From: Stefan Wahren <wahrenst@gmx.net>
To: "Florian Fainelli" <florian.fainelli@broadcom.com>,
"Ilpo Järvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>,
"Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@google.com>
Cc: Jim Quinlan <jim2101024@gmail.com>,
Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>,
linux-pci <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
kernel-list@raspberrypi.com
Subject: Re: pcie_bwctrl fails to probe on Rpi 4 (linux-next-20241101)
Date: Sat, 2 Nov 2024 21:22:35 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a98a03a2-bf62-4598-bcd4-07975271e07e@gmx.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <26c4c8fd-6afd-44fe-83a9-adebc1a281bc@broadcom.com>
Hi Florian,
Am 02.11.24 um 18:37 schrieb Florian Fainelli:
> Hi Stefan,
>
> On 11/2/2024 9:53 AM, Stefan Wahren wrote:
>> Hi,
>> I tested linux-next-20241101 with the Raspberry Pi 4 (8 GB RAM,
>> arm64/defconfig) and during boot the driver pcie_bwctrl fails to probe.
>> Since this driver is very new, I assume this never worked before:
>>
>> [ 6.843802] brcm-pcie fd500000.pcie: host bridge /scb/pcie@7d500000
>> ranges:
>> [ 6.843851] brcm-pcie fd500000.pcie: No bus range found for
>> /scb/pcie@7d500000, using [bus 00-ff]
>> [ 6.843900] brcm-pcie fd500000.pcie: MEM
>> 0x0600000000..0x0603ffffff -> 0x00f8000000
>> [ 6.843940] brcm-pcie fd500000.pcie: IB MEM
>> 0x0000000000..0x00bfffffff -> 0x0400000000
>> [ 6.859915] vchiq: module is from the staging directory, the quality
>> is unknown, you have been warned.
>> [ 6.885670] brcm-pcie fd500000.pcie: PCI host bridge to bus 0000:00
>> [ 6.885704] pci_bus 0000:00: root bus resource [bus 00-ff]
>> [ 6.885725] pci_bus 0000:00: root bus resource [mem
>> 0x600000000-0x603ffffff] (bus address [0xf8000000-0xfbffffff])
>> [ 6.885823] pci 0000:00:00.0: [14e4:2711] type 01 class 0x060400 PCIe
>> Root Port
>> [ 6.885858] pci 0000:00:00.0: PCI bridge to [bus 01]
>> [ 6.885876] pci 0000:00:00.0: bridge window [mem
>> 0x600000000-0x6000fffff]
>> [ 6.885954] pci 0000:00:00.0: PME# supported from D0 D3hot
>> [ 6.909911] pci_bus 0000:01: supply vpcie3v3 not found, using dummy
>> regulator
>> [ 6.910159] pci_bus 0000:01: supply vpcie3v3aux not found, using
>> dummy regulator
>> [ 6.910251] pci_bus 0000:01: supply vpcie12v not found, using dummy
>> regulator
>> [ 6.922254] mmc1: new high speed SDIO card at address 0001
>> [ 7.013175] brcm-pcie fd500000.pcie: clkreq-mode set to default
>> [ 7.015309] brcm-pcie fd500000.pcie: link up, 5.0 GT/s PCIe x1 (SSC)
>> [ 7.015526] pci 0000:01:00.0: [1106:3483] type 00 class 0x0c0330 PCIe
>> Endpoint
>> [ 7.015626] pci 0000:01:00.0: BAR 0 [mem 0x00000000-0x00000fff 64bit]
>> [ 7.015954] pci 0000:01:00.0: PME# supported from D0 D3hot
>> [ 7.062153] pci 0000:00:00.0: bridge window [mem
>> 0x600000000-0x6000fffff]: assigned
>> [ 7.062191] pci 0000:01:00.0: BAR 0 [mem 0x600000000-0x600000fff
>> 64bit]: assigned
>> [ 7.062221] pci 0000:00:00.0: PCI bridge to [bus 01]
>> [ 7.062237] pci 0000:00:00.0: bridge window [mem
>> 0x600000000-0x6000fffff]
>> [ 7.062255] pci_bus 0000:00: resource 4 [mem 0x600000000-0x603ffffff]
>> [ 7.062269] pci_bus 0000:01: resource 1 [mem 0x600000000-0x6000fffff]
>> [ 7.062590] pcieport 0000:00:00.0: enabling device (0000 -> 0002)
>> [ 7.062812] pcieport 0000:00:00.0: PME: Signaling with IRQ 39
>> [ 7.072890] pcieport 0000:00:00.0: AER: enabled with IRQ 39
>> [ 7.091767] v3d fec00000.gpu: [drm] Using Transparent Hugepages
>> [ 7.124274] genirq: Flags mismatch irq 39. 00002084 (PCIe bwctrl) vs.
>> 00200084 (PCIe PME)
>> [ 7.124391] pcie_bwctrl 0000:00:00.0:pcie010: probe with driver
>> pcie_bwctrl failed with error -16
>
> Yes this is a new failure for sure. So PME requests the interrupt line
> with IRQF_TRIGGER_HIGH | IRQF_SHARED | IRQF_COND_ONESHOT whereas the
> bwctrl driver does: IRQF_TRIGGER_HIGH | IRQF_SHARED | IRQF_ONESHOT.
> Reading through the comment of IRQF_COND_ONESHOT, that does not seem
> to be an incompatible configuration, but maybe it is an ordering issue
> here? That is, bwctlr should claim the interrupt line first, and then
> PME would too, and they would be OK with the flags?
sorry, i don't have any clue about PCIE and the related stuff.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-11-02 20:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-11-02 16:53 pcie_bwctrl fails to probe on Rpi 4 (linux-next-20241101) Stefan Wahren
2024-11-02 17:37 ` Florian Fainelli
2024-11-02 20:22 ` Stefan Wahren [this message]
2024-11-04 12:41 ` Ilpo Järvinen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a98a03a2-bf62-4598-bcd4-07975271e07e@gmx.net \
--to=wahrenst@gmx.net \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=florian.fainelli@broadcom.com \
--cc=ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jim2101024@gmail.com \
--cc=kernel-list@raspberrypi.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lukas@wunner.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox