Linux PCI subsystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Niklas Cassel <Niklas.Cassel@wdc.com>
To: Frank Li <Frank.li@nxp.com>
Cc: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>,
	Vidya Sagar <vidyas@nvidia.com>,
	"helgaas@kernel.org" <helgaas@kernel.org>,
	"kishon@ti.com" <kishon@ti.com>,
	"lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com" <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
	"kw@linux.com" <kw@linux.com>,
	"jingoohan1@gmail.com" <jingoohan1@gmail.com>,
	"gustavo.pimentel@synopsys.com" <gustavo.pimentel@synopsys.com>,
	"lznuaa@gmail.com" <lznuaa@gmail.com>,
	"hongxing.zhu@nxp.com" <hongxing.zhu@nxp.com>,
	"jdmason@kudzu.us" <jdmason@kudzu.us>,
	"dave.jiang@intel.com" <dave.jiang@intel.com>,
	"allenbh@gmail.com" <allenbh@gmail.com>,
	"linux-ntb@googlegroups.com" <linux-ntb@googlegroups.com>,
	"linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] PCI: designware-ep: Allow pci_epc_set_bar() update inbound map address
Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2023 10:11:19 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZX13xhBm3RmshqgD@x1-carbon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZXtzjIIl5oabviZI@lizhi-Precision-Tower-5810>

On Thu, Dec 14, 2023 at 04:28:44PM -0500, Frank Li wrote:
> 

(snip)

> Does below change fix your problem?

It is basically the same fix as I sent out earlier in this thread,
but yes, it does solve 1 out of 2 problems introduced by the patch
in $subject, so:

Tested-by: Niklas Cassel <niklas.cassel@wdc.com>

> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-ep.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-ep.c
> index f6207989fc6ad..2868d44649ef7 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-ep.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-ep.c
> @@ -177,7 +177,7 @@ static int dw_pcie_ep_inbound_atu(struct dw_pcie_ep *ep, u8 func_no, int type,
>         if (!ep->bar_to_atu[bar])
>                 free_win = find_first_zero_bit(ep->ib_window_map, pci->num_ib_windows);
>         else
> -               free_win = ep->bar_to_atu[bar];
> +               free_win = ep->bar_to_atu[bar] - 1;
>  
>         if (free_win >= pci->num_ib_windows) {
>                 dev_err(pci->dev, "No free inbound window\n");
> @@ -191,7 +191,7 @@ static int dw_pcie_ep_inbound_atu(struct dw_pcie_ep *ep, u8 func_no, int type,
>                 return ret;
>         }
>  
> -       ep->bar_to_atu[bar] = free_win;
> +       ep->bar_to_atu[bar] = free_win + 1;
>         set_bit(free_win, ep->ib_window_map);
>  
>         return 0;
> @@ -228,7 +228,7 @@ static void dw_pcie_ep_clear_bar(struct pci_epc *epc, u8 func_no, u8 vfunc_no,
>         struct dw_pcie_ep *ep = epc_get_drvdata(epc);
>         struct dw_pcie *pci = to_dw_pcie_from_ep(ep);
>         enum pci_barno bar = epf_bar->barno;
> -       u32 atu_index = ep->bar_to_atu[bar];
> +       u32 atu_index = ep->bar_to_atu[bar] - 1;

You probably want to add a:

if (!ep->bar_to_atu[bar])
	return;

here, so that dw_pcie_ep_clear_bar() will never try to use -1 as index.
(E.g. if clear_bar() is called twice on the same BAR.)

>  
>         __dw_pcie_ep_reset_bar(pci, func_no, bar, epf_bar->flags);
> 

(snip)

> > > from dw_pcie_ep_set_bar(), also needs to be dropped, so that the iATU
> > > settings will be re-written for platforms with core_init_notifiers.
> > > 
> > > Right now, for a platform with a core_init_notifier, if you run
> > > pci_endpoint_test + reboot the RC (so that PERST is asserted + deasserted),
> > > and then run pci_endpoint_test again, then I'm quite sure that
> > > pci_endpoint_test will not pass the second time (because iATU settings
> > > were not rewritten after reset).
> > > 
> > > It would be nice if Mani or Vidya could confirm this.

So problem 2 out of 2 introduced by the patch in $subject is that
DWC drivers with a .core_init_notifier, will perform a reset_control_assert()
to reset the core (which will reset both sticky and non-sticky registers),
which means that the early return in dw_pcie_ep_set_bar():
https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/v6.7-rc5/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-ep.c#L268-L269

while returning after the iATU settings have been written,
it will return before:

	dw_pcie_writel_dbi2(pci, reg_dbi2, lower_32_bits(size - 1));
	dw_pcie_writel_dbi(pci, reg, flags);

Which means that, for drivers with a .core_init_notifier, BARx_REG and
BARx_MASK registers will not be written. This means that they will have
reset values for these registers, which means that e.g. the BAR_SIZE
(which is defined by BARx_MASK) might be incorrect for these platforms
because this function returns early.

I will not send a fix for this problem, I will leave that to you, or Mani,
or Vidya, and hope that people are happy that I simply reported this issue.


Here is my suggested solution in case anyone wants to take a stab at it:

> > > I guess one option would be modify dw_pcie_ep_init_notify() to call
> > > dw_pcie_ep_clear_bar() on all non-NULL BARs stored in ep->epf_bar[],
> > > before calling pci_epc_init_notify(). That way the second .core_init
> > > (pci_epf_test_core_init()) call will use write the settings, because
> > > ep->epf_bar[] will be empty, so the "write the settings only the first
> > > time" approach will then also work for core_init_notifier platforms.


Kind regards,
Niklas

  reply	other threads:[~2023-12-16 10:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-02-22 16:23 [PATCH V2 0/4] NTB function for PCIe RC to EP connection Frank Li
2022-02-22 16:23 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] PCI: designware-ep: Allow pci_epc_set_bar() update inbound map address Frank Li
2023-12-14 14:31   ` Niklas Cassel
2023-12-14 15:19     ` Frank Li
2023-12-14 20:23       ` Niklas Cassel
2023-12-14 20:52         ` Frank Li
2023-12-14 21:28           ` Frank Li
2023-12-16 10:11             ` Niklas Cassel [this message]
2023-12-19 17:59               ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2023-12-20  5:14                 ` Damien Le Moal
2023-12-20  6:03                   ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2023-12-20  7:06                     ` Damien Le Moal
2023-12-14 21:39           ` Niklas Cassel
2022-02-22 16:23 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] NTB: epf: Allow more flexibility in the memory BAR map method Frank Li
2022-03-10 22:08   ` Zhi Li
2022-02-22 16:23 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] PCI: endpoint: Support NTB transfer between RC and EP Frank Li
2022-03-10 22:09   ` Zhi Li
2022-12-14  0:08   ` Bjorn Helgaas
     [not found]     ` <CAHrpEqSGySHDET3YPu3czzoMBmCRJsgGgU4s3GWWbtruFLVHaA@mail.gmail.com>
2022-12-14  0:28       ` Bjorn Helgaas
2022-12-14  0:47         ` [EXT] " Frank Li
2022-02-22 16:23 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] Documentation: PCI: Add specification for the PCI vNTB function device Frank Li
2022-03-10 22:01 ` [PATCH V2 0/4] NTB function for PCIe RC to EP connection Zhi Li
2022-03-10 22:07   ` Zhi Li
2022-04-04 20:12     ` Zhi Li
2022-04-05 10:34 ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2022-04-05 15:35   ` Zhi Li
2022-04-20 20:22     ` Zhi Li
2022-04-22 15:15       ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2022-04-22 15:36         ` Zhi Li
2022-08-12 14:02 ` Jon Mason

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZX13xhBm3RmshqgD@x1-carbon \
    --to=niklas.cassel@wdc.com \
    --cc=Frank.li@nxp.com \
    --cc=allenbh@gmail.com \
    --cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
    --cc=gustavo.pimentel@synopsys.com \
    --cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
    --cc=hongxing.zhu@nxp.com \
    --cc=jdmason@kudzu.us \
    --cc=jingoohan1@gmail.com \
    --cc=kishon@ti.com \
    --cc=kw@linux.com \
    --cc=linux-ntb@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
    --cc=lznuaa@gmail.com \
    --cc=manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org \
    --cc=vidyas@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox