linux-pci.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Cc: <robin.murphy@arm.com>, <joro@8bytes.org>, <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	<will@kernel.org>, <robin.clark@oss.qualcomm.com>,
	<yong.wu@mediatek.com>, <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
	<angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>,
	<thierry.reding@gmail.com>, <vdumpa@nvidia.com>,
	<jonathanh@nvidia.com>, <rafael@kernel.org>, <lenb@kernel.org>,
	<kevin.tian@intel.com>, <yi.l.liu@intel.com>,
	<baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>, <iommu@lists.linux.dev>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org>,
	<linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>, <patches@lists.linux.dev>,
	<pjaroszynski@nvidia.com>, <vsethi@nvidia.com>,
	<helgaas@kernel.org>, <etzhao1900@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/5] iommu: Add iommu_get_domain_for_dev_locked() helper
Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2025 10:22:20 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aKSyzI9Xz3J0nhfk@Asurada-Nvidia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250819125249.GG802098@nvidia.com>

On Tue, Aug 19, 2025 at 09:52:49AM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 18, 2025 at 10:09:11PM -0700, Nicolin Chen wrote:
> > Yes, I've thought about that. The concern is that some other place
> > someday may want to use iommu_get_domain_for_dev() in similar cases
> > but would find that it doesn't work. So it would have to duplicate
> > the domain pointer in its "master" structure.
> > 
> > Overall, having a _locked version feels cleaner to me.
> 
> We probably need the locked version, but it just shouldn't be called very
> much..

OK. Let's have one patch upgrading the attach_dev to pass in the
old domain pointer (aligning with the SVA version of attach_dev),
and another patch adding the _locked version that then will have
very limited callers.

> > > With sensible internal locking
> > 
> > Hmm, I feel this iommu_get_translation_mode() is somewhat the same
> > as the current iommu_get_domain_for_dev(). It would just return the
> > group->domain->type v.s. group->domain, right?
> > 
> > This doesn't have any UAF concern though.
> 
> Yes, no UAF concern is the point

I see.

> > > So that is another bunch. Not sure what will be left after.
> > 
> > I recall that some of the drivers manages their own domains, e.g.
> >     drivers/gpu/drm/tegra/drm.c
> > 
> > So, they would want more out of the domain pointer than just type.
> 
> This looks like it wants an 'is currently attached' operation

That's certainly one of the wide use cases. And I think we could
have an IOMMU_DOMAIN_NONE to fit that into the type helper.

Yet, I also see some other cases that cannot be helped with the
type function. Just listing a few:

1) domain matching (and type)
drivers/gpu/drm/tegra/drm.c:965:        if (domain && domain->type != IOMMU_DOMAIN_IDENTITY &&
drivers/gpu/drm/tegra/drm.c:966:            domain != tegra->domain)
drivers/gpu/drm/tegra/drm.c-967-                return 0;

2) page size
drivers/gpu/drm/arm/malidp_planes.c:307:	mmu_dom = iommu_get_domain_for_dev(mp->base.dev->dev);
drivers/gpu/drm/arm/malidp_planes.c-308-	if (mmu_dom)
drivers/gpu/drm/arm/malidp_planes.c-309-		return mmu_dom->pgsize_bitmap;

3) iommu_iova_to_phys
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.c:2597:	dom = iommu_get_domain_for_dev(adev->dev);
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.c-2598-
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.c-2599-	while (size) {
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.c-2600-		phys_addr_t addr = *pos & PAGE_MASK;
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.c-2601-		loff_t off = *pos & ~PAGE_MASK;
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.c-2602-		size_t bytes = PAGE_SIZE - off;
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.c-2603-		unsigned long pfn;
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.c-2604-		struct page *p;
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.c-2605-		void *ptr;
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.c-2606-
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.c-2607-		bytes = min(bytes, size);
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.c-2608-
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.c:2609:		addr = dom ? iommu_iova_to_phys(dom, addr) : addr;

4) map/unmap
drivers/net/ipa/ipa_mem.c:465:  domain = iommu_get_domain_for_dev(dev);
drivers/net/ipa/ipa_mem.c-466-  if (!domain) {
drivers/net/ipa/ipa_mem.c-467-          dev_err(dev, "no IOMMU domain found for IMEM\n");
drivers/net/ipa/ipa_mem.c-468-          return -EINVAL;
drivers/net/ipa/ipa_mem.c-469-  }
drivers/net/ipa/ipa_mem.c-470-
drivers/net/ipa/ipa_mem.c-471-  /* Align the address down and the size up to page boundaries */
drivers/net/ipa/ipa_mem.c-472-  phys = addr & PAGE_MASK;
drivers/net/ipa/ipa_mem.c-473-  size = PAGE_ALIGN(size + addr - phys);
drivers/net/ipa/ipa_mem.c-474-  iova = phys;    /* We just want a direct mapping */
drivers/net/ipa/ipa_mem.c-475-
drivers/net/ipa/ipa_mem.c-476-  ret = iommu_map(domain, iova, phys, size, IOMMU_READ | IOMMU_WRITE,
...
drivers/net/ipa/ipa_mem.c:495:  domain = iommu_get_domain_for_dev(dev);
drivers/net/ipa/ipa_mem.c-496-  if (domain) {
drivers/net/ipa/ipa_mem.c-497-          size_t size;
drivers/net/ipa/ipa_mem.c-498-
drivers/net/ipa/ipa_mem.c-499-          size = iommu_unmap(domain, ipa->imem_iova, ipa->imem_size);


We could probably invent something for case 1-3. But for case 4,
it feels that iommu_get_domain_for_dev() is the only helper..

Thanks
Nicolin

  reply	other threads:[~2025-08-19 17:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-08-11 22:59 [PATCH v3 0/5] Disable ATS via iommu during PCI resets Nicolin Chen
2025-08-11 22:59 ` [PATCH v3 1/5] iommu: Lock group->mutex in iommu_deferred_attach Nicolin Chen
2025-08-15  5:09   ` Baolu Lu
2025-08-15  8:27     ` Tian, Kevin
2025-08-15  8:24   ` Tian, Kevin
2025-08-15 19:26     ` Nicolin Chen
2025-08-18 14:17     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-08-18 17:45       ` Nicolin Chen
2025-08-18 18:09         ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-08-18 18:29           ` Nicolin Chen
2025-08-11 22:59 ` [PATCH v3 2/5] iommu: Pass in gdev to __iommu_device_set_domain Nicolin Chen
2025-08-15  5:18   ` Baolu Lu
2025-08-15  8:29   ` Tian, Kevin
2025-08-11 22:59 ` [PATCH v3 3/5] iommu: Add iommu_get_domain_for_dev_locked() helper Nicolin Chen
2025-08-15  5:28   ` Baolu Lu
2025-08-15 18:48     ` Nicolin Chen
2025-08-18 14:40     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-08-19  2:09       ` Baolu Lu
2025-08-15  8:55   ` Tian, Kevin
2025-08-15 18:45     ` Nicolin Chen
2025-08-21  8:07       ` Tian, Kevin
2025-08-21 14:41         ` Nicolin Chen
2025-08-31 23:24           ` Nicolin Chen
2025-08-18 14:39   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-08-18 17:22     ` Nicolin Chen
2025-08-18 23:42       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-08-19  5:09         ` Nicolin Chen
2025-08-19 12:52           ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-08-19 17:22             ` Nicolin Chen [this message]
2025-08-21 13:13               ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-08-21 15:22                 ` Nicolin Chen
2025-08-21 18:37                   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-08-22  5:11                     ` Nicolin Chen
2025-08-21  8:11       ` Tian, Kevin
2025-08-21 13:14         ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-08-22  9:45           ` Tian, Kevin
2025-08-22 13:21             ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-08-11 22:59 ` [PATCH v3 4/5] iommu: Introduce iommu_dev_reset_prepare() and iommu_dev_reset_done() Nicolin Chen
2025-08-15  5:49   ` Baolu Lu
2025-08-15 20:10     ` Nicolin Chen
2025-08-15  9:14   ` Tian, Kevin
2025-08-15 19:45     ` Nicolin Chen
2025-08-11 22:59 ` [PATCH v3 5/5] pci: Suspend iommu function prior to resetting a device Nicolin Chen
2025-08-19 14:12   ` Ethan Zhao
2025-08-19 21:59     ` Nicolin Chen
2025-08-20  3:18       ` Ethan Zhao
2025-08-22  6:14         ` Nicolin Chen
2025-08-21 13:07       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-08-22  6:35         ` Nicolin Chen
2025-08-22 14:08           ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-08-22 18:50             ` Nicolin Chen
2025-08-28 12:51               ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-08-28 15:08                 ` Nicolin Chen
2025-08-28 18:46                   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-08-28 19:35                     ` Nicolin Chen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aKSyzI9Xz3J0nhfk@Asurada-Nvidia \
    --to=nicolinc@nvidia.com \
    --cc=angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com \
    --cc=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=etzhao1900@gmail.com \
    --cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
    --cc=jonathanh@nvidia.com \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
    --cc=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
    --cc=patches@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=pjaroszynski@nvidia.com \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=robin.clark@oss.qualcomm.com \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
    --cc=vdumpa@nvidia.com \
    --cc=vsethi@nvidia.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=yi.l.liu@intel.com \
    --cc=yong.wu@mediatek.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).