linux-pci.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ajay Agarwal <ajayagarwal@google.com>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
Cc: "Ilpo Järvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>,
	"David E. Box" <david.e.box@linux.intel.com>,
	"Johan Hovold" <johan+linaro@kernel.org>,
	"Manivannan Sadhasivam" <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>,
	"Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	"Manu Gautam" <manugautam@google.com>,
	"Sajid Dalvi" <sdalvi@google.com>,
	"Heiner Kallweit" <hkallweit1@gmail.com>,
	"Vidya Sagar" <vidyas@nvidia.com>,
	"Shuai Xue" <xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com>,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI/ASPM: Disable L1 before disabling L1ss
Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2024 18:35:24 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Zv6WlCuPNWRZ1Rpg@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241002200926.GA268053@bhelgaas>

On Wed, Oct 02, 2024 at 03:09:26PM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 02, 2024 at 01:12:23PM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 01, 2024 at 07:05:18PM +0530, Ajay Agarwal wrote:
> > > The current sequence in the driver for L1ss update is as follows.
> > > 
> > > Disable L1ss
> > > Disable L1
> > > Enable L1ss as required
> > > Enable L1 if required
> > > 
> > > PCIe spec r6.2, section 5.5.4, recommends that setting either
> > > or both of the enable bits for ASPM L1 PM Substates must be done
> > > while ASPM L1 is disabled. My interpretation here is that
> > > clearing L1ss should also be done when L1 is disabled. Thereby,
> > > change the sequence as follows.
> > > 
> > > Disable L1
> > > Disable L1ss
> > > Enable L1ss as required
> > > Enable L1 if required
> > ...
> 
> > pcie_config_aspm_link() has a comment ("Spec 2.0 ...") about the
> > configuration order, but I'd like to update that, add a section
> > reference, and make sure we do the disable in the right order.
> 
> Found some language about this in the ASPM Control description in PCIe
> r6.2, sec 7.5.3.7, Link Control.
> 
Right. Added in the next version.

> Also in sec 7.9.9.3, Root Complex Link Control, although I don't think
> Linux has any support for this register.
Right. There is no support for this reg.

  reply	other threads:[~2024-10-03 13:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-10-01 13:35 [PATCH] PCI/ASPM: Disable L1 before disabling L1ss Ajay Agarwal
2024-10-02 18:12 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2024-10-02 20:09   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2024-10-03 13:05     ` Ajay Agarwal [this message]
2024-10-03 13:04   ` Ajay Agarwal

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Zv6WlCuPNWRZ1Rpg@google.com \
    --to=ajayagarwal@google.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=david.e.box@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
    --cc=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
    --cc=ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=johan+linaro@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org \
    --cc=manugautam@google.com \
    --cc=sdalvi@google.com \
    --cc=vidyas@nvidia.com \
    --cc=xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).