From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
To: Linux regressions mailing list <regressions@lists.linux.dev>
Cc: Koba Ko <koba.ko@canonical.com>,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, Vidya Sagar <vidyas@nvidia.com>,
Ajay Agarwal <ajayagarwal@google.com>,
Tasev Nikola <tasev.stefanoska@skynet.be>,
Mark Enriquez <enriquezmark36@gmail.com>,
Thomas Witt <kernel@witt.link>
Subject: Re: [Bug 217321] New: Intel platforms can't sleep deeper than PC3 during long idle
Date: Tue, 23 May 2023 16:49:02 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZG00zhXPMigJIISI@bhelgaas> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <844f3819-c819-bc55-0518-0b1b9651825f@leemhuis.info>
On Mon, May 22, 2023 at 01:45:55PM +0200, Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis) wrote:
> On 05.05.23 08:56, Koba Ko wrote:
> > On Thu, May 4, 2023 at 5:23 PM Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org> wrote:
> >> [+cc Koba, Ajay, Tasev, Mark, Thomas, regressions list]
> >> On Tue, Apr 11, 2023 at 03:42:29PM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> >>> On Tue, Apr 11, 2023 at 08:32:04AM +0000, bugzilla-daemon@kernel.org wrote:
> >>>> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217321
> >>>> ...
> >>>> Regression: No
> >>>>
> >>>> [Symptom]
> >>>> Intel cpu can't sleep deeper than pcˇ during long idle
> >>>> ~~~
> >>>> Pkg%pc2 Pkg%pc3 Pkg%pc6 Pkg%pc7 Pkg%pc8 Pkg%pc9 Pk%pc10
> >>>> 15.08 75.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
> >>>> 15.09 75.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
> >>>> ^CPkg%pc2 Pkg%pc3 Pkg%pc6 Pkg%pc7 Pkg%pc8 Pkg%pc9 Pk%pc10
> >>>> 15.38 68.97 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
> >>>> 15.38 68.96 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
> >>>> ~~~
> >>>> [How to Reproduce]
> >>>> 1. run turbostat to monitor
> >>>> 2. leave machine idle
> >>>> 3. turbostat show cpu only go into pc2~pc3.
> >>>>
> >>>> [Misc]
> >>>> The culprit are this
> >>>> a7152be79b62) Revert "PCI/ASPM: Save L1 PM Substates Capability for
> >>>> suspend/resume”
> >>>>
> >>>> if revert a7152be79b62, the issue is gone
> >>>
> >>> Relevant commits:
> >>>
> >>> 4ff116d0d5fd ("PCI/ASPM: Save L1 PM Substates Capability for suspend/resume")
> >>> a7152be79b62 ("Revert "PCI/ASPM: Save L1 PM Substates Capability for suspend/resume"")
> >>>
> >>> 4ff116d0d5fd appeared in v6.1-rc1. Prior to 4ff116d0d5fd, ASPM L1 PM
> >>> Substates configuration was not preserved across suspend/resume, so
> >>> the system *worked* after resume, but used more power than expected.
> >>>
> >>> But 4ff116d0d5fd caused resume to fail completely on some systems, so
> >>> a7152be79b62 reverted it. With a7152be79b62 reverted, ASPM L1 PM
> >>> Substates configuration is likely not preserved across suspend/resume.
> >>> a7152be79b62 appeared in v6.2-rc8 and was backported to the v6.1
> >>> stable series starting with v6.1.12.
> >>>
> >>> KobaKo, you don't mention any suspend/resume in this bug report, but
> >>> neither patch should make any difference unless suspend/resume is
> >>> involved. Does the platform sleep as expected *before* suspend, but
> >>> fail to sleep after resume?
> >>>
> >>> Or maybe some individual device was suspended via runtime power
> >>> management, and that device lost its L1 PM Substates config? I don't
> >>> know if there's a way to disable runtime PM easily.
> >>
> >> Koba, per your bugzilla update, the issue happens even without
> >> suspend/resume. And we don't know whether some particular device is
> >> responsible.
> >>
> >> But if we save/restore L1SS state, we can sleep deeper than PC3. If
> >> we don't preserve L1SS state, we can't.
> >>
> >> We definitely want to preserve the L1SS state, but we can't simply
> >> apply 4ff116d0d5fd ("PCI/ASPM: Save L1 PM Substates Capability for
> >> suspend/resume") again because it caused its own regressions [1,2,3]
> >>
> >> So somebody needs to figure out what was wrong with 4ff116d0d5fd, fix
> >> it, verify that it doesn't cause the issues reported by Tasev, Thomas,
> >> and Mark, and then we can apply it.
> >
> > Good days, discussed with Kai-Heng and he mentioned the GPU may not
> > be pulled off the power.
> > then the GPU needs L1ss to get into power saving.
> >
> > I will investigate further on this way.
>
> Did anything come our of this?
>
> FWIW, I'm considering to drop this from the list of tracked regressions.
> Yes, this is a regression, but it's caused by fix for another (worse)
> regression -- so there is nothing we can do for now anyway (and Koba
> seems motivated already to look properly into all of this). Or does
> anyone consider this to be a problem?
I would drop this from the regression list.
Yes, bz 217321 is a bug, and yes, 4ff116d0d5fd is a partial fix for
it, but 4ff116d0d5fd causes worse problems (it breaks resume from
suspend) than just living with bz 217321, which is a "mere" power
consumption issue.
I updated bz 217321 to drop the "regression" label there.
Bjorn
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-05-23 21:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <bug-217321-41252@https.bugzilla.kernel.org/>
2023-04-11 20:42 ` [Bug 217321] New: Intel platforms can't sleep deeper than PC3 during long idle Bjorn Helgaas
2023-04-12 12:24 ` Linux regression tracking #adding (Thorsten Leemhuis)
2023-04-12 12:30 ` Thorsten Leemhuis
2023-05-04 15:23 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2023-05-05 6:56 ` Koba Ko
2023-05-22 11:45 ` Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis)
2023-05-23 21:49 ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]
2023-05-24 4:15 ` Linux regression tracking #update (Thorsten Leemhuis)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZG00zhXPMigJIISI@bhelgaas \
--to=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=ajayagarwal@google.com \
--cc=enriquezmark36@gmail.com \
--cc=kernel@witt.link \
--cc=koba.ko@canonical.com \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=regressions@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=tasev.stefanoska@skynet.be \
--cc=vidyas@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox