From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 077AD26A0C1; Thu, 10 Apr 2025 09:59:37 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1744279178; cv=none; b=J/Ecou+C4S3vXIG9IwGEsery1x06yNPRuW0ZGrfNITRTcLY6jbyH+Lv7GZ9qtutNoo1nInXHeSOZbz4AIf6UJf+BJjJmOeKqzPBWyNHhpa149tFw1p5CtHgvPvpieyjVnv36xSmboKwhl3SegeSwKOz0/j6EJyuCkurbDjXkiS0= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1744279178; c=relaxed/simple; bh=OLoyISjxtlYxrHqthuPpR+LH054SYc7FyhmF4e900cQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=YPc9jUaEMIZwioBew0zr+1M3amUqvOjdMmJcQC0SH3wMeZ8ydlKb+oUxwyZZ/VIPckMpXNQttptWbuQ4UvQwQVRW4gzm1bPF4VQPpbuAslhyg4zsuJ6lQzU2qh4WDsESWBfupMCI6lSG3rh1zofxrJY0Da2YF4ryaBeKFxUiE98= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=WOfvEmJa; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="WOfvEmJa" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 84C7CC4CEDD; Thu, 10 Apr 2025 09:59:34 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1744279177; bh=OLoyISjxtlYxrHqthuPpR+LH054SYc7FyhmF4e900cQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=WOfvEmJag8Vqyu1E9yS32WtIWyEe3n9B8jzdmtGpzArg0CajdiER8vtqFZ8yQpe5/ mG2CCmwGGaT8IcnyBoYyTg2nyltCOIXy86eVtlDOatwsaeZ72FzYuDxdzgitpqslaC eO53wDmLfdSopU/m6K51IySHfavbwx1r+Hgw6Fbd8sub14si//0GjMOl5KlEG1pzxY +o11R7EwY5v4sNUL7uDiiZ/cJMW7y6l40B/DgGyvalKtsa4IYsheuShaIBfLA3MXVG OfIbQfTcCj2LSLf7ZyvdEhPpFM64dgoaKmA/b+vaUuX2u31Md3R8K8zp2298+Phe8Z lHtEbvJBa+0uQ== Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2025 11:59:31 +0200 From: Niklas Cassel To: Brian Norris Cc: Bartosz Golaszewski , Bjorn Helgaas , Jingoo Han , Manivannan Sadhasivam , Lorenzo Pieralisi , Krzysztof =?utf-8?Q?Wilczy=C5=84ski?= , Krishna Chaitanya Chundru , Rob Herring , linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org, Tsai Sung-Fu Subject: Re: [RFC] PCI: pwrctrl and link-up dependencies Message-ID: References: Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Tue, Apr 08, 2025 at 12:59:36PM -0700, Brian Norris wrote: > I also see that Manivannan has a proposal out [2] to add semi-generic > link-down + retraining support to core code. It treads somewhat similar > ground, and I could even imagine that its pci_ops::retrain_link() > callback could even be reimplemented in terms of the aforementioned > pci_ops::{start,stop}_link(), or possibly vice versa. Just want to point out that there is a newer version of this series here: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/20250404-pcie-reset-slot-v1-0-98952918bf90@linaro.org/T/#t Kind regards, Niklas