From: Feng Tang <feng.tang@linux.alibaba.com>
To: Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
Jonathan Cameron <Jonthan.Cameron@huawei.com>,
ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] PCI: Disable PCIE hotplug interrupts early when msi is disabled
Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2025 21:31:22 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z6NoKq6RQWNZC3s2@U-2FWC9VHC-2323.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Z6MF3DuNc4OWHNm-@U-2FWC9VHC-2323.local>
On Wed, Feb 05, 2025 at 02:31:56PM +0800, Feng Tang wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 04, 2025 at 10:14:10AM +0100, Lukas Wunner wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 04, 2025 at 01:37:58PM +0800, Feng Tang wrote:
> > > There was a irq storm bug when testing "pci=nomsi" case, and the root
> > > cause is: 'nomsi' will disable MSI and let devices and root ports use
> > > legacy INTX inerrupt, and likely make several devices/ports share one
> > > interrupt. In the failure case, BIOS doesn't disable the PCIE hotplug
> > > interrupts, and actually asserts the command-complete interrupt.
> > > As MSI is disabled, ACPI initialization code will not enumerate root
> > > port's PCIE hotplug capability, and pciehp service driver wont' be
> > > enabled for the root port to handle that interrupt, later on when it is
> > > shared and enabled by other device driver like NVME or NIC, the "nobody
> > > care irq storm" happens.
> > >
> > > So disable the pcie hotplug CCIE/HPIE interrupt in early boot phase when
> > > MSI is not enbaled.
> >
> > So I think this issue should go away if disabling the interrupt
> > by portdrv is no longer conditional on
> >
> > (pcie_ports_native || host->native_pcie_hotplug)
> >
> > like I've just proposed here:
> >
> > https://lore.kernel.org/r/Z6HYuBDP6uvE1Sf4@wunner.de/
> >
> > ... in which case this patch won't be necessary. Can you confirm that?
>
> Thanks for the suggestion! I will try to get the platform for test,
> and report back.
I haven't got the platform, but I recalled something, that disabling HP
interrupts inside get_port_device_capability()/portdrv_probe() got called
after the nvme_probe(), so it may still cause the irq storm due to:
* pcie root port's hotplug interrupt asserted
* the interrupt is shared with NVME and other device
* those device drivers enable the interrupt line early before portdrv's
probe()
That's why we tried to put the disabling early in PCI initialization code.
Thanks,
Feng
> As for the change,
> + if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HOTPLUG_PCI_PCIE))
> + pcie_capability_clear_word(dev, PCI_EXP_SLTCTL,
> + PCI_EXP_SLTCTL_CCIE | PCI_EXP_SLTCTL_HPIE);
>
> The CONFIG_HOTPLUG_PCI_PCIE is always enabled on our platform and many
> distros, I guess the check needs to be removed, which sees the 1 second
> waiting again, and need the waiting logic in 1/2 patch?
>
> Thanks,
> Feng
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-05 13:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-04 5:37 [PATCH 1/2] PCI/portdrv: Add necessary delay for disabling hotplug events Feng Tang
2025-02-04 5:37 ` [PATCH 2/2] PCI: Disable PCIE hotplug interrupts early when msi is disabled Feng Tang
2025-02-04 9:14 ` Lukas Wunner
2025-02-05 6:31 ` Feng Tang
2025-02-05 13:31 ` Feng Tang [this message]
2025-02-04 9:23 ` Lukas Wunner
2025-02-05 3:58 ` Feng Tang
2025-02-06 6:21 ` Lukas Wunner
2025-02-12 13:04 ` Feng Tang
2025-02-04 9:07 ` [PATCH 1/2] PCI/portdrv: Add necessary delay for disabling hotplug events Lukas Wunner
2025-02-05 2:46 ` Feng Tang
2025-02-05 17:48 ` Markus Elfring
2025-02-06 2:42 ` Feng Tang
2025-02-06 11:40 ` [1/2] " Markus Elfring
2025-02-07 1:40 ` Feng Tang
2025-02-05 18:26 ` [PATCH 1/2] " Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy
2025-02-06 3:18 ` Feng Tang
2025-02-07 4:26 ` Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy
2025-02-07 6:17 ` Feng Tang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z6NoKq6RQWNZC3s2@U-2FWC9VHC-2323.local \
--to=feng.tang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=Jonthan.Cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lukas@wunner.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox