From: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>
To: Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@intel.com>,
"Vishal Verma" <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>,
Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>,
Gregory Price <gregory.price@memverge.com>,
"Li, Ming" <ming4.li@intel.com>, <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 1/2] PCI/DOE: Remove the pci_doe_flush_mb() call
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2022 09:39:38 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y35a2nhgOUPhhLeS@iweiny-desk3> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221122195316.GC20515@wunner.de>
On Tue, Nov 22, 2022 at 08:53:16PM +0100, Lukas Wunner wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 22, 2022 at 07:53:23AM -0800, ira.weiny@intel.com wrote:
> > Each struct doe_mb is managed as part of the PCI device. They can't go
> > away as long as the PCI device exists. pci_doe_flush_mb() was set up to
> > flush the workqueue and prevent any further submissions to the mailboxes
> > when the PCI device goes away. Unfortunately, this was fundamentally
> > flawed. There was no guarantee that a struct doe_mb remained after
> > pci_doe_flush_mb() returned. Therefore, the doe_mb state could be
> > invalid when those threads waiting on the workqueue were flushed.
> >
> > Fortunately the current code is safe because all callers make a
> > synchronous call to pci_doe_submit_task() and maintain a reference on the
> > PCI device.
> >
> > For these reasons, pci_doe_flush_mb() will never be called while tasks
> > are being processed and there is no use for it.
>
> Going forward my plan is to allocate all existing DOE mailboxes
> of a device upon enumeration. That will allow concurrent use
> of a mailbox by multiple drivers.
>
> When a pci_dev goes away, say, because it's been hot-removed,
> we need a way to abort all ongoing DOE exchanges.
>
> pci_doe_flush_mb() seems to do just that so I'm not sure why
> it's being removed?
I guess I was not explicit enough in the commit message. 1) it is not used
today. More importantly 2) it does not work.
Because we are not using it currently I thought it best to remove it rather
than try and fix it. Once we have a use then we can figure out how to make
sure the doe_mb[*] is valid until all tasks are flushed.
Ira
[*] Probably with a reference on the struct as was discussed before.
-- https://lore.kernel.org/all/20221122094627.00003f2c@Huawei.com/
>
> Thanks,
>
> Lukas
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-11-23 17:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-11-22 15:53 [PATCH V2 0/2] PCI/DOE: Remove asynchronous task support ira.weiny
2022-11-22 15:53 ` [PATCH V2 1/2] PCI/DOE: Remove the pci_doe_flush_mb() call ira.weiny
2022-11-22 16:34 ` Jonathan Cameron
2022-11-23 17:35 ` Ira Weiny
2022-11-24 11:19 ` Jonathan Cameron
2022-11-22 19:53 ` Lukas Wunner
2022-11-23 17:39 ` Ira Weiny [this message]
2022-11-22 15:53 ` [PATCH V2 2/2] PCI/DOE: Remove asynchronous task support ira.weiny
2022-11-22 16:43 ` Jonathan Cameron
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Y35a2nhgOUPhhLeS@iweiny-desk3 \
--to=ira.weiny@intel.com \
--cc=Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=alison.schofield@intel.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=gregory.price@memverge.com \
--cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lukas@wunner.de \
--cc=ming4.li@intel.com \
--cc=vishal.l.verma@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).