From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from bmailout3.hostsharing.net (bmailout3.hostsharing.net [176.9.242.62]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B4F60205AA8; Thu, 15 May 2025 12:33:09 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=176.9.242.62 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1747312393; cv=none; b=DLBY9arBRHNG2pdqB8OTSGeDMT15gZtrhaGh47GBX3kowoI+q9irqF0xh+/j5nmNCJZR4sJGyp265iSIFoB9Na6dYwU9oya8IEVgMz+ob1IAy9BoldsRLcU6jgW5sS8iGS5l+WQdTZ1PpE9HPnN9gr97fkOD/uQLeLXXvpN9SAo= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1747312393; c=relaxed/simple; bh=sqn3TjNu0rqeVDckBpHQKmt76v9N8Z5F9oXbP6OA3IQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=LvGsRO1LaRFd+H4VmLexKeSxfB0b9DfQRomM3zQzOdgxtoywQ0SBjhWg67Jd4b+b3ug2TjuwBIuAzJpMQxsMwFBfYyJ575gRSeirlisn/ZJVnM987H+32vLwqBxc63RWqAGltlzJl7o3sVcXLrb5kOmqxaxxkk1GF+UVUzstEKk= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=wunner.de; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=h08.hostsharing.net; arc=none smtp.client-ip=176.9.242.62 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=wunner.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=h08.hostsharing.net Received: from h08.hostsharing.net (h08.hostsharing.net [83.223.95.28]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "*.hostsharing.net", Issuer "RapidSSL TLS RSA CA G1" (verified OK)) by bmailout3.hostsharing.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6205A2C051C8; Thu, 15 May 2025 14:32:39 +0200 (CEST) Received: by h08.hostsharing.net (Postfix, from userid 100393) id 36B082D3E7; Thu, 15 May 2025 14:33:01 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 15 May 2025 14:33:01 +0200 From: Lukas Wunner To: Ilpo =?iso-8859-1?Q?J=E4rvinen?= Cc: Krzysztof Wilczy??ski , Bjorn Helgaas , "Paul E. McKenney" , linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, LKML Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] PCI/bwctrl: Remove also pcie_bwctrl_lbms_rwsem Message-ID: References: <20250508090036.1528-1-ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com> <174724335628.23991.985637450230528945.b4-ty@kernel.org> <20250515084346.GA51912@rocinante> <98fa31e7-db86-35f0-a71c-a1ebf27f93f0@linux.intel.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <98fa31e7-db86-35f0-a71c-a1ebf27f93f0@linux.intel.com> On Thu, May 15, 2025 at 03:21:39PM +0300, Ilpo Järvinen wrote: > I'm a bit hesitant to mark "Accepted" state though, I did it this time > but in general I feel I might be overstepping my authority even if I know > some patches have been accepted. Bjorn has encouraged submitters to mark their own patches as "Superseded": "If you're really gung-ho, you can go to Patchwork [2] and mark your superseded patches as "Superseded" so I don't have to do that myself." https://lore.kernel.org/r/20171026223701.GA25649@bhelgaas-glaptop.roam.corp.google.com/ ... and I was assuming that also applies to marking one's own patches as "Accepted", but I might be jumping to the wrong conclusion. Thanks, Lukas