From: Niklas Cassel <cassel@kernel.org>
To: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
Cc: "Jingoo Han" <jingoohan1@gmail.com>,
"Lorenzo Pieralisi" <lpieralisi@kernel.org>,
"Krzysztof Wilczyński" <kw@linux.com>,
"Rob Herring" <robh@kernel.org>,
"Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
"Damien Le Moal" <dlemoal@kernel.org>,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: dwc: Reject a negative nr_irqs value in dw_pcie_edma_irq_verify()
Date: Tue, 31 Dec 2024 19:13:33 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z3Q0TY873woxmsEC@ryzen> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241231155158.5edodo2r5zar3tfe@thinkpad>
On Tue, Dec 31, 2024 at 09:21:58PM +0530, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 20, 2024 at 08:23:29AM +0100, Niklas Cassel wrote:
> > Platforms that do not have (one or more) dedicated IRQs for the eDMA
> > need to set nr_irqs to a non-zero value in their DWC glue driver.
> >
> > Platforms that do have (one or more) dedicated IRQs do not need to
> > initialize nr_irqs. DWC common code will automatically set nr_irqs.
> >
> > Since a glue driver can initialize nr_irqs, dw_pcie_edma_irq_verify()
> > should verify that nr_irqs, if non-zero, is a valid value. Thus, add a
> > check in dw_pcie_edma_irq_verify() to reject a negative nr_irqs value.
> >
>
> Why can't we make dw_edma_chip::nr_irqs unsigned?
dw_edma is defined in drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-core.h
in struct dw_edma.
struct dw_pcie (defined in drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.h)
simply has a struct dw_edma as a struct member.
If you bounce on nr_irqs in:
drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-core.c
and in
drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-pcie.c
you can see that this driver uses signed int for this everywhere.
I didn't feel like refactoring a whole DMA driver.
dw_pcie_edma_irq_verify() is supposed to verify that nr_irqs is either
initialized to a valid value by a DWC PCIe glue driver, or that common
code initializes it.
If nr_irqs is initialized by a glue driver && "pci->edma.nr_irqs != ch_cnt",
dw_pcie_edma_irq_verify() returns error and avoids calling dw_edma_probe(),
thus it made sense for dw_pcie_edma_irq_verify() to also return error on
negative nr_irqs.
Kind regards,
Niklas
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-12-31 18:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-12-20 7:23 [PATCH] PCI: dwc: Reject a negative nr_irqs value in dw_pcie_edma_irq_verify() Niklas Cassel
2024-12-31 15:51 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-12-31 18:13 ` Niklas Cassel [this message]
2024-12-31 18:49 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2025-01-02 10:57 ` Niklas Cassel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z3Q0TY873woxmsEC@ryzen \
--to=cassel@kernel.org \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=dlemoal@kernel.org \
--cc=jingoohan1@gmail.com \
--cc=kw@linux.com \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
--cc=manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox