From: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
Cc: "Keith Busch" <kbusch@meta.com>,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, bhelgaas@google.com, lukas@wunner.de,
"Jonathan Cameron" <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>,
"Davidlohr Bueso" <dave@stgolabs.net>,
"Ilpo Järvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 5/5] pci: unexport pci_walk_bus_locked
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2024 16:00:42 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZxlyCvf1DQS9GYvS@kbusch-mbp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241023214320.GA936997@bhelgaas>
On Wed, Oct 23, 2024 at 04:43:20PM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 22, 2024 at 03:48:51PM -0700, Keith Busch wrote:
> > @@ -445,7 +445,6 @@ void pci_walk_bus_locked(struct pci_bus *top, int (*cb)(struct pci_dev *, void *
> >
> > __pci_walk_bus(top, cb, userdata);
> > }
> > -EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pci_walk_bus_locked);
>
> I think we could also move the declaration from include/linux/pci.h to
> drivers/pci/pci.h, right?
>
> I guess there's some argument for keeping it in include/linux/pci.h
> next to the pci_walk_bus() declaration, but I certainly don't want to
> encourage more use of either one, especially outside the PCI core.
Thanks, that's a good point! Not only are modules not using this,
neither does any kernel code outside drivers/pci/, so no need to
declare this in include/linux/.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-23 22:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-22 22:48 [PATCHv3 0/5] pci cleanup/prep patches Keith Busch
2024-10-22 22:48 ` [PATCHv3 1/5] pci: make pci_stop_dev concurrent safe Keith Busch
2024-11-07 14:06 ` Lukas Wunner
2024-11-07 15:56 ` Keith Busch
2024-11-11 7:20 ` Lukas Wunner
2024-10-22 22:48 ` [PATCHv3 2/5] pci: make pci_destroy_dev " Keith Busch
2024-10-22 22:48 ` [PATCHv3 3/5] pci: move the walk bus lock to where its needed Keith Busch
2024-10-22 22:48 ` [PATCHv3 4/5] pci: walk bus recursively Keith Busch
2024-11-11 8:21 ` Lukas Wunner
2024-10-22 22:48 ` [PATCHv3 5/5] pci: unexport pci_walk_bus_locked Keith Busch
2024-10-23 21:43 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2024-10-23 22:00 ` Keith Busch [this message]
2024-10-23 22:07 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2024-10-23 22:20 ` [PATCHv3 0/5] pci cleanup/prep patches Bjorn Helgaas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZxlyCvf1DQS9GYvS@kbusch-mbp \
--to=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
--cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=kbusch@meta.com \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lukas@wunner.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox