From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 08C0B12FB00; Thu, 18 Apr 2024 08:29:42 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1713428983; cv=none; b=ozzeS2VEXknQJ+MDB2XHjuGdHfl+JAyc4LRPo59VSoidrstAFo3AsIkcl57uMUm6YBoCMOQbq1PCNAcQ+A885alcrEKyPgXdiP7K4qzpQmQ3cKJvzbF2hlXR9vMO1hX+vSyyf5VV+J1ImyM8JQHnsTwWs7nnZcANkvbLLzmvXuc= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1713428983; c=relaxed/simple; bh=epqtCU7cHFg6qcrksoflXTGplFleqVGd4CaEPMYW1d8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=hQhfNovP+f2gfn5p8G4qlDL6ML8gQgffOGDD0nGdMhm15lzDBxZq+AcBprDac/xzRDq1Dh7g6Lrn5wiMVYIpUXksEY/CWsbNK8ONLNVVq07t54Nfz0nPZJ93ZjpLx76j2pnPJKsEgsP89qPSl0Xkb5xT55SFAzyRuVJAxTjjKS0= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=tjD/4+e4; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="tjD/4+e4" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E5AF8C32781; Thu, 18 Apr 2024 08:29:40 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1713428982; bh=epqtCU7cHFg6qcrksoflXTGplFleqVGd4CaEPMYW1d8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=tjD/4+e4vSScmvSoEvYQoRNeiQAYlbYXzasd0/Rl0orlzzFKkOvIvRkR8cKoA1I6Q dposssKjjyWT4Y52T/bz7YfGNkxruHcxz33+n9Y5snKbqpZSQRVtQYJuPZuZs/Sg1R k3Q1Q8Cfm38H26kT6/1vhLW7dXnRqNGxRM0FYxj4PAMYa6gVM5YzFxdCc5LtBPHJAq lLX/ybDMiolc5dRUDXD4x5k7nGsRUGoh7yYT+wUwLOcGRYQr1vyKeUAtwk/cEQkanK SqwWXSqmEU8tVYaicFqMnxbDR/TyD5fnpaFWwCWkX4rbRrIchayKcN3MKMr0wCwVpM AbvDMyzTJWhfw== Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2024 10:29:37 +0200 From: Niklas Cassel To: Manivannan Sadhasivam Cc: Krzysztof =?utf-8?Q?Wilczy=C5=84ski?= , Kishon Vijay Abraham I , Bjorn Helgaas , Lorenzo Pieralisi , linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] PCI: endpoint: pci-epf-test: Use 'msix_capable' flag directly in pci_epf_test_alloc_space() Message-ID: References: <20240418-pci-epf-test-fix-v2-0-eacd54831444@linaro.org> <20240418-pci-epf-test-fix-v2-2-eacd54831444@linaro.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240418-pci-epf-test-fix-v2-2-eacd54831444@linaro.org> On Thu, Apr 18, 2024 at 01:29:59PM +0530, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote: > Instead of using a local variable to cache the 'msix_capable' flag, use it > directly to simplify the code. > > Suggested-by: Niklas Cassel > Signed-off-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam > --- Reviewed-by: Niklas Cassel