From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5AAB428640E; Tue, 13 May 2025 13:39:39 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1747143580; cv=none; b=McdGFz7D1v55pQlvwuPIkCsRh3twXyNZ1fBWxjmTFC8+IjMPFGAylGu3Q2PZCc3ahafsgSiV8fhK6WmEKfC1BrMCYz3nMttPGKydyAr9f8a7119v4LYkXczGvAUpcO0mOWgHQHLuFCCJmw159aagXijxgFNY1/rLwnC02NZUV5U= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1747143580; c=relaxed/simple; bh=x4d59fbZ6X9rBfTcqBtwPRFZoK7UoseJZVn6GZygBM8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=f03D56oD6bctRgGTSkgB6K/8f1bRzbYi8y5p3Pexv8klhgConvkLWG8OjH1rA8YRtoFAzR+v18Wn+2ykj6n5FTs431iIWOG1+sfgzJUlqX1yHV3ISlflRqsNK+TBlpGEtN+dgdkhT+lkWMOu77Rd+JbLz5RCaAjnryVvuN+jrn8= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=B+jFVjqA; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="B+jFVjqA" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D13C4C4CEE4; Tue, 13 May 2025 13:39:37 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1747143579; bh=x4d59fbZ6X9rBfTcqBtwPRFZoK7UoseJZVn6GZygBM8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=B+jFVjqAP1rX82EQwPK/SLrflccRtQQkVMnGmM0VhfgHMT6K2pcbRWVFIm2AebsWL LG7tnoggsI5C4wA4P9t3mgqWw8AAQAxeAC6saO7t0TGNH+U7L8K/Wk0ktYc+/q0FVR 8ByB2oI4bs08AASWF4vN/I90pF1VrvdLFEQpJnBCLbQgN9/L5z59iZ+s1HjH6GwzZF u08UJbitIHUZKH1HwUhz8U8g609eOzYSPVzDCOrzg7rdLKMKc4KVv1VUxhcVKdBF9d o3cU5aRJ/mMktwmvaQp3Xc8m8551J53caq1kj59k0wg+KljavLmKqGi+ArFV4lI+yq oSuTCFUW9mKAw== Date: Tue, 13 May 2025 15:39:35 +0200 From: Niklas Cassel To: Krzysztof =?utf-8?Q?Wilczy=C5=84ski?= Cc: Hans Zhang <18255117159@163.com>, lpieralisi@kernel.org, bhelgaas@google.com, jingoohan1@gmail.com, manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org, robh@kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v2 0/3] Standardize link status check to return bool Message-ID: References: <20250510160710.392122-1-18255117159@163.com> <20250513102115.GA2003346@rocinante> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20250513102115.GA2003346@rocinante> Hello Krzysztof, On Tue, May 13, 2025 at 07:21:15PM +0900, Krzysztof Wilczyński wrote: > > --- > > Changes for RESEND: > > - add Reviewed-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam > > Resending a patch is not a place to add new tags. While I realize that: https://docs.kernel.org/process/submitting-patches.html#don-t-get-discouraged-or-impatient states: """ "RESEND" only applies to resubmission of a patch or patch series which have not been modified in any way from the previous submission. """ I would assume that this only refers to the commit log and code, and that picking up tags has to be an acceptable exception. If I take myself as an example, I would not be happy if I spent time reviewing a large patch series, but because the maintainers somehow missed that series, so the patch author has to RESEND it (without picking up tags), my Reviewed-by tags get lost. Kind regards, Niklas