public inbox for linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Niklas Cassel <cassel@kernel.org>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: "Manivannan Sadhasivam" <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>,
	"Krzysztof Wilczyński" <kw@linux.com>,
	"Kishon Vijay Abraham I" <kishon@kernel.org>,
	"Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	"Damien Le Moal" <dlemoal@kernel.org>,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] misc: pci_endpoint_test: Use memcpy_toio()/memcpy_fromio() for BAR tests
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2024 22:36:05 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZfoFRTAh9O88o8ZD@ryzen> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e284c1cc-0258-4363-930f-5b508855c094@app.fastmail.com>

Hello Arnd,

On Tue, Mar 19, 2024 at 08:55:19PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 19, 2024, at 17:53, Niklas Cassel wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 19, 2024 at 10:18:26PM +0530, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> >> > 
> >> > I did also see this comment:
> >> > https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/master/Documentation/memory-barriers.txt#L2785-L2790
> >> > 
> >> > Do you think that we need to perform any flushing after the memset(),
> >> > to ensure that the data written using memcpy_toio() is actually what
> >> > we expect it to me?
> >> > 
> >> 
> >> The documentation recommends cache flushing only if the normal memory write and
> >> MMIO access are dependent. But here you are just accessing the MMIO. So no
> >> explicit ordering or cache flushing is required.
> >
> > What does dependent mean in this case then?
> >
> > Since the data that we are writing to the device is the data that was
> > just written to memory using memset().
> 
> You need a barrier for the case where the memset() writes to
> a buffer in RAM and then you write the address of that buffer
> into a device register, which triggers a DMA read from the
> buffer. Without a barrier, the side effect of the MMIO write
> may come before the data in the RAM buffer is visible.
> 
> A memcpy_fromio() only involves a single master accessing
> the memory (i.e. the CPU executing both the memset() and the
> memcpy()), so there is no way this can go wrong.

Thank you for the clarification.


Kind regards,
Niklas

      reply	other threads:[~2024-03-19 21:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-03-18 19:30 [PATCH] misc: pci_endpoint_test: Use memcpy_toio()/memcpy_fromio() for BAR tests Niklas Cassel
2024-03-18 20:02 ` Arnd Bergmann
2024-03-19  4:31   ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-03-19  6:41     ` Arnd Bergmann
2024-03-19 16:40   ` Niklas Cassel
2024-03-19 16:48     ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-03-19 16:53       ` Niklas Cassel
2024-03-19 19:55         ` Arnd Bergmann
2024-03-19 21:36           ` Niklas Cassel [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZfoFRTAh9O88o8ZD@ryzen \
    --to=cassel@kernel.org \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=dlemoal@kernel.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=kishon@kernel.org \
    --cc=kw@linux.com \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox