From: Myron Stowe <myron.stowe@gmail.com>
To: Myron Stowe <myron.stowe@redhat.com>
Cc: megaraidlinux@lsi.com, JBottomley@parallels.com,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] [SCSI] megaraid: Remove local (struct pci_dev) pdev's
Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2013 13:46:23 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAL-B5D0e6+HoQOa7zfM4kSZACtj7ajPmCsW6kbDcNUZ5kLASyw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130607162329.11205.95093.stgit@amt.stowe>
Bump. Any comments?
I think there is a real issue here so I'd like some confirmation on
that at least.
On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 10:23 AM, Myron Stowe <myron.stowe@redhat.com> wrote:
> While the megaraid device itself may be 64-bit DMA capable, 32-bit address
> restricted DMA buffers are apparently required for "internal commands" as
> is denoted by a couple of comments - "For all internal commands, the
> buffer must be allocated in <4GB address range" - within the driver.
>
> If the device is 64-bit DMA capable then, once it is setup, any subsequent
> DMA allocations for "internal commands" would not be properly restricted
> due to megaraid_probe_one() having called pci_set_dma_mask() on pdev with
> DMA_BIT_MASK(64). The driver attempts to solve this by using
> make_local_pdev() to dynamically create local pci_dev structures which are
> then set and used for allocating 32-bit address space restricted DMA
> buffers[1] but I don't believe that the implementation works as intended.
>
>
> Assume that the megaraid device is 64-bit DMA capable. While probing the
> device and attaching the megaraid driver, pci_set_dma_mask() is called
> with the "originating pdev" and a DMA_BIT_MASK of 64. As a result, any
> subsequent dynamic DMA related allocations associated with the
> "originating pdev" will acquire 64-bit based buffers, which do not meet
> the addressing restrictions for internal commands.
>
> megaraid_probe_one(struct pci_dev *pdev, ...)
> ...
> pci_set_dma_mask(pdev, DMA_BIT_MASK(64));
>
> As mentioned, the driver attempts to solve this by using make_local_pdev()
> to dynamically create local pci_dev structures - "local pdev's" - which
> are set with a DMA_BIT_MASK of 32.
>
> make_local_pdev
> alloc_pci_dev
> memcpy
> pci_set_dma_mask
> dma_set_mask
> *dev->dma_mask = mask;
>
> The "local pdev" is then used in allocating a DMA buffer in an attempt to
> meet the < 4 GB restriction.
>
> For a 64-bit DMA capable device, the "originating pdev" will have its
> 'dma_mask' set to 0xffffffffffffffff after the driver attaches.
> Subsequently, when an internal command is initiated, make_local_pdev() is
> called. make_local_pdev() uses the PCI's core to allocate a "local pdev"
> and then copies the "originating pdev" content into the newly allocated
> "local pdev". As a result of copying the "originating pdev" content into
> the "local pdev", pdev->dev.dma_mask will be pointing back to the
> "originating pdev's" 'dma_mask' member, not the "local pdev's" as
> intended. Thus, when make_local_pdev() calls pci_set_dma_mask() in an
> attempt to set the "local pdev's" DMA mask to 32 it will instead overwrite
> the "originating pdev's" DMA mask. Thus, after any user initiated
> commands are issued, all subsequent DMA allocations will be 32-bit
> restricted from that point onward regardless of whether they are internal
> commands or otherwise.
>
>
> This patch fixes the issue by removing the setup of DMA_BIT_MASK to 64 in
> megaraid_probe_one(), leaving the driver with default 32-bit DMA
> capabilities, as it currently ends up in such a state anyway after any
> internal commands are initiated.
>
>
> [1] It seems strange that both mega_buffer/buf_dma_handle and
> make_local_pdev() both exist for internal commands but this has been
> the case for a long time - at least since 2.6.12-rc2. Perhaps there
> is some coalescing that could be done.
> ---
>
> Myron Stowe (3):
> [SCSI] megaraid: Remove 64-bit DMA related dead code
> [SCSI] megaraid: Remove local (struct pci_dev) pdev's
> [SCSI] megaraid: Remove 64-bit DMA_BIT_MASK capability
>
>
> drivers/scsi/megaraid.c | 152 ++++++++---------------------------------------
> drivers/scsi/megaraid.h | 1
> 2 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 126 deletions(-)
>
> --
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-06-17 19:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-06-07 16:23 [PATCH 0/3] [SCSI] megaraid: Remove local (struct pci_dev) pdev's Myron Stowe
2013-06-07 16:23 ` [PATCH 1/3] [SCSI] megaraid: Remove 64-bit DMA_BIT_MASK capability Myron Stowe
2013-06-07 16:23 ` [PATCH 2/3] [SCSI] megaraid: Remove local (struct pci_dev) pdev's Myron Stowe
2013-06-07 16:23 ` [PATCH 3/3] [SCSI] megaraid: Remove 64-bit DMA related dead code Myron Stowe
2013-06-17 19:46 ` Myron Stowe [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2013-07-09 20:39 [PATCH 0/3] [SCSI] megaraid: Remove local (struct pci_dev) pdev's Myron Stowe
2013-07-09 21:18 ` James Bottomley
2013-07-09 22:12 ` adam radford
2013-07-10 6:10 ` James Bottomley
2013-07-23 0:27 ` adam radford
2013-07-24 16:27 ` Myron Stowe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAL-B5D0e6+HoQOa7zfM4kSZACtj7ajPmCsW6kbDcNUZ5kLASyw@mail.gmail.com \
--to=myron.stowe@gmail.com \
--cc=JBottomley@parallels.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=megaraidlinux@lsi.com \
--cc=myron.stowe@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).