From: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
To: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Cc: "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
"Krzysztof Wilczyński" <kw@linux.com>,
"Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
"Myron Stowe" <myron.stowe@redhat.com>,
"Juha-Pekka Heikkila" <juhapekka.heikkila@gmail.com>,
"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@redhat.com>,
"Borislav Petkov" <bp@alien8.de>,
"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
"Benoit Grégoire" <benoitg@coeus.ca>,
"Hui Wang" <hui.wang@canonical.com>,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] x86/PCI: Disable exclusion of E820 reserved addresses in some cases
Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2022 10:47:46 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Yg4LsrPRkLfRz7eB@lahna> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220216150121.9400-2-hdegoede@redhat.com>
On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 04:01:21PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Some fw has a bug where the PCI bridge window returned by the ACPI
> resources partly overlaps with some other address range, causing issues.
> To workaround this Linux excludes E820 reserved addresses when allocating
> addresses from the PCI bridge window. 2 known examples of such fw bugs are:
>
> 1. The returned window contains addresses which map to system RAM,
> see commit 4dc2287c1805 ("x86: avoid E820 regions when allocating
> address space").
>
> 2. The Lenovo X1 carbon gen 2 BIOS has an overlap between an EFI/E820
> reserved range and the ACPI provided PCI bridge window:
> efi: mem46: [MMIO] range=[0x00000000dfa00000-0x00000000dfa0ffff] (0MB)
> BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000dceff000-0x00000000dfa0ffff] reserved
> pci_bus 0000:00: root bus resource [mem 0xdfa00000-0xfebfffff window]
> If Linux assigns the overlapping 0xdfa00000-0xdfa0ffff range to a PCI BAR
> then the system fails to resume after a suspend.
>
> Recently (2019) some systems have shown-up with EFI memmap MMIO entries
> covering the entire ACPI provided PCI bridge window. These memmap entries
> get converted into e820_table entries, causing all attempts to assign
> memory to PCI BARs which have not been setup by the BIOS to fail.
> For example see these dmesg snippets from a Lenovo IdeaPad 3 15IIL 81WE:
> efi: mem63: [MMIO] range=[0x0000000065400000-0x00000000cfffffff] (1708MB)
> BIOS-e820: [mem 0x000000004bc50000-0x00000000cfffffff] reserved
> pci_bus 0000:00: root bus resource [mem 0x65400000-0xbfffffff window]
> pci 0000:00:15.0: BAR 0: no space for [mem size 0x00001000 64bit]
> pci 0000:00:15.0: BAR 0: failed to assign [mem size 0x00001000 64bit]
>
> To fix this, check if the ACPI provided PCI bridge window is fully
> contained within in EFI memmap MMIO region and in that case disable
> the "exclude E820 reserved addresses" workaround, fixing the problem
> of not being able to find free space for unassigned BARs.
>
> BugLink: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=206459
> BugLink: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1868899
> BugLink: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1871793
> BugLink: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2029207
> BugLink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1878279
> BugLink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1931715
> BugLink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1932069
> BugLink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1921649
> Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-02-17 8:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-02-16 15:01 [PATCH 0/1] x86/PCI: Disable exclusion of E820 reserved addresses in some cases Hans de Goede
2022-02-16 15:01 ` [PATCH 1/1] " Hans de Goede
2022-02-16 15:47 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2022-02-17 8:47 ` Mika Westerberg [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Yg4LsrPRkLfRz7eB@lahna \
--to=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
--cc=benoitg@coeus.ca \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=hdegoede@redhat.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=hui.wang@canonical.com \
--cc=juhapekka.heikkila@gmail.com \
--cc=kw@linux.com \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=myron.stowe@redhat.com \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).