linux-pci.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
To: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	<linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] drm/i915/pm: Hoist pci_save_state()+pci_set_power_state() to the end of pm _late() hook
Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2024 12:40:34 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZvWOgs0Y9CN3aNac@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZvWAndAvgfM6_eG1@intel.com>

On Thu, Sep 26, 2024 at 06:41:17PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 26, 2024 at 10:43:21AM -0400, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 25, 2024 at 05:45:22PM +0300, Ville Syrjala wrote:
> > > From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> > > 
> > > driver/pci does the pci_save_state()+pci_set_power_state() from the
> > > _noirq() pm hooks. Move our manual calls (needed for the hibernate+D3
> > > workaround with buggy BIOSes) towards that same point. We currently
> > > have no _noirq() hooks, so end of _late() hooks is the best we can
> > > do right now.
> > > 
> > > Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
> > > Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
> > > Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
> > > Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
> > > Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> > > Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_driver.c | 19 ++++++++++++++-----
> > >  1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_driver.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_driver.c
> > > index 6dc0104a3e36..9d557ff8adf5 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_driver.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_driver.c
> > > @@ -1015,7 +1015,6 @@ static int i915_drm_suspend(struct drm_device *dev)
> > >  {
> > >  	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(dev);
> > >  	struct intel_display *display = &dev_priv->display;
> > > -	struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(dev_priv->drm.dev);
> > >  	pci_power_t opregion_target_state;
> > >  
> > >  	disable_rpm_wakeref_asserts(&dev_priv->runtime_pm);
> > > @@ -1029,8 +1028,6 @@ static int i915_drm_suspend(struct drm_device *dev)
> > >  		intel_display_driver_disable_user_access(dev_priv);
> > >  	}
> > >  
> > > -	pci_save_state(pdev);
> > > -
> > >  	intel_display_driver_suspend(dev_priv);
> > >  
> > >  	intel_dp_mst_suspend(dev_priv);
> > > @@ -1090,10 +1087,16 @@ static int i915_drm_suspend_late(struct drm_device *dev, bool hibernation)
> > >  		drm_err(&dev_priv->drm, "Suspend complete failed: %d\n", ret);
> > >  		intel_power_domains_resume(dev_priv);
> > >  
> > > -		goto out;
> > > +		goto fail;
> > >  	}
> > >  
> > > +	enable_rpm_wakeref_asserts(rpm);
> > > +
> > > +	if (!dev_priv->uncore.user_forcewake_count)
> > > +		intel_runtime_pm_driver_release(rpm);
> > > +
> > 
> > why do we need this?
> > probably deserves a separate patch?
> 
> It was there already.

yes, but it was done in a later stage and now it is called earlier
in the regular path. I believe it deserves a 'why' that is not clear
in this commit message.

> 
> > 
> > >  	pci_disable_device(pdev);
> > > +
> > >  	/*
> > >  	 * During hibernation on some platforms the BIOS may try to access
> > >  	 * the device even though it's already in D3 and hang the machine. So
> > > @@ -1105,11 +1108,17 @@ static int i915_drm_suspend_late(struct drm_device *dev, bool hibernation)
> > >  	 * Lenovo Thinkpad X301, X61s, X60, T60, X41
> > >  	 * Fujitsu FSC S7110
> > >  	 * Acer Aspire 1830T
> > > +	 *
> > > +	 * pci_save_state() is needed to prevent driver/pci from
> > > +	 * automagically putting the device into D3.
> > >  	 */
> > 
> > I'm still not convinced that this would automagically prevent the D3,
> > specially in this part of the code.
> 
> You need to read pci_pm_poweroff_noirq()
> 
> > 
> > I would prefer to simply remove this call, or keep it and move it
> > here to be consistent with other drivers, but also add the restore
> > portion of it for consistency and alignment...
> > 
> > > +	pci_save_state(pdev);
> > >  	if (!(hibernation && GRAPHICS_VER(dev_priv) < 6))
> > >  		pci_set_power_state(pdev, PCI_D3hot);
> > >  
> > > -out:
> > > +	return 0;
> > > +
> > > +fail:
> > >  	enable_rpm_wakeref_asserts(rpm);
> > >  	if (!dev_priv->uncore.user_forcewake_count)
> > >  		intel_runtime_pm_driver_release(rpm);
> > > -- 
> > > 2.44.2
> > > 
> 
> -- 
> Ville Syrjälä
> Intel

  reply	other threads:[~2024-09-26 16:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-09-25 14:45 [PATCH 0/6] drm/i915/pm: Clean up the hibernate vs. PCI D3 quirk Ville Syrjala
2024-09-25 14:45 ` [PATCH 1/6] PCI/PM: Respect pci_dev->skip_bus_pm in the .poweroff() path Ville Syrjala
2024-09-25 19:28   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2024-09-26 16:03     ` Ville Syrjälä
2024-09-30 19:50       ` Bjorn Helgaas
2024-10-01 13:12         ` Ville Syrjälä
2024-10-23 15:31     ` Ville Syrjälä
2024-09-25 14:45 ` [PATCH 2/6] drm/i915/pm: Hoist pci_save_state()+pci_set_power_state() to the end of pm _late() hook Ville Syrjala
2024-09-26 14:43   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2024-09-26 15:41     ` Ville Syrjälä
2024-09-26 16:40       ` Rodrigo Vivi [this message]
2024-09-25 14:45 ` [PATCH 3/6] drm/i915/pm: Simplify pm hook documentation Ville Syrjala
2024-09-26 14:45   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2024-09-26 15:38     ` Ville Syrjälä
2024-09-26 16:10       ` Rodrigo Vivi
2024-09-25 14:45 ` [PATCH 4/6] drm/i915/pm: Move the hibernate+D3 quirk stuff into noirq() pm hooks Ville Syrjala
2024-09-25 19:28   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2024-09-25 14:45 ` [PATCH 5/6] drm/i915/pm: Do pci_restore_state() in switcheroo resume hook Ville Syrjala
2024-09-26 14:48   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2024-09-26 15:36     ` Ville Syrjälä
2024-09-26 16:27       ` Rodrigo Vivi
2024-09-25 14:45 ` [PATCH 6/6] drm/i915/pm: Use pci_dev->skip_bus_pm for hibernate vs. D3 workaround Ville Syrjala
2024-09-25 19:28   ` Bjorn Helgaas

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZvWOgs0Y9CN3aNac@intel.com \
    --to=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).