public inbox for linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Niklas Cassel <cassel@kernel.org>
To: Frank Li <Frank.li@nxp.com>
Cc: "Jingoo Han" <jingoohan1@gmail.com>,
	"Manivannan Sadhasivam" <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>,
	"Lorenzo Pieralisi" <lpieralisi@kernel.org>,
	"Krzysztof Wilczyński" <kw@linux.com>,
	"Rob Herring" <robh@kernel.org>,
	"Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	"Damien Le Moal" <dlemoal@kernel.org>,
	"Jesper Nilsson" <jesper.nilsson@axis.com>,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] PCI: dwc: ep: Improve alignment check in dw_pcie_prog_ep_inbound_atu()
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2024 09:15:34 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZzcDJo_U0zz3OQe7@ryzen> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZzYxslV+c1QxsJCM@lizhi-Precision-Tower-5810>

On Thu, Nov 14, 2024 at 12:21:54PM -0500, Frank Li wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 14, 2024 at 12:03:29PM +0100, Niklas Cassel wrote:
> 
> according to patch, subject look like
> 
> "Add 'address' alignment to 'size' check in dw_pcie_prog_ep_inbound_atu()."

Sure.


> 
> > dw_pcie_prog_ep_inbound_atu() is used to program an inbound iATU in
> > "BAR Match Mode".
> >
> > While a memory address returned by kmalloc() is guaranteed to be naturally
> > aligned (aligned to the size of the allocation), it is not guaranteed that
> > the address that is supplied to pci_epc_set_bar() (and thus the addres that
> > is supplied to dw_pcie_prog_ep_inbound_atu()) is naturally aligned.
> 
> short sentence may be better
> 
> The memory address returned by kmalloc() is guaranteed to be naturally
> aligned (aligned to the size of the allocation), but it may not align when
> pass to pci_epc_set_bar().

I do not think that this is better.

The memory address returned by kmalloc() is naturally aligned, and will still
be naturally aligned when passed to pci_epc_set_bar().

The problem is if the address supplied to pci_epc_set_bar() did not come from
something that was kmalloc():ed. E.g. the ITS address.

I can rephrase this sentence to make that clearer in v2.


Kind regards,
Niklas


> 
> >
> > See the register description for IATU_LWR_TARGET_ADDR_OFF_INBOUND_i,
> > specifically fields LWR_TARGET_RW and LWR_TARGET_HW in the DWC Databook.
> >
> > "Field size depends on log2(BAR_MASK+1) in BAR match mode."
> >
> > I.e. only the upper bits are writable, and the number of writable bits is
> > dependent on the configured BAR_MASK.
> >
> > Add a check to ensure that the physical address programmed in the iATU is
> > aligned to the size of the BAR (BAR_MASK+1), as without this, we can get
> > hard to debug errors, as we could write to bits that are read-only (without
> > getting a write error), which could cause the iATU to end up redirecting to
> > a physical address that is different from the address that we intended.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Niklas Cassel <cassel@kernel.org>
> > ---
> >  drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-ep.c | 8 +++++---
> >  drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.c    | 5 +++--
> >  drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.h    | 2 +-
> >  3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-ep.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-ep.c
> > index 507e40bd18c8f..4ad6ebd2ea320 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-ep.c
> > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-ep.c
> > @@ -128,7 +128,8 @@ static int dw_pcie_ep_write_header(struct pci_epc *epc, u8 func_no, u8 vfunc_no,
> >  }
> >
> >  static int dw_pcie_ep_inbound_atu(struct dw_pcie_ep *ep, u8 func_no, int type,
> > -				  dma_addr_t cpu_addr, enum pci_barno bar)
> > +				  dma_addr_t cpu_addr, enum pci_barno bar,
> > +				  size_t size)
> >  {
> >  	int ret;
> >  	u32 free_win;
> > @@ -145,7 +146,7 @@ static int dw_pcie_ep_inbound_atu(struct dw_pcie_ep *ep, u8 func_no, int type,
> >  	}
> >
> >  	ret = dw_pcie_prog_ep_inbound_atu(pci, func_no, free_win, type,
> > -					  cpu_addr, bar);
> > +					  cpu_addr, bar, size);
> >  	if (ret < 0) {
> >  		dev_err(pci->dev, "Failed to program IB window\n");
> >  		return ret;
> > @@ -229,7 +230,8 @@ static int dw_pcie_ep_set_bar(struct pci_epc *epc, u8 func_no, u8 vfunc_no,
> >  	else
> >  		type = PCIE_ATU_TYPE_IO;
> >
> > -	ret = dw_pcie_ep_inbound_atu(ep, func_no, type, epf_bar->phys_addr, bar);
> > +	ret = dw_pcie_ep_inbound_atu(ep, func_no, type, epf_bar->phys_addr, bar,
> > +				     size);
> >  	if (ret)
> >  		return ret;
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.c
> > index 6d6cbc8b5b2c6..3c683b6119c39 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.c
> > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.c
> > @@ -597,11 +597,12 @@ int dw_pcie_prog_inbound_atu(struct dw_pcie *pci, int index, int type,
> >  }
> >
> >  int dw_pcie_prog_ep_inbound_atu(struct dw_pcie *pci, u8 func_no, int index,
> > -				int type, u64 cpu_addr, u8 bar)
> > +				int type, u64 cpu_addr, u8 bar, size_t size)
> >  {
> >  	u32 retries, val;
> >
> > -	if (!IS_ALIGNED(cpu_addr, pci->region_align))
> > +	if (!IS_ALIGNED(cpu_addr, pci->region_align) ||
> > +	    !IS_ALIGNED(cpu_addr, size))
> >  		return -EINVAL;
> >
> >  	dw_pcie_writel_atu_ib(pci, index, PCIE_ATU_LOWER_TARGET,
> > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.h b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.h
> > index 347ab74ac35aa..fc08727116725 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.h
> > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.h
> > @@ -491,7 +491,7 @@ int dw_pcie_prog_outbound_atu(struct dw_pcie *pci,
> >  int dw_pcie_prog_inbound_atu(struct dw_pcie *pci, int index, int type,
> >  			     u64 cpu_addr, u64 pci_addr, u64 size);
> >  int dw_pcie_prog_ep_inbound_atu(struct dw_pcie *pci, u8 func_no, int index,
> > -				int type, u64 cpu_addr, u8 bar);
> > +				int type, u64 cpu_addr, u8 bar, size_t size);
> >  void dw_pcie_disable_atu(struct dw_pcie *pci, u32 dir, int index);
> >  void dw_pcie_setup(struct dw_pcie *pci);
> >  void dw_pcie_iatu_detect(struct dw_pcie *pci);
> > --
> > 2.47.0
> >

      reply	other threads:[~2024-11-15  8:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-11-14 11:03 [PATCH 0/3] PCI endpoint additional pci_epc_set_bar() checks Niklas Cassel
2024-11-14 11:03 ` [PATCH 1/3] PCI: artpec6: Implement dw_pcie_ep operation get_features Niklas Cassel
2024-11-14 17:04   ` Frank Li
2024-11-14 11:03 ` [PATCH 2/3] PCI: endpoint: Add size check for fixed size BARs in pci_epc_set_bar() Niklas Cassel
2024-11-14 17:06   ` Frank Li
2024-11-14 11:03 ` [PATCH 3/3] PCI: dwc: ep: Improve alignment check in dw_pcie_prog_ep_inbound_atu() Niklas Cassel
2024-11-14 17:21   ` Frank Li
2024-11-15  8:15     ` Niklas Cassel [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZzcDJo_U0zz3OQe7@ryzen \
    --to=cassel@kernel.org \
    --cc=Frank.li@nxp.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=dlemoal@kernel.org \
    --cc=jesper.nilsson@axis.com \
    --cc=jingoohan1@gmail.com \
    --cc=kw@linux.com \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
    --cc=manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox