouk , Shadi Ammouri , Eran Ben-Avi , Yehuda Yitschak , Nadav Haklai , Arnd Bergmann , Rob Herring , Jason Gunthorpe , linux-pci@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-pci-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 7:39 AM, Thierry Reding wrote: > Hi everyone, > > Thomas' RFC series incited me to put in some more work on the Tegra PCIe > controller driver. This in turn brought up an old issue: should we move > PCIe controller drivers to some central location rather than keeping > them in machine-specific directories? Last time I brought this up there > was no consensus but I really think there's some value in keeping these > drivers in a common location, especially now that a few people are > starting to work on similar problems. It may also provide some more > momentum to get the various DT implementations factored out of various > architectures. > > Stephen proposed drivers/pci/host on IRC and I second that. > > Bjorn, is this something you would be on board with? Sounds fine to me.