From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
To: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
Cc: "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
<sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>,
Iain Lane <iain@orangesquash.org.uk>,
Shyam-sundar S-k <Shyam-sundar.S-k@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 6/9] ACPI: x86: s2idle: Add a function to get constraints for a device
Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2023 18:47:44 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZNUGoONuUZAp0TM9@smile.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230809185453.40916-7-mario.limonciello@amd.com>
On Wed, Aug 09, 2023 at 01:54:50PM -0500, Mario Limonciello wrote:
> Other parts of the kernel may use constraints information to make
> decisions on what power state to put a device into.
...
> +int acpi_get_lps0_constraint(struct device *dev)
> +{
> + int i;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < lpi_constraints_table_size; ++i) {
> + static struct lpi_constraints *entry;
static?!
Seems to me with the code in lpi_check_constraints() this actually can be first
(separate patch maybe with conversion of the mentioned user) transformed to
#define for_each_lpi_constraint(entry)
for (int i = 0;
entry = &lpi_constraints_table[i], i < lpi_constraints_table_size;
i++)
> + int val;
> +
> + entry = &lpi_constraints_table[i];
> + if (!device_match_acpi_handle(dev, entry->handle))
> + continue;
> + val = entry->enabled ? entry->min_dstate : 0;
> + acpi_handle_debug(entry->handle,
> + "ACPI device constraint: %d\n", val);
> + return val;
> + }
So will become
struct lpi_constraints *entry;
int val;
for_each_lpi_constraint(entry) {
if (!device_match_acpi_handle(dev, entry->handle))
continue;
val = entry->enabled ? entry->min_dstate : 0;
acpi_handle_debug(entry->handle,
"ACPI device constraint: %d\n", val);
return val;
}
> + return -ENODEV;
> +}
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-08-10 15:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-08-09 18:54 [PATCH v11 0/9] Fix wakeup problems on some AMD platforms Mario Limonciello
2023-08-09 18:54 ` [PATCH v11 1/9] ACPI: Add comments to clarify some #ifdef statements Mario Limonciello
2023-08-09 18:54 ` [PATCH v11 2/9] ACPI: Adjust #ifdef for *_lps0_dev use Mario Limonciello
2023-08-15 18:28 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2023-08-15 18:32 ` Mario Limonciello
2023-08-16 16:57 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2023-08-09 18:54 ` [PATCH v11 3/9] ACPI: x86: s2idle: Fix a logic error parsing AMD constraints table Mario Limonciello
2023-08-15 19:20 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2023-08-09 18:54 ` [PATCH v11 4/9] ACPI: x86: s2idle: Add more debugging for AMD constraints parsing Mario Limonciello
2023-08-09 18:54 ` [PATCH v11 5/9] ACPI: x86: s2idle: Store if constraint is enabled Mario Limonciello
2023-08-09 18:54 ` [PATCH v11 6/9] ACPI: x86: s2idle: Add a function to get constraints for a device Mario Limonciello
2023-08-10 15:47 ` Andy Shevchenko [this message]
2023-08-10 15:54 ` Limonciello, Mario
2023-08-10 15:58 ` Andy Shevchenko
2023-08-09 18:54 ` [PATCH v11 7/9] PCI: ACPI: Add helper functions for converting ACPI <->PCI states Mario Limonciello
2023-08-09 18:54 ` [PATCH v11 8/9] PCI: Split PME state selection into a local static function Mario Limonciello
2023-08-10 16:21 ` Andy Shevchenko
2023-08-10 16:29 ` Limonciello, Mario
2023-08-11 8:55 ` Andy Shevchenko
2023-08-11 12:40 ` Limonciello, Mario
2023-08-09 18:54 ` [PATCH v11 9/9] PCI: ACPI: Use device constraints to decide PCI target state fallback policy Mario Limonciello
2023-08-15 23:48 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2023-08-16 12:57 ` Limonciello, Mario
2023-08-16 22:38 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2023-08-17 1:26 ` Limonciello, Mario
2023-08-17 12:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2023-08-17 18:31 ` Limonciello, Mario
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZNUGoONuUZAp0TM9@smile.fi.intel.com \
--to=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=Shyam-sundar.S-k@amd.com \
--cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=iain@orangesquash.org.uk \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mario.limonciello@amd.com \
--cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).