Linux PCI subsystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: dann frazier <dann.frazier@canonical.com>
To: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
	Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
	Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Linux IOMMU <iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	PCI <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iommu/dma: Explicitly sort PCI DMA windows
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2022 21:09:39 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Yjvg846XOpsAbgi6@xps13.dannf> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAL_JsqLFnN46WixKwsuhPswNo8fye4ERhU7_hPdPABi=70p7HA@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Mar 23, 2022 at 07:55:23PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 23, 2022 at 5:15 PM dann frazier <dann.frazier@canonical.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 23, 2022 at 09:49:04AM +0000, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> > > On Tue, 22 Mar 2022 17:27:36 +0000,
> > > Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Originally, creating the dma_ranges resource list in pre-sorted fashion
> > > > was the simplest and most efficient way to enforce the order required by
> > > > iova_reserve_pci_windows(). However since then at least one PCI host
> > > > driver is now re-sorting the list for its own probe-time processing,
> > > > which doesn't seem entirely unreasonable, so that basic assumption no
> > > > longer holds. Make iommu-dma robust and get the sort order it needs by
> > > > explicitly sorting, which means we can also save the effort at creation
> > > > time and just build the list in whatever natural order the DT had.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
> > > > ---
> > > >
> > > > Looking at this area off the back of the XGene thread[1] made me realise
> > > > that we need to do it anyway, regardless of whether it might also happen
> > > > to restore the previous XGene behaviour or not. Presumably nobody's
> > > > tried to use pcie-cadence-host behind an IOMMU yet...
> > >
> > > This definitely restores PCIe functionality on my Mustang (XGene-1).
> > > Hopefully dann can comment on whether this addresses his own issue, as
> > > his firmware is significantly different.
> >
> > Robin, Marc,
> >
> > Adding just this patch on top of v5.17 (w/ vendor dtb) isn't enough to
> > fix m400 networking:
> 
> I wouldn't expect it to given both the IB register selection changed
> and the 2nd dma-ranges entry is ignored.
> 
> Can you (and others) try out this branch:
> 
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/robh/linux.git xgene-pci-fix
> 
> It should maintain the same IB register usage for both cases and
> handle the error in 'dma-ranges'.

Looks good Rob :)

https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/zJF9PKhQpS/


  -dann


  reply	other threads:[~2022-03-24  3:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-03-22 17:27 [PATCH] iommu/dma: Explicitly sort PCI DMA windows Robin Murphy
2022-03-23  9:49 ` Marc Zyngier
2022-03-23 22:15   ` dann frazier
2022-03-24  0:55     ` Rob Herring
2022-03-24  3:09       ` dann frazier [this message]
2022-03-24  0:56 ` Rob Herring
2022-03-24 10:08   ` Robin Murphy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Yjvg846XOpsAbgi6@xps13.dannf \
    --to=dann.frazier@canonical.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox