linux-pci.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
To: Bert Karwatzki <spasswolf@web.de>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	"Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
	"Mario Limonciello (AMD) (kernel.org)" <superm1@kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-next@vger.kernel.org,
	regressions@lists.linux.dev, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
	"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
	acpica-devel@lists.linux.dev,
	"Robert Moore" <robert.moore@intel.com>,
	"Saket Dumbre" <saket.dumbre@intel.com>
Subject: Re: Crash during resume of pcie bridge due to infinite loop in ACPICA
Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2025 14:02:36 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0i2T7HpV4jN6NJk=ruBvjecPRU2PyuYf0_TSPQU6FZ5rg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8273a7755f90a3e41782f1d820dd9f0c22be78b7.camel@web.de>

On Thu, Nov 27, 2025 at 1:08 AM Bert Karwatzki <spasswolf@web.de> wrote:
>
> Am Dienstag, dem 25.11.2025 um 20:46 +0100 schrieb Rafael J. Wysocki:
> >
> >
> > What may be happening, but this is just a theory, is that the
> > interpreter aborts the evaluation of a method due to an internal
> > timeout, essentially the control_state->control.loop_timeout check in
> > acpi_ds_exec_end_control_op() and that leads to a subsequent hard
> > failure like a deadlock.
> >
> > This may be tested by increasing the ACPI_MAX_LOOP_TIMEOUT value, but
> > I'm not sure it's practical to try that.
>
> I don't think this the case here because ACPI_MAX_LOOP_TIMEOUT defaults to
> 30s and the walk loop until the crash only lasts ~2s.

I see, thanks!

  reply	other threads:[~2025-11-27 13:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-10-06 12:09 [REGRESSION 00/04] Crash during resume of pcie bridge Bert Karwatzki
2025-10-06 12:09 ` [REGRESSION 01/04] " Bert Karwatzki
2025-10-06 12:09 ` [REGRESSION 02/04] " Bert Karwatzki
2025-10-06 12:09 ` [REGRESSION 03/04] " Bert Karwatzki
2025-10-06 12:09 ` [REGRESSION 04/04] " Bert Karwatzki
2025-10-06 12:39 ` [REGRESSION 00/04] " Christian König
2025-10-06 16:22   ` Bert Karwatzki
2025-10-07  6:50     ` Bert Karwatzki
2025-10-07 21:33 ` Mario Limonciello
2025-10-13 16:29   ` Bert Karwatzki
2025-10-13 18:51     ` Mario Limonciello
2025-10-14 10:50       ` Christian König
     [not found]         ` <1853e2af7f70cf726df278137b6d2d89d9d9dc82.camel@web.de>
2025-10-31 13:38           ` Bert Karwatzki
2025-10-31 13:47             ` Bert Karwatzki
2025-10-31 18:35               ` Bert Karwatzki
2025-11-05 11:44                 ` Bert Karwatzki
2025-11-05 21:31                   ` Mario Limonciello (AMD) (kernel.org)
2025-11-07 13:09                     ` Bert Karwatzki
2025-11-07 17:09                       ` Bert Karwatzki
2025-11-10 13:33                         ` Christian König
2025-11-16 21:08                           ` Crash during resume of pcie bridge due to infinite loop in ACPICA Bert Karwatzki
2025-11-17 16:40                             ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-11-24 22:34                               ` Bert Karwatzki
2025-11-25 19:46                                 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-11-27  0:08                                   ` Bert Karwatzki
2025-11-27 13:02                                     ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2025-11-28 20:47                                       ` Bert Karwatzki
2025-12-02 18:59                                         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-12-02 19:53                                           ` Bert Karwatzki
2025-12-02 20:01                                             ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-12-05 10:05                                               ` Crash during resume of pcie bridge due to incorrect error handling Bert Karwatzki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAJZ5v0i2T7HpV4jN6NJk=ruBvjecPRU2PyuYf0_TSPQU6FZ5rg@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=acpica-devel@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
    --cc=regressions@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=robert.moore@intel.com \
    --cc=saket.dumbre@intel.com \
    --cc=spasswolf@web.de \
    --cc=superm1@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).