linux-pci.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@kernel.org>
To: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>
Cc: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	rafael@kernel.org, ojeda@kernel.org, alex.gaynor@gmail.com,
	boqun.feng@gmail.com, gary@garyguo.net, bjorn3_gh@protonmail.com,
	benno.lossin@proton.me, a.hindborg@kernel.org,
	aliceryhl@google.com, tmgross@umich.edu,
	david.m.ertman@intel.com, ira.weiny@intel.com, leon@kernel.org,
	kwilczynski@kernel.org, bhelgaas@google.com,
	rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] Device: generic accessors for drvdata + Driver::unbind()
Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2025 11:26:58 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aGuS4k4Dp1BdAP8Q@pollux> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <DB5N1F62UP4U.2XQ69N3FE1HWP@nvidia.com>

On Mon, Jul 07, 2025 at 04:18:09PM +0900, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
> On Tue Jul 1, 2025 at 7:40 PM JST, Danilo Krummrich wrote:
> >> > This makes it inefficient (but not impossible) to access device
> >> > resources, e.g. to write device registers, and impossible to call device
> >> > methods, which are only accessible under the Core device context.
> >> > 
> >> > In order to solve this, add an additional callback for (1), which we
> >> > call unbind().
> >> > 
> >> > The reason for calling it unbind() is that, unlike remove(), it is *only*
> >> > meant to be used to perform teardown operations on the device (1), but
> >> > *not* to release resources (2).
> >> 
> >> Ick.  I get the idea, but unbind() is going to get confusing fast.
> >> Determining what is, and is not, a "resource" is going to be hard over
> >> time.  In fact, how would you define it?  :)
> >
> > I think the definition is simple: All teardown operations a driver needs a
> > &Device<Core> for go into unbind().
> >
> > Whereas drop() really only is the destructor of the driver's private data.
> >
> >> Is "teardown" only allowed to write to resources, but not free them?
> >
> > "Teardown" is everything that involves interaction with the device when the
> > driver is unbound.
> >
> > However, we can't free things there, that happens in the automatically when the
> > destructor of the driver's private data is called, i.e. in drop().
> 
> Can't we somehow make a (renamed) `unbind` receive full ownership of the
> driver's private data, such that it will be freed (and its `drop`
> implementation called) before `unbind` returns? Or do we necessarily
> need to free that data later?

No, we could do that. And I thought about this as well, but I really want to
bind the lifetime of the driver's private data stored in a device to the
lifetime of this driver being bound to the device.

I don't think there is a valid use-case to allow this data as a whole to
out-live driver unbind arbitrarily.

  reply	other threads:[~2025-07-07  9:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-06-21 19:43 [PATCH 0/8] Device: generic accessors for drvdata + Driver::unbind() Danilo Krummrich
2025-06-21 19:43 ` [PATCH 1/8] rust: device: introduce device::Internal Danilo Krummrich
2025-07-01  9:26   ` Greg KH
2025-07-01 10:41     ` Danilo Krummrich
2025-07-01 12:32       ` Danilo Krummrich
2025-07-03 15:06         ` Greg KH
2025-06-21 19:43 ` [PATCH 2/8] rust: device: add drvdata accessors Danilo Krummrich
2025-07-01  9:27   ` Greg KH
2025-07-01 10:58     ` Danilo Krummrich
2025-07-01 13:12       ` Danilo Krummrich
2025-07-05 11:15   ` Benno Lossin
2025-07-05 15:06     ` Danilo Krummrich
2025-07-05 21:38       ` Benno Lossin
2025-07-07  7:46   ` Alexandre Courbot
2025-07-07  9:40     ` Danilo Krummrich
2025-06-21 19:43 ` [PATCH 3/8] rust: platform: use generic device " Danilo Krummrich
2025-06-21 19:43 ` [PATCH 4/8] rust: pci: " Danilo Krummrich
2025-07-01  9:30   ` Greg KH
2025-06-21 19:43 ` [PATCH 5/8] rust: auxiliary: " Danilo Krummrich
2025-06-21 19:43 ` [PATCH 6/8] rust: platform: implement Driver::unbind() Danilo Krummrich
2025-06-21 19:43 ` [PATCH 7/8] rust: pci: " Danilo Krummrich
2025-06-21 19:43 ` [PATCH 8/8] samples: rust: pci: reset pci-testdev in unbind() Danilo Krummrich
2025-07-01  9:25 ` [PATCH 0/8] Device: generic accessors for drvdata + Driver::unbind() Greg KH
2025-07-01 10:40   ` Danilo Krummrich
2025-07-07  7:18     ` Alexandre Courbot
2025-07-07  9:26       ` Danilo Krummrich [this message]
2025-07-08 22:25 ` Danilo Krummrich

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aGuS4k4Dp1BdAP8Q@pollux \
    --to=dakr@kernel.org \
    --cc=a.hindborg@kernel.org \
    --cc=acourbot@nvidia.com \
    --cc=alex.gaynor@gmail.com \
    --cc=aliceryhl@google.com \
    --cc=benno.lossin@proton.me \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=bjorn3_gh@protonmail.com \
    --cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
    --cc=david.m.ertman@intel.com \
    --cc=gary@garyguo.net \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=ira.weiny@intel.com \
    --cc=kwilczynski@kernel.org \
    --cc=leon@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ojeda@kernel.org \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tmgross@umich.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).