From: Jonathan Liu <net147@gmail.com>
To: Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org>
Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, rjw@rjwysocki.net,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
ravikanth.nalla@hpe.com, linux@rainbow-software.org,
timur@codeaurora.org, cov@codeaurora.org, jcm@redhat.com,
alex.williamson@redhat.com, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
Andy Gross <agross@codeaurora.org>,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, wim@djo.tudelft.nl,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
x86@kernel.org, Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
Robert Moore <robert.moore@intel.com>,
Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devel@acpica.org
Subject: Re: [V4,3/3] Revert "ACPI,PCI,IRQ: separate ISA penalty calculation"
Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2016 14:49:27 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CANwerB1LDgFFKDVBVf1eAo5713niEDchqQDHHxet-SuAPNPq7Q@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1476915664-27231-4-git-send-email-okaya@codeaurora.org>
On 20 October 2016 at 09:21, Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org> wrote:
> This reverts commit f7eca374f000 ("ACPI,PCI,IRQ: separate ISA penalty
> calculation") and commit 487cf917ed0d ("revert "ACPI, PCI, IRQ: remove
> redundant code in acpi_irq_penalty_init()"").
>
> Now that we understand the real issue (SCI and ISA penalty getting
> calculated before ACPI start), there is no need for special handling
> for ISA interrupts.
>
> Let's try to simplify the code one more time to share code.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org>
> ---
> arch/x86/pci/acpi.c | 1 -
> drivers/acpi/pci_link.c | 44 +++++---------------------------------------
> include/acpi/acpi_drivers.h | 1 -
> 3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/pci/acpi.c b/arch/x86/pci/acpi.c
> index 3cd6983..b2a4e2a 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/pci/acpi.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/pci/acpi.c
> @@ -396,7 +396,6 @@ int __init pci_acpi_init(void)
> return -ENODEV;
>
> printk(KERN_INFO "PCI: Using ACPI for IRQ routing\n");
> - acpi_irq_penalty_init();
> pcibios_enable_irq = acpi_pci_irq_enable;
> pcibios_disable_irq = acpi_pci_irq_disable;
> x86_init.pci.init_irq = x86_init_noop;
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c b/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c
> index 294b190..dd14d78 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c
> @@ -478,7 +478,8 @@ static int acpi_irq_pci_sharing_penalty(int irq)
> * If a link is active, penalize its IRQ heavily
> * so we try to choose a different IRQ.
> */
> - if (link->irq.active && link->irq.active == irq)
> + if ((link->irq.active && link->irq.active == irq) &&
> + (link->irq.initialized == 1))
> penalty += PIRQ_PENALTY_PCI_USING;
>
> /*
> @@ -501,45 +502,10 @@ static int acpi_irq_get_penalty(int irq)
> penalty += sci_penalty;
>
> if (irq < ACPI_MAX_ISA_IRQS)
> - return penalty + acpi_isa_irq_penalty[irq];
> + penalty += acpi_isa_irq_penalty[irq];
>
> - return penalty + acpi_irq_pci_sharing_penalty(irq);
> -}
> -
> -int __init acpi_irq_penalty_init(void)
> -{
> - struct acpi_pci_link *link;
> - int i;
> -
> - /*
> - * Update penalties to facilitate IRQ balancing.
> - */
> - list_for_each_entry(link, &acpi_link_list, list) {
> -
> - /*
> - * reflect the possible and active irqs in the penalty table --
> - * useful for breaking ties.
> - */
> - if (link->irq.possible_count) {
> - int penalty =
> - PIRQ_PENALTY_PCI_POSSIBLE /
> - link->irq.possible_count;
> -
> - for (i = 0; i < link->irq.possible_count; i++) {
> - if (link->irq.possible[i] < ACPI_MAX_ISA_IRQS)
> - acpi_isa_irq_penalty[link->irq.
> - possible[i]] +=
> - penalty;
> - }
> -
> - } else if (link->irq.active &&
> - (link->irq.active < ACPI_MAX_ISA_IRQS)) {
> - acpi_isa_irq_penalty[link->irq.active] +=
> - PIRQ_PENALTY_PCI_POSSIBLE;
> - }
> - }
> -
> - return 0;
> + penalty += acpi_irq_pci_sharing_penalty(irq);
> + return penalty;
> }
>
> static int acpi_irq_balance = -1; /* 0: static, 1: balance */
> diff --git a/include/acpi/acpi_drivers.h b/include/acpi/acpi_drivers.h
> index 29c6912..797ae2e 100644
> --- a/include/acpi/acpi_drivers.h
> +++ b/include/acpi/acpi_drivers.h
> @@ -78,7 +78,6 @@
>
> /* ACPI PCI Interrupt Link (pci_link.c) */
>
> -int acpi_irq_penalty_init(void);
> int acpi_pci_link_allocate_irq(acpi_handle handle, int index, int *triggering,
> int *polarity, char **name);
> int acpi_pci_link_free_irq(acpi_handle handle);
This series fixes one or more network adapters not working in Linux
32-bit x86 guest running inside VirtualBox if I have 4 network
adapters enabled. The following message no longer appears in the
kernel log:
ACPI: No IRQ available for PCI Interrupt Link [LNKD]. Try pci=noacpi or acpi=off
Tested-by: Jonathan Liu <net147@gmail.com>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-10-23 3:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-10-19 22:21 [PATCH V4 0/3] ACPI, PCI, IRQ: revert penalty calculation for ISA and SCI interrupts Sinan Kaya
2016-10-19 22:21 ` [PATCH V4 1/3] ACPI, PCI, IRQ: assign ISA IRQ directly during early boot stages Sinan Kaya
2016-10-20 21:39 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-10-24 3:48 ` Sinan Kaya
2016-10-21 1:39 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-10-21 14:07 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-10-24 3:22 ` Sinan Kaya
2016-10-23 3:48 ` [V4, " Jonathan Liu
2016-10-24 4:17 ` Sinan Kaya
2016-10-24 4:21 ` Jonathan Liu
2016-10-19 22:21 ` [PATCH V4 2/3] Revert "ACPI,PCI,IRQ: remove SCI penalize function" Sinan Kaya
2016-10-21 1:58 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-10-21 14:45 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-10-21 16:13 ` Sinan Kaya
2016-10-22 14:57 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-10-24 3:48 ` Sinan Kaya
2016-10-22 23:28 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-10-24 3:48 ` Sinan Kaya
2016-10-23 3:49 ` [V4,2/3] " Jonathan Liu
2016-10-19 22:21 ` [PATCH V4 3/3] Revert "ACPI, PCI, IRQ: separate ISA penalty calculation" Sinan Kaya
2016-10-21 2:31 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-10-21 2:58 ` Sinan Kaya
2016-10-22 23:59 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-10-24 4:16 ` Sinan Kaya
2016-10-23 3:49 ` Jonathan Liu [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CANwerB1LDgFFKDVBVf1eAo5713niEDchqQDHHxet-SuAPNPq7Q@mail.gmail.com \
--to=net147@gmail.com \
--cc=agross@codeaurora.org \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=cov@codeaurora.org \
--cc=devel@acpica.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jcm@redhat.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@rainbow-software.org \
--cc=lv.zheng@intel.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=okaya@codeaurora.org \
--cc=ravikanth.nalla@hpe.com \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=robert.moore@intel.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=timur@codeaurora.org \
--cc=wim@djo.tudelft.nl \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).