From: Eric Auger <eauger@redhat.com>
To: "Ilpo Järvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
Dominik Brodowski <linux@dominikbrodowski.net>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Myron Stowe <myron.stowe@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 13/23] PCI: Add pbus_mem_size_optional() to handle optional sizes
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2026 10:48:47 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a68a6fef-958f-453a-8fc1-6ccbb2a8f801@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <24d4df44-45e0-4275-5ea9-196fd0af556d@linux.intel.com>
Hi Ilpo,
On 7/10/26 2:43 PM, Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
> On Thu, 9 Jul 2026, Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 9 Jul 2026, Eric Auger wrote:
>>> On 7/9/26 11:04 AM, Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
>>>> On Wed, 8 Jul 2026, Eric Auger wrote:
>>>>> On 7/8/26 4:05 PM, Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
>>>>>> On Wed, 8 Jul 2026, Eric Auger wrote:
>>>>>>> On 7/7/26 6:12 PM, Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Tue, 7 Jul 2026, Eric Auger wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hi Ilpo,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 12/19/25 6:40 PM, Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> The resource loop in pbus_size_mem() handles optional resources that
>>>>>>>>>> are either fully optional (SRIOV and disabled Expansion ROMs) or bridge
>>>>>>>>>> windows that may be optional only for a part. The logic is little
>>>>>>>>>> inconsistent when it comes to a bridge window that has only optional
>>>>>>>>>> children resources as it would be more natural to treat it similar to
>>>>>>>>>> any fully optional resource. As resource size should be zero in that
>>>>>>>>>> case, it shouldn't cause any bugs but it still seems useful to address
>>>>>>>>>> the inconsistency.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Place the optional size related code of pbus_size_mem() into
>>>>>>>>>> pbus_mem_size_optional() and add check into pci_resource_is_optional()
>>>>>>>>>> for entirely optional bridge windows. Reorder the logic inside
>>>>>>>>>> pbus_mem_size_optional() such that fully optional resources are handled
>>>>>>>>>> the same irrespective to whether the resource is a bridge window or
>>>>>>>>>> not.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> This patch seems to introduce a regression when trying to hotplug a
>>>>>>>>> virtio-net-pci device behind a XIO3130 downstream port in the following
>>>>>>>>> hierarchy.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> this happens with a v7.2-rc2 guest kernel, on an arm64 guest with qemu vmm.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 00:01.0 Host bridge: Red Hat, Inc. QEMU PCIe Expander bridge
>>>>>>>>> Subsystem: Red Hat, Inc. Device 1100
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> |_ 0a:00.0 PCI bridge: Red Hat, Inc. QEMU PCIe Root port
>>>>>>>>> Subsystem: Red Hat, Inc. Device 0000
>>>>>>>>> Kernel driver in use: pcieport
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> |_ 0b:00.0 PCI bridge: Texas Instruments XIO3130 PCI Express Switch
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> (Upstream) (rev 02)
>>>>>>>>> Kernel driver in use: pcieport
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> |_ 0c:02.0 PCI bridge: Texas Instruments XIO3130 PCI Express
>>>>>>>>> Switch (Downstream) (rev 01)
>>>>>>>>> Kernel driver in use: pcieport
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi Eric,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks for the report.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I cannot get much done with the log snippets. The first line with
>>>>>>>> difference is a symptom of something that originates from outside of the
>>>>>>>> snippet.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Could you please take a log with dyndbg="file drivers/pci/*.c +p" on the
>>>>>>>> kernel command line and also include a /proc/iomem dump. Like
>>>>>>>> you did now, preferrably take those from both working and failing case so
>>>>>>>> I can easily diff them.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> i.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> This produces the following trace
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> [ 28.557947] pcieport 0000:0c:02.0: pciehp: Slot(0-1): Card present
>>>>>>>>> [ 28.557949] pcieport 0000:0c:02.0: pciehp: Slot(0-1): Link Up
>>>>>>>>> [ 29.605376] pci 0000:0d:00.0: [1af4:1041] type 00 class 0x020000 PCIe
>>>>>>>>> Endpoint
>>>>>>>>> [ 29.605724] pci 0000:0d:00.0: BAR 1 [mem 0x00000000-0x00000fff]
>>>>>>>>> [ 29.605765] pci 0000:0d:00.0: BAR 4 [mem 0x00000000-0x00003fff 64bit
>>>>>>>>> pref]
>>>>>>>>> [ 29.605816] pci 0000:0d:00.0: enabling Extended Tags
>>>>>>>>> [ 29.606994] pcieport 0000:0c:02.0: bridge window [mem size 0x00100000
>>>>>>>>> 64bit pref] to [bus 0d] add_size 100000 add_align 100000
>>>>>>>>> [ 29.606998] pcieport 0000:0c:02.0: bridge window [mem size
>>>>>>>>> 0x00100000] to [bus 0d] add_size 100000 add_align 100000
>>>>>>>>> [ 29.607003] pcieport 0000:0c:02.0: bridge window [mem size
>>>>>>>>> 0x00200000]: can't assign; no space
>>>>>>>>> [ 29.607005] pcieport 0000:0c:02.0: bridge window [mem size
>>>>>>>>> 0x00200000]: failed to assign
>>>>>>>>> [ 29.607007] pcieport 0000:0c:02.0: bridge window [mem size 0x00200000
>>>>>>>>> 64bit pref]: can't assign; no space
>>>>>>>>> [ 29.607008] pcieport 0000:0c:02.0: bridge window [mem size 0x00200000
>>>>>>>>> 64bit pref]: failed to assign
>>>>>>>>> [ 29.607010] pcieport 0000:0c:02.0: bridge window [io size 0x1000]:
>>>>>>>>> can't assign; no space
>>>>>>>>> [ 29.607012] pcieport 0000:0c:02.0: bridge window [io size 0x1000]:
>>>>>>>>> failed to assign
>>>>>>>>> [ 29.607014] pcieport 0000:0c:02.0: bridge window [mem size
>>>>>>>>> 0x00100000]: can't assign; no space
>>>>>>>>> [ 29.607016] pcieport 0000:0c:02.0: bridge window [mem size
>>>>>>>>> 0x00100000]: failed to assign
>>>>>>>>> [ 29.607018] pcieport 0000:0c:02.0: bridge window [mem size 0x00100000
>>>>>>>>> 64bit pref]: can't assign; no space
>>>>>>>>> [ 29.607019] pcieport 0000:0c:02.0: bridge window [mem size 0x00100000
>>>>>>>>> 64bit pref]: failed to assign
>>>>>>>>> [ 29.607021] pcieport 0000:0c:02.0: bridge window [io size 0x1000]:
>>>>>>>>> can't assign; no space
>>>>>>>>> [ 29.607022] pcieport 0000:0c:02.0: bridge window [io size 0x1000]:
>>>>>>>>> failed to assign
>>>>>>>>> [ 29.607025] pci 0000:0d:00.0: BAR 4 [mem size 0x00004000 64bit pref]:
>>>>>>>>> can't assign; no space
>>>>>>>>> [ 29.607026] pci 0000:0d:00.0: BAR 4 [mem size 0x00004000 64bit pref]:
>>>>>>>>> failed to assign
>>>>>>>>> [ 29.607027] pci 0000:0d:00.0: BAR 1 [mem size 0x00001000]: can't
>>>>>>>>> assign; no space
>>>>>>>>> [ 29.607028] pci 0000:0d:00.0: BAR 1 [mem size 0x00001000]: failed to
>>>>>>>>> assign
>>>>>>>>> [ 29.607029] pci 0000:0d:00.0: BAR 4 [mem size 0x00004000 64bit pref]:
>>>>>>>>> can't assign; no space
>>>>>>>>> [ 29.607030] pci 0000:0d:00.0: BAR 4 [mem size 0x00004000 64bit pref]:
>>>>>>>>> failed to assign
>>>>>>>>> [ 29.607031] pci 0000:0d:00.0: BAR 1 [mem size 0x00001000]: can't
>>>>>>>>> assign; no space
>>>>>>>>> [ 29.607032] pci 0000:0d:00.0: BAR 1 [mem size 0x00001000]: failed to
>>>>>>>>> assign
>>>>>>>>> [ 29.607033] pcieport 0000:0c:02.0: PCI bridge to [bus 0d]
>>>>>>>>> [ 29.611260] PCI: No. 2 try to assign unassigned res
>>>>>>>>> [ 29.611269] pcieport 0000:0c:02.0: bridge window [mem size 0x00100000
>>>>>>>>> 64bit pref] to [bus 0d] add_size 100000 add_align 100000
>>>>>>>>> [ 29.611272] pcieport 0000:0c:02.0: bridge window [mem size
>>>>>>>>> 0x00100000] to [bus 0d] add_size 100000 add_align 100000
>>>>>>>>> [ 29.611276] pcieport 0000:0c:02.0: bridge window [mem size
>>>>>>>>> 0x00200000]: can't assign; no space
>>>>>>>>> [ 29.611277] pcieport 0000:0c:02.0: bridge window [mem size
>>>>>>>>> 0x00200000]: failed to assign
>>>>>>>>> [ 29.611278] pcieport 0000:0c:02.0: bridge window [mem size 0x00200000
>>>>>>>>> 64bit pref]: can't assign; no space
>>>>>>>>> [ 29.611279] pcieport 0000:0c:02.0: bridge window [mem size 0x00200000
>>>>>>>>> 64bit pref]: failed to assign
>>>>>>>>> [ 29.611280] pcieport 0000:0c:02.0: bridge window [io size 0x1000]:
>>>>>>>>> can't assign; no space
>>>>>>>>> [ 29.611280] pcieport 0000:0c:02.0: bridge window [io size 0x1000]:
>>>>>>>>> failed to assign
>>>>>>>>> [ 29.611281] pcieport 0000:0c:02.0: bridge window [mem size
>>>>>>>>> 0x00100000]: can't assign; no space
>>>>>>>>> [ 29.611282] pcieport 0000:0c:02.0: bridge window [mem size
>>>>>>>>> 0x00100000]: failed to assign
>>>>>>>>> [ 29.611283] pcieport 0000:0c:02.0: bridge window [mem size 0x00100000
>>>>>>>>> 64bit pref]: can't assign; no space
>>>>>>>>> [ 29.611283] pcieport 0000:0c:02.0: bridge window [mem size 0x00100000
>>>>>>>>> 64bit pref]: failed to assign
>>>>>>>>> [ 29.611284] pcieport 0000:0c:02.0: bridge window [io size 0x1000]:
>>>>>>>>> can't assign; no space
>>>>>>>>> [ 29.611284] pcieport 0000:0c:02.0: bridge window [io size 0x1000]:
>>>>>>>>> failed to assign
>>>>>>>>> [ 29.611286] pci 0000:0d:00.0: BAR 4 [mem size 0x00004000 64bit pref]:
>>>>>>>>> can't assign; no space
>>>>>>>>> [ 29.611286] pci 0000:0d:00.0: BAR 4 [mem size 0x00004000 64bit pref]:
>>>>>>>>> failed to assign
>>>>>>>>> [ 29.611287] pci 0000:0d:00.0: BAR 1 [mem size 0x00001000]: can't
>>>>>>>>> assign; no space
>>>>>>>>> [ 29.611288] pci 0000:0d:00.0: BAR 1 [mem size 0x00001000]: failed to
>>>>>>>>> assign
>>>>>>>>> [ 29.611288] pci 0000:0d:00.0: BAR 4 [mem size 0x00004000 64bit pref]:
>>>>>>>>> can't assign; no space
>>>>>>>>> [ 29.611289] pci 0000:0d:00.0: BAR 4 [mem size 0x00004000 64bit pref]:
>>>>>>>>> failed to assign
>>>>>>>>> [ 29.611289] pci 0000:0d:00.0: BAR 1 [mem size 0x00001000]: can't
>>>>>>>>> assign; no space
>>>>>>>>> [ 29.611290] pci 0000:0d:00.0: BAR 1 [mem size 0x00001000]: failed to
>>>>>>>>> assign
>>>>>>>>> [ 29.611291] pcieport 0000:0c:02.0: PCI bridge to [bus 0d]
>>>>>>>>> [ 29.616141] ACPI: \_SB_.L0A2: Enabled at IRQ 37
>>>>>>>>> [ 29.616378] virtio-pci 0000:0d:00.0: virtio_pci: leaving for legacy
>>>>>>>>> driver
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Previous to this commit hotplug was successful:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> vm-rhel10 login: [ 38.385692] pcieport 0000:0c:02.0: pciehp:
>>>>>>>>> Slot(0-1): Button press: will power on in 5 sec
>>>>>>>>> [ 38.385798] pcieport 0000:0c:02.0: pciehp: Slot(0-1): Card present
>>>>>>>>> [ 38.385799] pcieport 0000:0c:02.0: pciehp: Slot(0-1): Link Up
>>>>>>>>> [ 39.553709] pci 0000:0d:00.0: [1af4:1041] type 00 class 0x020000 PCIe
>>>>>>>>> Endpoint
>>>>>>>>> [ 39.554018] pci 0000:0d:00.0: BAR 1 [mem 0x00000000-0x00000fff]
>>>>>>>>> [ 39.554042] pci 0000:0d:00.0: BAR 4 [mem 0x00000000-0x00003fff 64bit
>>>>>>>>> pref]
>>>>>>>>> [ 39.554099] pci 0000:0d:00.0: enabling Extended Tags
>>>>>>>>> [ 39.555202] pcieport 0000:0c:02.0: bridge window [mem size 0x00100000
>>>>>>>>> 64bit pref] to [bus 0d] add_size 100000 add_align 100000
>>>>>>>>> [ 39.555206] pcieport 0000:0c:02.0: bridge window [mem size
>>>>>>>>> 0x00100000] to [bus 0d] add_size 100000 add_align 100000
>>>>>>>>> [ 39.555212] pcieport 0000:0c:02.0: bridge window [mem size
>>>>>>>>> 0x00200000]: can't assign; no space
>>>>>>>>> [ 39.555213] pcieport 0000:0c:02.0: bridge window [mem size
>>>>>>>>> 0x00200000]: failed to assign
>>>>>>>>> [ 39.555215] pcieport 0000:0c:02.0: bridge window [mem size 0x00200000
>>>>>>>>> 64bit pref]: can't assign; no space
>>>>>>>>> [ 39.555216] pcieport 0000:0c:02.0: bridge window [mem size 0x00200000
>>>>>>>>> 64bit pref]: failed to assign
>>>>>>>>> [ 39.555218] pcieport 0000:0c:02.0: bridge window [io size 0x1000]:
>>>>>>>>> can't assign; no space
>>>>>>>>> [ 39.555219] pcieport 0000:0c:02.0: bridge window [io size 0x1000]:
>>>>>>>>> failed to assign
>>>>>>>>> [ 39.555222] pcieport 0000:0c:02.0: bridge window [mem
>>>>>>>>> 0x10a00000-0x10afffff]: assigned
>>>>>>>>> [ 39.555224] pcieport 0000:0c:02.0: bridge window [mem
>>>>>>>>> 0x10b00000-0x10bfffff 64bit pref]: assigned
>>>>>>>>> [ 39.555225] pcieport 0000:0c:02.0: bridge window [io size 0x1000]:
>>>>>>>>> can't assign; no space
>>>>>>>>> [ 39.555227] pcieport 0000:0c:02.0: bridge window [io size 0x1000]:
>>>>>>>>> failed to assign
>>>>>>>>> [ 39.555228] pcieport 0000:0c:02.0: bridge window [mem
>>>>>>>>> 0x10a00000-0x10afffff]: failed to expand by 0x100000
>>>>>>>>> [ 39.555230] pcieport 0000:0c:02.0: bridge window [mem
>>>>>>>>> 0x10a00000-0x10afffff]: failed to add optional 100000
>>>>>>>>> [ 39.555232] pcieport 0000:0c:02.0: bridge window [mem
>>>>>>>>> 0x10b00000-0x10bfffff 64bit pref]: failed to expand by 0x100000
>>>>>>>>> [ 39.555234] pcieport 0000:0c:02.0: bridge window [mem
>>>>>>>>> 0x10b00000-0x10bfffff 64bit pref]: failed to add optional 100000
>>>>>>>>> [ 39.555236] pci 0000:0d:00.0: BAR 4 [mem 0x10b00000-0x10b03fff 64bit
>>>>>>>>> pref]: assigned
>>>>>>>>> [ 39.555290] pci 0000:0d:00.0: BAR 1 [mem 0x10a00000-0x10a00fff]: assigned
>>>>>>>>> [ 39.555305] pcieport 0000:0c:02.0: PCI bridge to [bus 0d]
>>>>>>>>> [ 39.556804] pcieport 0000:0c:02.0: bridge window [mem
>>>>>>>>> 0x10a00000-0x10afffff]
>>>>>>>>> [ 39.557730] pcieport 0000:0c:02.0: bridge window [mem
>>>>>>>>> 0x10b00000-0x10bfffff 64bit pref]
>>>>>>>>> [ 39.559629] PCI: No. 2 try to assign unassigned res
>>>>>>>>> [ 39.559636] pcieport 0000:0c:02.0: bridge window [io size 0x1000]:
>>>>>>>>> can't assign; no space
>>>>>>>>> [ 39.559638] pcieport 0000:0c:02.0: bridge window [io size 0x1000]:
>>>>>>>>> failed to assign
>>>>>>>>> [ 39.559640] pcieport 0000:0c:02.0: bridge window [io size 0x1000]:
>>>>>>>>> can't assign; no space
>>>>>>>>> [ 39.559642] pcieport 0000:0c:02.0: bridge window [io size 0x1000]:
>>>>>>>>> failed to assign
>>>>>>>>> [ 39.559644] pcieport 0000:0c:02.0: PCI bridge to [bus 0d]
>>>>>>>>> [ 39.561078] pcieport 0000:0c:02.0: bridge window [mem
>>>>>>>>> 0x10a00000-0x10afffff]
>>>>>>>>> [ 39.562011] pcieport 0000:0c:02.0: bridge window [mem
>>>>>>>>> 0x10b00000-0x10bfffff 64bit pref]
>>>>>>>>> [ 39.564500] ACPI: \_SB_.L0A2: Enabled at IRQ 37
>>>>>>>>> [ 39.564541] virtio-pci 0000:0d:00.0: enabling device (0000 -> 0002)
>>>>>>>>> [ 39.572231] virtio_net virtio2 enp13s0: renamed from eth0
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Any clue?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Thank you in advance
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Eric
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Additional motivation for this are the upcoming changes that add
>>>>>>>>>> complexity to the optional sizing logic due to Resizable BAR awareness.
>>>>>>>>>> The extra logic would exceed any reasonable indentation level if the
>>>>>>>>>> optional sizing code is kept within the loop body.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
>>>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>>>> drivers/pci/setup-bus.c | 77 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
>>>>>>>>>> 1 file changed, 54 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/setup-bus.c b/drivers/pci/setup-bus.c
>>>>>>>>>> index 3d1d3cefcdba..3fcc7641c374 100644
>>>>>>>>>> --- a/drivers/pci/setup-bus.c
>>>>>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/pci/setup-bus.c
>>>>>>>>>> @@ -125,15 +125,6 @@ static resource_size_t get_res_add_size(struct list_head *head,
>>>>>>>>>> return dev_res ? dev_res->add_size : 0;
>>>>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> -static resource_size_t get_res_add_align(struct list_head *head,
>>>>>>>>>> - struct resource *res)
>>>>>>>>>> -{
>>>>>>>>>> - struct pci_dev_resource *dev_res;
>>>>>>>>>> -
>>>>>>>>>> - dev_res = res_to_dev_res(head, res);
>>>>>>>>>> - return dev_res ? dev_res->min_align : 0;
>>>>>>>>>> -}
>>>>>>>>>> -
>>>>>>>>>> static void restore_dev_resource(struct pci_dev_resource *dev_res)
>>>>>>>>>> {
>>>>>>>>>> struct resource *res = dev_res->res;
>>>>>>>>>> @@ -386,6 +377,8 @@ bool pci_resource_is_optional(const struct pci_dev *dev, int resno)
>>>>>>>>>> return true;
>>>>>>>>>> if (resno == PCI_ROM_RESOURCE && !(res->flags & IORESOURCE_ROM_ENABLE))
>>>>>>>>>> return true;
>>>>>>>>>> + if (pci_resource_is_bridge_win(resno) && !resource_size(res))
>>>>>>> adding
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> && !dev->is_hotplug_bridge makes the hotplug successful.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> My understanding is that otherwise the hotplug bridge window is
>>>>>>> considered as optional and no memoy window is allocated to assign chid
>>>>>>> device's BARS
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Please let me know if that makes sense. In the positive I can send a patch.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I don't think that is the correct solution.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> These bridges, have both non-prefetchable and prefetchable windows, but
>>>>>> the initial setup only sets the non-prefetchable one to 2M (and nothing
>>>>>> more would fit to the associated root bus resource). There's only a single
>>>>>> root bus resource that is 2M + a bit more (to fit that BAR0).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Now, when sizing the bridge windows, the kernel sizing algorithm just uses
>>>>>> the default 2M hotplug reservation to both of those windows as there are
>>>>>> not yet any real devices underneath (the default hp reservation is
>>>>>> controllable with hpmmiosize/hpmmioprefsize/hpmemsize cmdline parameters).
>>>>>> Thus, to fit everything, the root bus resource should be 4M + a bit more
>>>>>> for BAR0.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> However, it looks to me there's also a 4M add_size miscalculation (the
>>>>>> downstream bridge window is only 2M per each type):
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [ 0.048078] pci 0000:0a:00.0: bridge window [mem 0x00100000-0x000fffff 64bit pref] to [bus 0b-0d] add_size 400000 add_align 100000
>>>>>> [ 0.048079] pci 0000:0a:00.0: bridge window [mem 0x00100000-0x000fffff] to [bus 0b-0d] add_size 400000 add_align 100000
>>>>>
>>>>> Hum even with the patch below I still get:
>>>>>
>>>>> [ 0.047253] pci 0000:0a:00.0: bridge window [mem
>>>>> 0x00100000-0x000fffff 64bit pref] to [bus 0b-0d] add_size 400000
>>>>> add_align 100000
>>>>> [ 0.047254] pci 0000:0a:00.0: bridge window [mem
>>>>> 0x00100000-0x000fffff] to [bus 0b-0d] add_size 400000 add_align 100000
>>>
>>> If I comment the continue in the block hereafter in pbus_size_mem() it
>>> works.
>>
>> Many changes may appear working, but that doesn't necessarily make them
>> correct. The behavior with the older "working" kernel included that pulled
>> mandatory 1M sizes out of thin air and just happened to succeed with those
>> sizes to let your hotplug scenario to "work". It's still just numbers
>> pulled out of thin air (not derived from downstream resource sizes).
>>
>>> if (pbus_size_mem_optional(dev, i, align,
>>> realloc_head, &add_align,
>>> &children_add_size)) {
>>> //continue;
>>> }
>>>
>>> Given r_size == 0, this allows to set aligns[order] += align;
>>>
>>> isn't it requested for the parent bridges (the Root Port and Switch
>>> Upstream port) to see the downstream alignment requirements and map them
>>> out on boot?
>>
>> It needs to be flexible. When not everything fits some things are more
>> important than others (aka. optional). On of such things is hotplug
>> reservation. If you'd change that behavior of the algorithm, be my guest
>> to fix all the brokenness that will ensue. ;-)
>>
>> This here is the sizing algorithm. The actual assignments are done in a
>> different phase, and they try first with optional parts included but if
>> that fails, the algorithm falls back to first allocation all mandatory
>> resources, and then as many optional ones as it can.
>>
>> (It seems I need to figure out why my debug patch does appear to be doing
>> anything tomorrow.)
>
> Hi again,
>
> Apparently there was nothing wrong with it, just all resources in the
> system I tested with were claimed earlier (by arch code, I suppose) so
> there was nothing left to do for pbus_size_mem().
>
> Here's the patch that should reveal what is calculated into each bridge
> window. If there's an add_size 200000 row (or 100000 if you change the
> reservation) without any "adding" entries it implies all memory is just
> hp reservation.
>
> It may print the same resource more than once in some cases but I didn't
> want to spend my time on optimizing that part too much for a debug patch.
>
> [DEBUG PATCH 1/1] PCI: Add debug print to show bridge window components
>
> It's not always possible to know what going into final bridge window
> size/add_size calculation. Thus, add a debug print to show all
> resources processed by the size summing loop in pbus_size_mem().
>
> NOT INTENDED FOR UPSTREAM IN CURRENT FORM.
Thanks for the debug patch. I sent you the guest console separately.
Best Regards
Eric
>
> Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/pci/setup-bus.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/setup-bus.c b/drivers/pci/setup-bus.c
> index c0a949f2c995..67410ee8eb82 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/setup-bus.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/setup-bus.c
> @@ -1215,7 +1215,8 @@ static resource_size_t calculate_head_align(resource_size_t *aligns,
> *
> * Return: %true if the resource is entirely optional.
> */
> -static bool pbus_size_mem_optional(struct pci_dev *dev, int resno,
> +static bool pbus_size_mem_optional(struct pci_bus *bus, struct resource *b_res,
> + struct pci_dev *dev, int resno,
> resource_size_t align,
> struct list_head *realloc_head,
> resource_size_t *add_align,
> @@ -1242,6 +1243,17 @@ static bool pbus_size_mem_optional(struct pci_dev *dev, int resno,
> }
> }
>
> + if (bus->self) {
> + const char *r_name = pci_resource_name(dev, resno);
> +
> + pci_dbg(bus->self, "%pR: adding %s: %s %pR size %llx + %llx align %llx/%llx\n",
> + b_res, pci_name(dev), r_name, res,
> + (unsigned long long)r_size,
> + (unsigned long long)(dev_res ? dev_res->add_size : 0),
> + (unsigned long long)align,
> + (unsigned long long)(dev_res ? dev_res->min_align : 0));
> + }
> +
> if (!optional)
> return false;
>
> @@ -1325,7 +1337,7 @@ static void pbus_size_mem(struct pci_bus *bus, struct resource *b_res,
> continue;
> }
>
> - if (pbus_size_mem_optional(dev, i, align,
> + if (pbus_size_mem_optional(bus, b_res, dev, i, align,
> realloc_head, &add_align,
> &children_add_size))
> continue;
> @@ -1333,6 +1345,13 @@ static void pbus_size_mem(struct pci_bus *bus, struct resource *b_res,
> r_size = resource_size(r);
> size += max(r_size, align);
>
> + if (bus->self) {
> + pci_dbg(bus->self, "%pR: adding %s: %s %pR size %llx align %llx\n",
> + b_res, pci_name(dev), r_name, r,
> + (unsigned long long)r_size,
> + (unsigned long long)align);
> + }
> +
> /*
> * If resource's size is larger than its alignment,
> * some configurations result in an unwanted gap in
>
> base-commit: dc59e4fea9d83f03bad6bddf3fa2e52491777482
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-13 8:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-12-19 17:40 [PATCH 00/23] PCI: Resource code fixes (supercedes earlier series) & cleanups Ilpo Järvinen
2025-12-19 17:40 ` [PATCH 01/23] PCI: Fix bridge window alignment with optional resources Ilpo Järvinen
2025-12-19 17:40 ` [PATCH 02/23] PCI: Rewrite bridge window head alignment function Ilpo Järvinen
2026-01-26 22:17 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2026-01-27 11:22 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2026-01-27 22:39 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-12-19 17:40 ` [PATCH 03/23] PCI: Stop over-estimating bridge window size Ilpo Järvinen
2026-03-05 15:13 ` Guenter Roeck
2026-03-05 16:28 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2025-12-19 17:40 ` [PATCH 04/23] resource: Increase MAX_IORES_LEVEL to 8 Ilpo Järvinen
2025-12-19 17:40 ` [PATCH 05/23] PCI: Remove old_size limit from bridge window sizing Ilpo Järvinen
2026-01-26 17:16 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2026-01-26 20:09 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2026-01-27 11:39 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2026-01-27 22:42 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2026-01-27 10:16 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2025-12-19 17:40 ` [PATCH 06/23] PCI: Push realloc check into pbus_size_mem() Ilpo Järvinen
2025-12-19 17:40 ` [PATCH 07/23] PCI: Pass bridge window resource to pbus_size_mem() Ilpo Järvinen
2025-12-19 17:40 ` [PATCH 08/23] PCI: Use res_to_dev_res() in reassign_resources_sorted() Ilpo Järvinen
2025-12-19 17:40 ` [PATCH 09/23] PCI: Fetch dev_res to local var in __assign_resources_sorted() Ilpo Järvinen
2025-12-19 17:40 ` [PATCH 10/23] PCI: Add pci_resource_is_bridge_win() Ilpo Järvinen
2025-12-19 17:40 ` [PATCH 11/23] PCI: Log reset and restore of resources Ilpo Järvinen
2025-12-19 17:40 ` [PATCH 12/23] PCI: Check invalid align earlier in pbus_size_mem() Ilpo Järvinen
2025-12-19 17:40 ` [PATCH 13/23] PCI: Add pbus_mem_size_optional() to handle optional sizes Ilpo Järvinen
2026-07-07 15:42 ` Eric Auger
2026-07-07 16:12 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2026-07-08 8:08 ` Eric Auger
2026-07-08 9:28 ` Eric Auger
2026-07-08 14:05 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2026-07-08 15:39 ` Eric Auger
2026-07-09 9:04 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2026-07-09 14:29 ` Eric Auger
2026-07-09 14:50 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2026-07-10 12:43 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2026-07-13 8:48 ` Eric Auger [this message]
2025-12-19 17:40 ` [PATCH 14/23] resource: Mark res given to resource_assigned() as const Ilpo Järvinen
2025-12-19 17:47 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2025-12-19 17:40 ` [PATCH 15/23] PCI: Use resource_assigned() in setup-bus.c algorithm Ilpo Järvinen
2025-12-19 17:40 ` [PATCH 16/23] PCI: Properly prefix struct pci_dev_resource handling functions Ilpo Järvinen
2025-12-19 17:40 ` [PATCH 17/23] PCI: Separate cardbus setup & build it only with CONFIG_CARDBUS Ilpo Järvinen
2025-12-19 17:40 ` [PATCH 18/23] PCI: Handle CardBus specific params in setup-cardbus.c Ilpo Järvinen
2025-12-19 17:40 ` [PATCH 19/23] PCI: Use scnprintf() instead of sprintf() Ilpo Järvinen
2025-12-19 17:40 ` [PATCH 20/23] PCI: Add Bus Number + Secondary Latency Timer as dword fields Ilpo Järvinen
2025-12-19 17:40 ` [PATCH 21/23] PCI: Convert to use Bus Number field defines Ilpo Järvinen
2025-12-19 17:40 ` [PATCH 22/23] PCI: Add pbus_validate_busn() for Bus Number validation Ilpo Järvinen
2025-12-19 17:40 ` [PATCH 23/23] PCI: Move scanbus bridge scanning to setup-cardbus.c Ilpo Järvinen
2026-01-26 17:39 ` [PATCH 00/23] PCI: Resource code fixes (supercedes earlier series) & cleanups Bjorn Helgaas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a68a6fef-958f-453a-8fc1-6ccbb2a8f801@redhat.com \
--to=eauger@redhat.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@dominikbrodowski.net \
--cc=myron.stowe@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox