From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A810C28853E; Mon, 7 Jul 2025 11:05:46 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1751886346; cv=none; b=m9nwOJRMwsbCxcI/9qq42yfIetA44hB9JKlw6Vu9ajW2SNjqGUsA9snF8itFliG7ln9krkh7Ijyg3mdNK/qijAGddSarGvm523IRqZhLC6MnsImHPujaEYCBcdjGjsYJRV3Pk2ngo6GjLg5cC8Iqu41D6yJbpITDhihZLth+Xcs= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1751886346; c=relaxed/simple; bh=KoMwxI+BjZlkT8Tms2SDNkjYSNzeRufAe/1amGoI+ac=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=mb2DKigIYoAKWHlqYtifTYhWJKuoeE5pVr7bYdzkWf7DUH5N+lnGAkj5MV+wpQ0MaelO1tw9S6cWI9YlkKtM2cif6VrFYiAJnGnU9CwndnZQYCh/XkPZRLJia1U1xnfgHm3pAuOQdIgTj4zxP9/XvIxGyOlRtVn8ZMdIc/8Lv30= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=sDDxGoey; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="sDDxGoey" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A1431C4CEE3; Mon, 7 Jul 2025 11:05:41 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1751886346; bh=KoMwxI+BjZlkT8Tms2SDNkjYSNzeRufAe/1amGoI+ac=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=sDDxGoeyD7+j008f4C5gG8JDXIDhNP0oYiiRUsHQHw1XANM4XOzj4BtQ3WRR5Nn0K WLQ2PaBnbxIIzlNv3K7Ile06rk1m+JjXzF5UOOIs8F8KxsKtXtAULq9PJzo5d1kaxo caU444uhBlooXbSdeQvgvT8/tOrzFv03nVOss4vwcoBh01qYKDQ0/1z8HNvWeFWIXT ihr6tAvSPIwYq+TN0y7vd0jE6GXiIDMGZTlGlX4HxAe7bi6VDUGc9t5elocqno+Onm crt4dZtDXxsWvYAgX2SCmcV72FGyZzew9r+pB2iOAoJINY5GG/OgEc6ykmZmHl6wTS gBqnE5NypwKLA== Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2025 13:05:39 +0200 From: Niklas Cassel To: Manivannan Sadhasivam Cc: Bjorn Helgaas , Mahesh J Salgaonkar , Oliver O'Halloran , Bjorn Helgaas , Lorenzo Pieralisi , Krzysztof =?utf-8?Q?Wilczy=C5=84ski?= , Rob Herring , Zhou Wang , Will Deacon , Robert Richter , Alyssa Rosenzweig , Marc Zyngier , Conor Dooley , Daire McNamara , dingwei@marvell.com, Lukas Wunner , Krishna Chaitanya Chundru , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 4/5] PCI: host-common: Add link down handling for host bridges Message-ID: References: <20250530113404.GA138859@bhelgaas> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Hello Mani, On Fri, May 30, 2025 at 09:39:28PM +0530, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote: > On Fri, May 30, 2025 at 06:34:04AM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > > > I think pci_host_handle_link_down() should take a Root Port, not a > > host bridge, and the controller driver should figure out which port > > needs to be recovered, or the controller driver can have its own loop > > to recover all of them if it can't figure out which one needs it. > > > > This should also work. Feel free to drop the relevant commits for v6.16, I can > resubmit them (including dw-rockchip after -rc1). What is the current status of this? I assume that there is not much time left before 6.17 cut-off. Kind regards, Niklas