Linux PCI subsystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>
To: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>,
	Ben Widawsky <bwidawsk@kernel.org>,
	"Alison Schofield" <alison.schofield@intel.com>,
	Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>,
	Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>,
	Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V13 8/9] cxl/port: Retry reading CDAT on failure
Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2022 13:13:41 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YtB49QRceabLTV/7@iweiny-desk3> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YtB3GySfcm5CfG01@iweiny-desk3>

On Thu, Jul 14, 2022 at 01:05:47PM -0700, Ira wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 14, 2022 at 09:27:04AM -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
> > ira.weiny@ wrote:
> > > From: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>
> > > 
> > > The CDAT read may fail for a number of reasons but mainly it is possible
> > > to get different parts of a valid state.  The checksum in the CDAT table
> > > protects against this.
> > 
> > I don't know what "different parts of a valid state" means.
> 
> This text is stale but given what I know about how other entities may be
> issuing queries without the kernel knowledge I'm not 100% sure that the data
> read back will always be valid.
> 
> Regardless, this has already caught a bug in QEMU.
> 
> So I'm inclined to leave this check in because the checksum is there and should
> can be validated if only to detect broken hardware.
> 
> I can update the commit message to clarify this.

Oh wait I thought this was the 'is valid' patch.

I can remove the retries if that was all you were concerned about.

Ira

> 
> Ira
> 
> >
> > The CDAT
> > should not be changing as it is being read unless someone is issuing a
> > set-partition while the DOE operation is happening. Rather than
> > arbitrary retries, block out set-partition while CDAT is being read.
> > 
> > You can use {set,clear}_exclusive_cxl_commands() to temporarily lock out
> > set-partition while the CDAT read is happening.
> > 
> > ...and since this series is only for enabling 

  reply	other threads:[~2022-07-14 20:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-07-05 15:49 [PATCH V13 0/9] CXL: Read CDAT and DSMAS data ira.weiny
2022-07-05 15:49 ` [PATCH V13 1/9] PCI: Add vendor ID for the PCI SIG ira.weiny
2022-07-05 15:49 ` [PATCH V13 2/9] PCI: Replace magic constant for PCI Sig Vendor ID ira.weiny
2022-07-05 15:49 ` [PATCH V13 3/9] PCI: Create PCIe library functions in support of DOE mailboxes ira.weiny
2022-07-07 16:22   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2022-07-11 19:13     ` Ira Weiny
2022-07-11 22:27   ` [PATCH V13.1] PCI/DOE: Add DOE mailbox support functions ira.weiny
2022-07-11 22:47     ` Matthew Wilcox
2022-07-14 14:54       ` Ira Weiny
2022-07-14  3:16   ` [PATCH V13 3/9] PCI: Create PCIe library functions in support of DOE mailboxes Dan Williams
2022-07-14 14:19     ` Ira Weiny
2022-07-05 15:49 ` [PATCH V13 4/9] cxl/pci: Create PCI DOE mailbox's for memory devices ira.weiny
2022-07-14  3:30   ` Dan Williams
2022-07-14 18:50     ` Ira Weiny
2022-07-05 15:49 ` [PATCH V13 5/9] driver-core: Introduce BIN_ATTR_ADMIN_{RO,RW} ira.weiny
2022-07-05 15:49 ` [PATCH V13 6/9] cxl/port: Read CDAT table ira.weiny
2022-07-14 15:38   ` Dan Williams
2022-07-14 19:55     ` Ira Weiny
2022-07-14 20:19       ` Dan Williams
2022-07-15  1:09         ` Ira Weiny
2022-07-05 15:49 ` [PATCH V13 7/9] cxl/port: Introduce cxl_cdat_valid() ira.weiny
2022-07-14 16:05   ` Dan Williams
2022-07-05 15:49 ` [PATCH V13 8/9] cxl/port: Retry reading CDAT on failure ira.weiny
2022-07-14 16:27   ` Dan Williams
2022-07-14 20:05     ` Ira Weiny
2022-07-14 20:13       ` Ira Weiny [this message]
2022-07-14 20:44         ` Dan Williams
2022-07-19 15:07     ` Jonathan Cameron
2022-07-05 15:49 ` [PATCH V13 9/9] cxl/port: Parse out DSMAS data from CDAT table ira.weiny
2022-07-14 16:32   ` Dan Williams
2022-07-14 19:58     ` Ira Weiny

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YtB49QRceabLTV/7@iweiny-desk3 \
    --to=ira.weiny@intel.com \
    --cc=Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \
    --cc=alison.schofield@intel.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=bwidawsk@kernel.org \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lukas@wunner.de \
    --cc=vishal.l.verma@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox