From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
To: "Ilpo Järvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, "Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
"Kai-Heng Feng" <kaihengf@nvidia.com>,
"Rob Herring" <robh@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Andy Shevchenko" <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
"Krzysztof Wilczyński" <kw@linux.com>,
Linux-Renesas <linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux-Renesas <linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.or>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] PCI & resource: Make coalescing host bridge windows safer
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2025 15:42:32 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAMuHMdVwAkC0XOU_SZ0HeH0+oT-j5SvKyRcFcJbbes624Yu9uQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251010144231.15773-1-ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
Hi Ilpo,
On Fri, 10 Oct 2025 at 16:42, Ilpo Järvinen
<ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> Here's a series for Geert to test if this fixes the improper coalescing
> of resources as was experienced with the pci_add_resource() change (I
> know the breaking change was pulled before 6.18 main PR but I'd want to
> retry it later once the known issues have been addressed). The expected
> result is there'll be two adjacent host bridge resources in the
> resource tree as the different name should disallow coalescing them
> together, and therefore BAR0 has a window into which it belongs to.
>
> Generic info for the series:
>
> PCI host bridge windows were coalesced in place into one of the structs
> on the resources list. The host bridge window coalescing code does not
> know who holds references and still needs the struct resource it's
> coalescing from/to so it is safer to perform coalescing into entirely
> a new struct resource instead and leave the old resource addresses as
> they were.
>
> The checks when coalescing is allowed are also made stricter so that
> only resources that have identical the metadata can be coalesced.
>
> As a bonus, there's also a bit of framework to easily create kunit
> tests for resource tree functions (beyond just resource_coalesce()).
>
> Ilpo Järvinen (3):
> PCI: Refactor host bridge window coalescing loop to use prev
> PCI: Do not coalesce host bridge resource structs in place
> resource, kunit: add test case for resource_coalesce()
Thanks for your series!
I have applied this on top of commit 06b77d5647a4d6a7 ("PCI:
Mark resources IORESOURCE_UNSET when outside bridge windows"), and
gave it a a try on Koelsch (R-Car M2-W).
Impact on dmesg (for the first PCI/USB) instance:
pci-rcar-gen2 ee090000.pci: host bridge /soc/pci@ee090000 ranges:
pci-rcar-gen2 ee090000.pci: MEM 0x00ee080000..0x00ee08ffff
-> 0x00ee080000
pci-rcar-gen2 ee090000.pci: PCI: revision 11
pci-rcar-gen2 ee090000.pci: PCI host bridge to bus 0000:00
pci_bus 0000:00: root bus resource [bus 00]
pci_bus 0000:00: root bus resource [mem 0xee080000-0xee08ffff]
pci 0000:00:00.0: [1033:0000] type 00 class 0x060000 conventional
PCI endpoint
-pci 0000:00:00.0: BAR 0 [mem 0xee090800-0xee090bff]: no initial
claim (no window)
pci 0000:00:00.0: BAR 0 [mem size 0x00000400]
-pci 0000:00:00.0: BAR 1 [mem 0x40000000-0x7fffffff pref]: no
initial claim (no window)
pci 0000:00:00.0: BAR 1 [mem size 0x40000000 pref]
pci 0000:00:01.0: [1033:0035] type 00 class 0x0c0310 conventional
PCI endpoint
-pci 0000:00:01.0: BAR 0 [mem 0x00000000-0x00000fff]: no initial
claim (no window)
pci 0000:00:01.0: BAR 0 [mem size 0x00001000]
pci 0000:00:01.0: supports D1 D2
pci 0000:00:01.0: PME# supported from D0 D1 D2 D3hot
pci 0000:00:02.0: [1033:00e0] type 00 class 0x0c0320 conventional
PCI endpoint
-pci 0000:00:02.0: BAR 0 [mem 0x00000000-0x000000ff]: no initial
claim (no window)
pci 0000:00:02.0: BAR 0 [mem size 0x00000100]
pci 0000:00:02.0: supports D1 D2
pci 0000:00:02.0: PME# supported from D0 D1 D2 D3hot
PCI: bus0: Fast back to back transfers disabled
pci 0000:00:01.0: BAR 0 [mem 0xee080000-0xee080fff]: assigned
pci 0000:00:02.0: BAR 0 [mem 0xee081000-0xee0810ff]: assigned
pci_bus 0000:00: resource 4 [mem 0xee080000-0xee08ffff]
pci 0000:00:01.0: enabling device (0140 -> 0142)
pci 0000:00:02.0: enabling device (0140 -> 0142)
I.e. the "no initial claim (no window)" messages introduced by commit
06b77d5647a4d6a7 are no longer seen.
The BARs still show "mem size <n>" instead of the "mem <start>-<end>"
before commit 06b77d5647a4d6a7, though.
This series has not impact on /proc/iomem, or on the output of
"lspci -v" (commit 06b77d5647a4d6a7 also had no impact here).
I.e. the part of /proc/iomem related to the first PCI/USB instance
still looks like:
ee080000-ee08ffff : pci@ee090000
ee080000-ee080fff : 0000:00:01.0
ee080000-ee080fff : ohci_hcd
ee081000-ee0810ff : 0000:00:02.0
ee081000-ee0810ff : ehci_hcd
ee090000-ee090bff : ee090000.pci pci@ee090000
I hope this matches your expectation.s
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-20 13:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-10 14:42 [PATCH 0/3] PCI & resource: Make coalescing host bridge windows safer Ilpo Järvinen
2025-10-10 14:42 ` [PATCH 1/3] PCI: Refactor host bridge window coalescing loop to use prev Ilpo Järvinen
2025-10-10 14:42 ` [PATCH 2/3] PCI: Do not coalesce host bridge resource structs in place Ilpo Järvinen
2025-10-15 14:29 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-10-20 17:21 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2025-10-20 17:44 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-10-20 18:15 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2025-10-20 18:30 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-10-10 14:42 ` [PATCH 3/3] resource, kunit: add test case for resource_coalesce() Ilpo Järvinen
2025-10-20 13:42 ` Geert Uytterhoeven [this message]
2025-10-20 16:20 ` [PATCH 0/3] PCI & resource: Make coalescing host bridge windows safer Ilpo Järvinen
2025-10-21 7:44 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2025-10-21 11:54 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2025-10-21 15:49 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-10-21 16:09 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2025-10-22 7:19 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2025-10-22 7:45 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2025-10-22 11:13 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2025-10-22 12:14 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2025-10-22 12:51 ` Rob Herring
2025-10-23 23:02 ` Bjorn Helgaas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAMuHMdVwAkC0XOU_SZ0HeH0+oT-j5SvKyRcFcJbbes624Yu9uQ@mail.gmail.com \
--to=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=kaihengf@nvidia.com \
--cc=kw@linux.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.or \
--cc=linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).