From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-ob0-f179.google.com ([209.85.214.179]:55552 "EHLO mail-ob0-f179.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755323Ab3EUR2v (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 May 2013 13:28:51 -0400 Received: by mail-ob0-f179.google.com with SMTP id wd20so1066236obb.38 for ; Tue, 21 May 2013 10:28:50 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1368768974.20726.1.camel@pasglop> References: <1367712653.11982.19.camel@pasglop> <1367712932.11982.20.camel@pasglop> <1367732090.11982.38.camel@pasglop> <1367740336.11982.41.camel@pasglop> <51871088.4594420a.0ccc.7300SMTPIN_ADDED_BROKEN@mx.google.com> <1367837311.15842.31.camel@pasglop> <5188b791.a110420a.0bea.077eSMTPIN_ADDED_BROKEN@mx.google.com> <1368768974.20726.1.camel@pasglop> From: Bjorn Helgaas Date: Tue, 21 May 2013 11:28:30 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Resource assignment oddities To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt Cc: Yinghai Lu , Gavin Shan , "linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-pci-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 11:36 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > On Tue, 2013-05-07 at 15:21 -0700, Yinghai Lu wrote: >> I just sent v3, please test that. >> >> That should be less invasive for v3.10. As it will skip adding failed >> resource to failed list when the resource is IORESOURCE_IO, and bus >> does not have IORESOURCE_IO. > > Any news about merging this ? I'm starting to look at this. Do you think this is v3.10 material? My first impression is that it seems pretty large for that. Bjorn