From: Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>
To: Srirangan Madhavan <smadhavan@nvidia.com>
Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>,
Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com>,
Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>,
Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@intel.com>,
Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>,
Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
Zhi Wang <zhiw@nvidia.com>, Vishal Aslot <vaslot@nvidia.com>,
Shanker Donthineni <sdonthineni@nvidia.com>,
linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] cxl: add support for cxl reset
Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2025 11:45:56 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z7hZZNT5NHYncZ3c@wunner.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250221043906.1593189-3-smadhavan@nvidia.com>
On Thu, Feb 20, 2025 at 08:39:06PM -0800, Srirangan Madhavan wrote:
> Type 2 devices are being introduced and will require finer-grained
> reset mechanisms beyond bus-wide reset methods.
>
> Add support for CXL reset per CXL v3.2 Section 9.6/9.7
>
> Signed-off-by: Srirangan Madhavan <smadhavan@nvidia.com>
> ---
> drivers/pci/pci.c | 146 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
drivers/pci/pci.c is basically a catch-all for anything that doesn't fit
in one of the other .c files in drivers/pci. I'm slightly worried that
this (otherwise legitimate) patch increases the clutter in pci.c further,
rendering it unmaintainable in the long term.
At the very least, I'm wondering if this can be #ifdef'ed to
CONFIG_CXL_PCI?
One idea would be to move this newly added reset method, as well as the
existing cxl_reset_bus_function(), to a new drivers/pci/cxl.c file.
I guess moving it to drivers/cxl/ isn't an option because cxl can be
modular.
Another idea would be to move all the reset handling (which makes up
a significant portion of pci.c) to a separate drivers/pci/reset.c.
This might be beyond the scope of your patch, but in the interim,
maybe at least an #ifdef can be added because the PCI core is also
used e.g. on memory-constrained wifi routers which don't care about
CXL at all.
Thanks,
Lukas
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-21 10:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-21 4:39 [PATCH v2 0/2] Add CXL Reset Support for CXL Devices Srirangan Madhavan
2025-02-21 4:39 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] cxl: de-duplicate cxl DVSEC reg defines Srirangan Madhavan
2025-02-21 4:39 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] cxl: add support for cxl reset Srirangan Madhavan
2025-02-21 10:45 ` Lukas Wunner [this message]
2025-02-22 0:13 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-04-07 23:45 ` Srirangan Madhavan
2025-08-22 15:33 ` Alejandro Lucero Palau
2025-02-21 12:43 ` Alejandro Lucero Palau
2025-02-22 5:45 ` kernel test robot
2025-02-22 7:08 ` kernel test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z7hZZNT5NHYncZ3c@wunner.de \
--to=lukas@wunner.de \
--cc=alison.schofield@intel.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
--cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
--cc=ira.weiny@intel.com \
--cc=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sdonthineni@nvidia.com \
--cc=smadhavan@nvidia.com \
--cc=vaslot@nvidia.com \
--cc=vishal.l.verma@intel.com \
--cc=zhiw@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox