From: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@redhat.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@kernel.org>,
Philipp Stanner <pstanner@redhat.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>,
Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>,
Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>,
Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@linux.ibm.com>,
Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>, John Sanpe <sanpeqf@gmail.com>,
Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>,
Yury Norov <yury.norov@gmail.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
David Gow <davidgow@google.com>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"wuqiang.matt" <wuqiang.matt@bytedance.com>,
Jason Baron <jbaron@akamai.com>,
Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] lib/iomap.c: improve comment about pci anomaly
Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2023 20:08:27 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a6ef92ae-0747-435b-822d-d0229da4683c@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a9ab9976-c1e0-4f91-b17f-e5bbbf21def3@app.fastmail.com>
Hi Arnd,
On 11/21/23 11:03, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 20, 2023, at 22:59, Philipp Stanner wrote:
>> lib/iomap.c contains one of the definitions of pci_iounmap(). The
>> current comment above this out-of-place function does not clarify WHY
>> the function is defined here.
>>
>> Linus's detailed comment above pci_iounmap() in drivers/pci/iomap.c
>> clarifies that in a far better way.
>>
>> Extend the existing comment with an excerpt from Linus's and hint at the
>> other implementation in drivers/pci/iomap.c
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Philipp Stanner <pstanner@redhat.com>
>
> I think instead of explaining why the code is so complicated
> here, I'd prefer to make it more logical and not have to
> explain it.
>
> We should be able to define a generic version like
>
> void pci_iounmap(struct pci_dev *dev, void __iomem * addr)
Let's shed some light on the different config options related to this.
To me it looks like GENERIC_IOMAP always implies GENERIC_PCI_IOMAP.
lib/iomap.c contains a definition of pci_iounmap() since it uses the
common IO_COND() macro. This definitions wins if GENERIC_IOMAP was
selected.
lib/pci_iomap.c contains another definition of pci_iounmap() which is
guarded by ARCH_WANTS_GENERIC_PCI_IOUNMAP to prevent multiple definitions
in case either GENERIC_IOMAP is set or the architecture already defined
pci_iounmap().
What's the purpose of not having set ARCH_HAS_GENERIC_IOPORT_MAP producing
an empty definition of pci_iounmap() though [1]?
And more generally, is there any other (subtle) logic behind this?
[1] https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/latest/source/lib/pci_iomap.c#L167
> {
> #ifdef CONFIG_HAS_IOPORT
> if (iomem_is_ioport(addr)) {
> ioport_unmap(addr);
> return;
> }
> #endif
> iounmap(addr)
> }
>
> and then define iomem_is_ioport() in lib/iomap.c for x86,
> while defining it in asm-generic/io.h for the rest,
> with an override in asm/io.h for those architectures
> that need a custom inb().
So, that would be similar to IO_COND(), right? What would we need inb() for
in this context?
- Danilo
>
> Note that with ia64 gone, GENERIC_IOMAP is not at all
> generic any more and could just move it to x86 or name
> it something else. This is what currently uses it:
>
> arch/hexagon/Kconfig: select GENERIC_IOMAP
> arch/um/Kconfig: select GENERIC_IOMAP
>
> These have no port I/O at all, so it doesn't do anything.
>
> arch/m68k/Kconfig: select GENERIC_IOMAP
>
> on m68knommu, the default implementation from asm-generic/io.h
> as the same effect as GENERIC_IOMAP but is more efficient.
> On classic m68k, GENERIC_IOMAP does not do what it is
> meant to because I/O ports on ISA devices have port
> numbers above PIO_OFFSET. Also they don't have PCI.
>
> arch/mips/Kconfig: select GENERIC_IOMAP
>
> This looks completely bogus because it sets PIO_RESERVED
> to 0 and always uses the mmio part of lib/iomap.c.
>
> arch/powerpc/platforms/Kconfig: select GENERIC_IOMAP
>
> This is only used for two platforms: cell and powernv,
> though on Cell it no longer does anything after the
> commit f4981a00636 ("powerpc: Remove the celleb support");
> I think the entire io_workarounds code now be folded
> back into spider_pci.c if we wanted to.
>
> The PowerNV LPC support does seem to still rely on it.
> This tries to do the exact same thing as lib/logic_pio.c
> for Huawei arm64 servers. I suspect that neither of them
> does it entirely correctly since the powerpc side appears
> to just override any non-LPC PIO support while the arm64
> side is missing the ioread/iowrite support.
>
> Arnd
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-11-24 19:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-11-20 21:59 [PATCH 0/4] Regather scattered PCI-Code Philipp Stanner
2023-11-20 21:59 ` [PATCH 1/4] lib: move pci_iomap.c to drivers/pci/ Philipp Stanner
2023-11-21 4:20 ` kernel test robot
2023-11-21 10:44 ` Philipp Stanner
2023-11-21 6:48 ` kernel test robot
2023-11-21 7:22 ` Arnd Bergmann
2023-11-21 7:20 ` kernel test robot
2023-11-21 7:45 ` kernel test robot
2023-11-21 7:58 ` kernel test robot
2023-11-21 8:46 ` kernel test robot
2023-11-21 10:44 ` kernel test robot
2023-11-21 10:44 ` kernel test robot
2023-11-21 13:14 ` kernel test robot
2023-11-21 14:38 ` kernel test robot
2023-11-21 15:04 ` kernel test robot
2023-11-21 15:40 ` kernel test robot
2023-11-21 15:56 ` kernel test robot
2023-11-22 1:51 ` Liu, Yujie
2023-11-22 8:15 ` Philipp Stanner
2023-11-23 6:42 ` Yujie Liu
2023-11-22 16:28 ` kernel test robot
2023-11-20 21:59 ` [PATCH 2/4] lib: move pci-specific devres code " Philipp Stanner
2023-11-21 7:29 ` Arnd Bergmann
2023-11-21 8:00 ` Philipp Stanner
2023-11-21 10:10 ` Arnd Bergmann
2023-11-20 21:59 ` [PATCH 3/4] pci: move devres code from pci.c to devres.c Philipp Stanner
2023-11-21 10:17 ` Arnd Bergmann
2023-11-21 10:36 ` Philipp Stanner
2023-11-20 21:59 ` [PATCH 4/4] lib/iomap.c: improve comment about pci anomaly Philipp Stanner
2023-11-21 10:03 ` Arnd Bergmann
2023-11-21 14:38 ` Philipp Stanner
2023-11-21 14:41 ` Arnd Bergmann
2023-11-24 19:08 ` Danilo Krummrich [this message]
2023-11-29 10:16 ` Philipp Stanner
2023-11-29 17:37 ` Arnd Bergmann
2023-11-29 12:40 ` Philipp Stanner
2023-11-29 16:52 ` Arnd Bergmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a6ef92ae-0747-435b-822d-d0229da4683c@redhat.com \
--to=dakr@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arnd@kernel.org \
--cc=ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
--cc=davidgow@google.com \
--cc=eric.auger@redhat.com \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=jbaron@akamai.com \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=kent.overstreet@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=pstanner@redhat.com \
--cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
--cc=sanpeqf@gmail.com \
--cc=schnelle@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=wuqiang.matt@bytedance.com \
--cc=yury.norov@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox