linux-pci.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ajay Agarwal <ajayagarwal@google.com>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan 
	<sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>,
	Vidya Sagar <vidyas@nvidia.com>,
	Nikhil Devshatwar <nikhilnd@google.com>,
	Manu Gautam <manugautam@google.com>,
	"David E. Box" <david.e.box@linux.intel.com>,
	Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com>,
	Michael Bottini <michael.a.bottini@linux.intel.com>,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] PCI/ASPM: Remove unnecessary ASPM_STATE_L1SS check
Date: Tue, 2 May 2023 18:37:09 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZFEK/TVIfKDKzpm3@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230501175518.GA594484@bhelgaas>

On Mon, May 01, 2023 at 12:55:18PM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 11, 2023 at 04:40:34PM +0530, Ajay Agarwal wrote:
> > Currently the driver checks if ASPM_STATE_L1SS is supported
> > before calling aspm_calc_l1ss_info(), only for this function to
> > return if ASPM_STATE_L1_2_MASK is not supported. Simplify the
> > logic by directly checking for L1.2 mask.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Ajay Agarwal <ajayagarwal@google.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c | 5 +----
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c b/drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c
> > index 7c9935f331f1..8c45835e8016 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c
> > +++ b/drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c
> > @@ -481,9 +481,6 @@ static void aspm_calc_l1ss_info(struct pcie_link_state *link,
> >  	u32 pctl1, pctl2, cctl1, cctl2;
> >  	u32 pl1_2_enables, cl1_2_enables;
> >  
> > -	if (!(link->aspm_support & ASPM_STATE_L1_2_MASK))
> > -		return;
> > -
> >  	/* Choose the greater of the two Port Common_Mode_Restore_Times */
> >  	val1 = (parent_l1ss_cap & PCI_L1SS_CAP_CM_RESTORE_TIME) >> 8;
> >  	val2 = (child_l1ss_cap & PCI_L1SS_CAP_CM_RESTORE_TIME) >> 8;
> > @@ -616,7 +613,7 @@ static void aspm_l1ss_init(struct pcie_link_state *link)
> >  	if (parent_l1ss_ctl1 & child_l1ss_ctl1 & PCI_L1SS_CTL1_PCIPM_L1_2)
> >  		link->aspm_enabled |= ASPM_STATE_L1_2_PCIPM;
> >  
> > -	if (link->aspm_support & ASPM_STATE_L1SS)
> > +	if (link->aspm_support & ASPM_STATE_L1_2_MASK)
> >  		aspm_calc_l1ss_info(link, parent_l1ss_cap, child_l1ss_cap);
> 
> I think the reason it was this way is because several of the relevant
> names use "l1ss":
> 
>   ASPM_STATE_L1SS
>   aspm_calc_l1ss_info
>   calc_l1ss_pwron
> 
> But everything in aspm_calc_l1ss_info() is L1.2-specific, so I think
> it would make sense to use your patch, and at the same time, rename
> aspm_calc_l1ss_info() and calc_l1ss_pwron() to aspm_calc_l12_info()
> and calc_l12_pwron() to match.
> 
> Bjorn
Sure, will incorporate your suggestions in the next version.

      reply	other threads:[~2023-05-02 13:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-04-11 11:10 [PATCH 0/3] ASPM: aspm_disable/default/support state handling fixes Ajay Agarwal
2023-04-11 11:10 ` [PATCH 1/3] PCI/ASPM: Disable ASPM_STATE_L1 only when class driver disables L1 ASPM Ajay Agarwal
2023-05-01 17:21   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2023-05-02 12:38     ` Ajay Agarwal
2023-05-02 16:07       ` Bjorn Helgaas
2023-05-02 18:32         ` Ajay Agarwal
2023-04-11 11:10 ` [PATCH 2/3] PCI/ASPM: Set ASPM_STATE_L1 when class driver enables L1ss Ajay Agarwal
2023-05-01 17:44   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2023-05-02 13:02     ` Ajay Agarwal
2023-05-02 16:02       ` Bjorn Helgaas
2023-05-02 18:44         ` Ajay Agarwal
2023-04-11 11:10 ` [PATCH 3/3] PCI/ASPM: Remove unnecessary ASPM_STATE_L1SS check Ajay Agarwal
2023-05-01 17:55   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2023-05-02 13:07     ` Ajay Agarwal [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZFEK/TVIfKDKzpm3@google.com \
    --to=ajayagarwal@google.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=david.e.box@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
    --cc=kai.heng.feng@canonical.com \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=manugautam@google.com \
    --cc=michael.a.bottini@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=nikhilnd@google.com \
    --cc=sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=vidyas@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).