From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AE75C1FCCF8; Fri, 12 Sep 2025 16:56:12 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1757696172; cv=none; b=rDIDQHQR5bnAb/vH9XImMdAdBozFbvcV+2VVXjHbNvrUb5YpmoMUjUQ3Db6fWkoOGhmwprTw7c7nJHlNShSto9jL0YU9fPZMVaUrRZXodu8pwpuFVquVzl4DMfxlCBJz2HYb25jKmbrM9bHvrn7iv0rVPmkOpsksGftzDwbnawk= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1757696172; c=relaxed/simple; bh=lCl0XQHwbM5pI8x6nDZ7HvUoRHtAmwNonsL9f/l04Nc=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=XGwOulk4pYgdi9Ps1yq/WtTH/bxjOcCTJXBsM/n7RY6AGIN/j12kp4Cy0Y63kPblLLbMqrqFu0wNYwV17gM9dzf8EcSx2R/5Wqi3YeY6Fb29qTZWr158LDNESrU+XAEwQzip93UB/5Au+P9ubLIcVamc3xDjnRIZ2Ib40S2QPGo= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=ivJVpJTY; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="ivJVpJTY" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4EACAC4CEF1; Fri, 12 Sep 2025 16:56:11 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1757696172; bh=lCl0XQHwbM5pI8x6nDZ7HvUoRHtAmwNonsL9f/l04Nc=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=ivJVpJTYZb6FGFKKUQDcDV981FMKlNM1jwYODBbKEZVTiwCF1DAhbhxmdHub3wXSk +Cn1F8485hkJzCnpoYnpb/igk2JdT4NZZLvrK3eHqqHU/da38S2DoaW8ySt/xXa61P 9w6sfkUpbjNwhZt8XyEUOpubnWbKf1RGDgG+O9eTubABaZlDwXeSQU14WlrrlUcLwa Kk9N77I3CJBsnMqVl4+uuNtG/fJ1CgFHDAL3X6O+1fnFf+vTR5G63X7DV2GNhOMkWQ 6gEvLWZsb+EKxpIh07pEoWkmXbNqh+sJJIRtsuh6pxJkHeWk1R7HJZFxUqBRGnF4PI YqziXLVENNZJA== Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2025 12:56:09 -0400 From: Keith Busch To: Matthew Wood Cc: Bjorn Helgaas , Mario Limonciello , Jonathan Cameron , Thomas =?iso-8859-1?Q?Wei=DFschuh?= , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v7 1/1] PCI/sysfs: Expose PCIe device serial number Message-ID: References: <20250821232239.599523-1-thepacketgeek@gmail.com> <20250821232239.599523-2-thepacketgeek@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Wed, Aug 27, 2025 at 01:39:41PM -0600, Keith Busch wrote: > Can we get a ruling on this one? It's pretty straight forward > implementation exposing a useful attribute. This patch has got a good > amount of reviews and tests. Any objections? I guess silence means acceptance. Unless I hear otherwise, I'll queue this up in my tree to be sent out for the next merge window.