linux-pci.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
To: Yijing Wang <wangyijing0307@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Do we need acpiphp_sanitize_bus() in acpiphp?
Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2012 07:27:40 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAErSpo4nFeDPvWeWmbXgmiRKWDNaeA44uwFbOLOWUhi-gLp5ag@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <502BAEA5.5080505@gmail.com>

On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 7:13 AM, Yijing Wang <wangyijing0307@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>    I have some confusion on acpiphp_sanitize_bus() functions.If I understand wrong about this, correct me,thanks your help.
>    I think there are three problems in this function:
>    1、Use list_for_each_entry here is not safe, because pci_stop_and_remove_bus_device() will remove the device from bus.
>    2、If assign resources fail after hot-add a device, the resource will reset to zero, in reset_resource(), res->start = 0,
>       res->end =0, res->end = 0.
>    3、I think leave the fail pci devices in the system is better rather than remove them, so we can see all pci devices
>       by lspci after hot-add, what about your opinion?

These sound like reasonable concerns.  The best thing to do is to
propose patches (separate ones for each logical issue).  Then we can
review a concrete change and apply it if appropriate.

> /*
>  * Remove devices for which we could not assign resources, call
>  * arch specific code to fix-up the bus
>  */
> static void acpiphp_sanitize_bus(struct pci_bus *bus)
> {
>         struct pci_dev *dev;
>         int i;
>         unsigned long type_mask = IORESOURCE_IO | IORESOURCE_MEM;
>
>         list_for_each_entry(dev, &bus->devices, bus_list) {
>                 for (i=0; i<PCI_BRIDGE_RESOURCES; i++) {
>                         struct resource *res = &dev->resource[i];
>                         if ((res->flags & type_mask) && !res->start &&
>                                         res->end) {
>                                 /* Could not assign a required resources
>                                  * for this device, remove it */
>                                 pci_stop_and_remove_bus_device(dev);
>                                 break;
>                         }
>                 }
>         }
> }

  reply	other threads:[~2012-08-15 14:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-08-15 14:13 Do we need acpiphp_sanitize_bus() in acpiphp? Yijing Wang
2012-08-15 14:27 ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]
2012-08-15 14:52   ` Yijing Wang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAErSpo4nFeDPvWeWmbXgmiRKWDNaeA44uwFbOLOWUhi-gLp5ag@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=wangyijing0307@gmail.com \
    --cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).