linux-pci.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
To: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Cc: Taku Izumi <izumi.taku@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com>, x86 <x86@kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH part2 6/6] PCI: Claim hw/fw allocated resources in hot add path.
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2012 18:12:53 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAErSpo4wmnnFKZeY4XyZdmoOZeQz8sj-5VoAhGhCSqWTBi0GRw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1346622653-30741-7-git-send-email-yinghai@kernel.org>

On Sun, Sep 2, 2012 at 3:50 PM, Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> wrote:
> During testing remove/rescan root bus 00, found
> [  338.142574] bus: 'pci': really_probe: probing driver ata_piix with device 0000:00:01.1
> [  338.146788] ata_piix 0000:00:01.1: device not available (can't reserve [io  0x01f0-0x01f7])
> [  338.150565] ata_piix: probe of 0000:00:01.1 failed with error -22
>
> because that fixed resource is not claimed from
>         arch/x86/pci/i386.c::pcibios_allocate_resources()
> that is init path.
>
> Try to claim those resources, so on the remove/rescan will still use old
> resources.
>
> It is some kind honoring HW/FW setting in the registers during hot add.
> esp root-bus hot add is through acpi, BIOS have chance to set some register
> for us.
>
> -v2: add rom resource claiming.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
> ---
>  arch/x86/pci/i386.c |   28 +++++++++++++++++++++-------
>  drivers/pci/bus.c   |    2 ++
>  include/linux/pci.h |    1 +
>  3 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/pci/i386.c b/arch/x86/pci/i386.c
> index abf2a61..3cb7d66 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/pci/i386.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/pci/i386.c
> @@ -201,13 +201,15 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(pcibios_align_resource);
>   *         as well.
>   */
>
> -static void __init pcibios_allocate_bridge_resources(struct pci_dev *dev)
> +static void pcibios_allocate_bridge_resources(struct pci_dev *dev)

This patch has a little too much going on at the same time.  Can you
split the __init removal into its own patch so we can focus on what's
left by itself?

>  {
>         int idx;
>         struct resource *r;
>
>         for (idx = PCI_BRIDGE_RESOURCES; idx < PCI_NUM_RESOURCES; idx++) {
>                 r = &dev->resource[idx];
> +               if (r->parent)  /* Already allocated */
> +                       continue;

This is also a potentially interesting change that maybe should be in
its own patch.

>                 if (!r->flags)
>                         continue;
>                 if (!r->start || pci_claim_resource(dev, idx) < 0) {
> @@ -223,7 +225,7 @@ static void __init pcibios_allocate_bridge_resources(struct pci_dev *dev)
>         }
>  }
>
> -static void __init pcibios_allocate_bus_resources(struct pci_bus *bus)
> +static void pcibios_allocate_bus_resources(struct pci_bus *bus)
>  {
>         struct pci_bus *child;
>
> @@ -239,7 +241,7 @@ struct pci_check_idx_range {
>         int end;
>  };
>
> -static void __init pcibios_allocate_dev_resources(struct pci_dev *dev, int pass)
> +static void pcibios_allocate_dev_resources(struct pci_dev *dev, int pass)
>  {
>         int idx, disabled, i;
>         u16 command;
> @@ -292,7 +294,7 @@ static void __init pcibios_allocate_dev_resources(struct pci_dev *dev, int pass)
>         }
>  }
>
> -static void __init pcibios_allocate_resources(struct pci_bus *bus, int pass)
> +static void pcibios_allocate_resources(struct pci_bus *bus, int pass)
>  {
>         struct pci_dev *dev;
>         struct pci_bus *child;
> @@ -306,7 +308,7 @@ static void __init pcibios_allocate_resources(struct pci_bus *bus, int pass)
>         }
>  }
>
> -static void __init pcibios_allocate_dev_rom_resource(struct pci_dev *dev)
> +static void pcibios_allocate_dev_rom_resource(struct pci_dev *dev)
>  {
>         struct resource *r;
>
> @@ -324,7 +326,7 @@ static void __init pcibios_allocate_dev_rom_resource(struct pci_dev *dev)
>                 r->start = 0;
>         }
>  }
> -static void __init __pcibios_allocate_rom_resources(struct pci_bus *bus)
> +static void __pcibios_allocate_rom_resources(struct pci_bus *bus)
>  {
>         struct pci_dev *dev;
>         struct pci_bus *child;
> @@ -337,7 +339,7 @@ static void __init __pcibios_allocate_rom_resources(struct pci_bus *bus)
>                         __pcibios_allocate_rom_resources(child);
>         }
>  }
> -static void __init pcibios_allocate_rom_resources(struct pci_bus *bus)
> +static void pcibios_allocate_rom_resources(struct pci_bus *bus)
>  {
>         if (pci_probe & PCI_ASSIGN_ROMS)
>                 return;
> @@ -358,6 +360,18 @@ static int __init pcibios_assign_resources(void)
>         return 0;
>  }
>
> +void pcibios_resource_survey_bus(struct pci_bus *bus)
> +{
> +       dev_printk(KERN_DEBUG, &bus->dev, "Allocating resources\n");
> +
> +       pcibios_allocate_bus_resources(bus);
> +
> +       pcibios_allocate_resources(bus, 0);
> +       pcibios_allocate_resources(bus, 1);
> +
> +       pcibios_allocate_rom_resources(bus);
> +}
> +
>  void __init pcibios_resource_survey(void)

I wish pcibios_resource_survey() could look like this:

    void __init pcibios_resource_survey(void)
    {
        list_for_each_entry(bus, &pci_root_buses, node)
            pcibios_resource_survey_bus(bus)

        e820_reserve_resources_late();
        ...

but maybe there's a reason why pcibios_allocate_rom_resources() really
has to be in the pcibios_assign_resources() fs_initcall rather than in
pcibios_resource_survey().

>  {
>         struct pci_bus *bus;
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/bus.c b/drivers/pci/bus.c
> index 4b0970b..2882d01 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/bus.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/bus.c
> @@ -154,6 +154,8 @@ pci_bus_alloc_resource(struct pci_bus *bus, struct resource *res,
>         return ret;
>  }
>
> +void __weak pcibios_resource_survey_bus(struct pci_bus *bus) { }
> +
>  /**
>   * pci_bus_add_device - add a single device
>   * @dev: device to add
> diff --git a/include/linux/pci.h b/include/linux/pci.h
> index 1b460e1..29a4704 100644
> --- a/include/linux/pci.h
> +++ b/include/linux/pci.h
> @@ -676,6 +676,7 @@ extern struct list_head pci_root_buses;     /* list of all known PCI buses */
>  /* Some device drivers need know if pci is initiated */
>  extern int no_pci_devices(void);
>
> +void pcibios_resource_survey_bus(struct pci_bus *bus);
>  void pcibios_fixup_bus(struct pci_bus *);
>  int __must_check pcibios_enable_device(struct pci_dev *, int mask);
>  /* Architecture specific versions may override this (weak) */
> --
> 1.7.7
>

  reply	other threads:[~2012-09-18  0:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 60+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-09-02 21:50 [PATCH part2 0/6] PCI, x86: pci root bus hotplug support - part2 Yinghai Lu
2012-09-02 21:50 ` [PATCH part2 1/6] x86, PCI: Separate pcibios_allocate_bridge_resources() Yinghai Lu
2012-09-02 21:50 ` [PATCH part2 2/6] x86, PCI: Separate pcibios_allocate_dev_resources() Yinghai Lu
2012-09-02 21:50 ` [PATCH part2 3/6] x86, PCI: Let pcibios_allocate_bus_resources() take bus instead Yinghai Lu
2012-09-02 21:50 ` [PATCH part2 4/6] x86, PCI: Separate rom resource claim out Yinghai Lu
2012-09-17 23:38   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2012-09-18  3:18     ` Yinghai Lu
2012-09-02 21:50 ` [PATCH part2 5/6] PCI, x86: Add pcibios_fw_addr_done Yinghai Lu
2012-09-02 21:50 ` [PATCH part2 6/6] PCI: Claim hw/fw allocated resources in hot add path Yinghai Lu
2012-09-18  0:12   ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]
2012-09-18  4:44     ` Yinghai Lu
2012-09-18  5:36       ` Yinghai Lu
2012-09-19 18:54         ` [PATCH 00/40] PCI, ACPI, x86: pci root bus hotplug support Yinghai Lu
2012-09-19 18:54           ` [PATCH 01/40] PCI: fix default vga ref_count Yinghai Lu
2012-09-21 20:52             ` Bjorn Helgaas
2012-09-21 21:18               ` Yinghai Lu
2012-09-23 15:25             ` Jiang Liu
2012-09-19 18:54           ` [PATCH 02/40] PCI, x86: clear initial value for root info resources Yinghai Lu
2012-09-19 18:54           ` [PATCH 03/40] PCI, ia64: " Yinghai Lu
2012-09-19 18:54           ` [PATCH 04/40] PCI, acpiphp: Add is_hotplug_bridge detection Yinghai Lu
2012-09-19 18:54           ` [PATCH 05/40] PCI: Add root bus children dev's res to fail list Yinghai Lu
2012-09-19 18:54           ` [PATCH 06/40] PCI: Split out stop_bus_device and remove_bus_dev again Yinghai Lu
2012-09-19 18:54           ` [PATCH 07/40] x86, PCI: Separate pcibios_allocate_bridge_resources() Yinghai Lu
2012-09-19 18:54           ` [PATCH 08/40] x86, PCI: Separate pcibios_allocate_dev_resources() Yinghai Lu
2012-09-19 18:54           ` [PATCH 09/40] x86, PCI: Let pcibios_allocate_bus_resources() take bus instead Yinghai Lu
2012-09-19 18:54           ` [PATCH 10/40] x86, PCI: Separate rom resource claim out Yinghai Lu
2012-09-19 18:54           ` [PATCH 11/40] PCI, x86: Add pcibios_fw_addr_done Yinghai Lu
2012-09-19 18:54           ` [PATCH 12/40] PCI, x86: Remove __init for hw/fw allocated functions Yinghai Lu
2012-09-19 18:54           ` [PATCH 13/40] PCI: Claim hw/fw allocated resources in hot add path Yinghai Lu
2012-09-19 18:54           ` [PATCH 14/40] PCI: Separate out pci_assign_unassigned_bus_resources() Yinghai Lu
2012-09-19 18:54           ` [PATCH 15/40] PCI: Move back pci_rescan_bus() to probe.c Yinghai Lu
2012-09-19 18:54           ` [PATCH 16/40] PCI: pci_bus_size_bridges() should not size own bridge Yinghai Lu
2012-09-19 18:54           ` [PATCH 17/40] PCI: Use __pci_bus_size_bridges() directly in pci_assign_unassigned_bus_resources() Yinghai Lu
2012-09-19 18:54           ` [PATCH 18/40] PCI: Rescan bus using callback method too Yinghai Lu
2012-09-19 18:54           ` [PATCH 19/40] PCI, sysfs: Clean up rescan/remove with schedule_callback Yinghai Lu
2012-09-19 18:54           ` [PATCH 20/40] PCI: Fix a device reference count leakage issue in pci_dev_present() Yinghai Lu
2012-09-19 18:54           ` [PATCH 21/40] PCI: Add pci_stop_and_remove_root_bus() Yinghai Lu
2012-09-19 18:54           ` [PATCH 22/40] PCI, acpiphp: Separate out hot-add support of pci host bridge Yinghai Lu
2012-10-12 10:36             ` Tang Chen
2012-09-19 18:54           ` [PATCH 23/40] PCI, ACPI: Pass device instead of handle when config root bridge Yinghai Lu
2012-09-19 18:54           ` [PATCH 24/40] PCI, acpi: Update acpi_pci_driver add/remove interface Yinghai Lu
2012-09-19 18:54           ` [PATCH 25/40] PCI, ACPI: Make acpi_pci_root_remove remove pci root bus too Yinghai Lu
2012-09-19 18:54           ` [PATCH 26/40] PCI, ACPI: del root bus prt Yinghai Lu
2012-09-19 18:54           ` [PATCH 27/40] ACPI: acpi_bus_trim to support two steps Yinghai Lu
2012-09-19 18:54           ` [PATCH 28/40] PCI, ACPI: Add pci_root_hp hot removal notification support Yinghai Lu
2012-09-19 18:54           ` [PATCH 29/40] PCI, ACPI: Add alloc_acpi_hp_work() Yinghai Lu
2012-09-19 18:54           ` [PATCH 30/40] PCI, acpiphp: Use acpi_hp_work Yinghai Lu
2012-09-19 18:54           ` [PATCH 31/40] PCI, pci_root_hp: " Yinghai Lu
2012-09-19 18:54           ` [PATCH 32/40] PCI, ACPI: Make kacpi_hotplug_wq static Yinghai Lu
2012-09-19 18:54           ` [PATCH 33/40] ACPI, PCI: Use normal list for struct acpi_pci_driver Yinghai Lu
2012-09-19 18:54           ` [PATCH 34/40] ACPI, PCI: Notify acpi_pci_drivers when hot-plugging PCI root bridges Yinghai Lu
2012-09-19 18:54           ` [PATCH 35/40] ACPI, PCI: Protect global lists in drivers/acpi/pci_root.c Yinghai Lu
2012-09-19 18:54           ` [PATCH 36/40] PCI: Set dev_node early for pci_dev Yinghai Lu
2012-09-19 18:54           ` [PATCH 37/40] PCI, x86: Move pci_enable_bridges() down Yinghai Lu
2012-09-19 18:54           ` [PATCH 38/40] ACPI, PCI: Skip extra pci_enable_bridges for non hot-add root Yinghai Lu
2012-09-19 18:54           ` [PATCH 39/40] PCI, acpiphp: Don't ailout even no slots found yet Yinghai Lu
2012-09-19 18:54           ` [PATCH 40/40] ACPI: Enable SCI_EMULATE to manually simulate physical hotplug testing Yinghai Lu
2012-10-17  7:50           ` [PATCH 00/40] PCI, ACPI, x86: pci root bus hotplug support Yijing Wang
2012-10-17 16:19             ` Yinghai Lu
2012-10-18  0:51               ` Yijing Wang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAErSpo4wmnnFKZeY4XyZdmoOZeQz8sj-5VoAhGhCSqWTBi0GRw@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=izumi.taku@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=jiang.liu@huawei.com \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).