linux-pci.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>
To: Petr Pavlu <petr.pavlu@suse.com>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>,
	Daniel Gomez <da.gomez@kernel.org>,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, David Gow <davidgow@google.com>,
	Rae Moar <rmoar@google.com>,
	linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-modules@vger.kernel.org,
	Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>,
	Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@google.com>,
	Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>, Wei Liu <wei.liu@kernel.org>,
	Brendan Higgins <brendan.higgins@linux.dev>,
	kunit-dev@googlegroups.com,
	Anton Ivanov <anton.ivanov@cambridgegreys.com>,
	linux-um@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] PCI: Support FIXUP quirks in modules
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2025 10:42:14 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aNLb9g0AbBXZCJ4m@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c84d6952-7977-47cd-8f09-6ea223217337@suse.com>

Hi Petr,

On Tue, Sep 23, 2025 at 02:55:34PM +0200, Petr Pavlu wrote:
> On 9/13/25 12:59 AM, Brian Norris wrote:
> > @@ -259,6 +315,12 @@ void pci_fixup_device(enum pci_fixup_pass pass, struct pci_dev *dev)
> >  		return;
> >  	}
> >  	pci_do_fixups(dev, start, end);
> > +
> > +	struct pci_fixup_arg arg = {
> > +		.dev = dev,
> > +		.pass = pass,
> > +	};
> > +	module_for_each_mod(pci_module_fixup, &arg);
> 
> The function module_for_each_mod() walks not only modules that are LIVE,
> but also those in the COMING and GOING states. This means that this code
> can potentially execute a PCI fixup from a module before its init
> function is invoked, and similarly, a fixup can be executed after the
> exit function has already run. Is this intentional?

Thanks for the callout. I didn't really give this part much thought
previously.

Per the comments, COMING means "Full formed, running module_init". I
believe that is a good thing, actually; specifically for controller
drivers, module_init() might be probing the controller and enumerating
child PCI devices to which we should apply these FIXUPs. That is a key
case to support.

GOING is not clearly defined in the header comments, but it seems like
it's a relatively narrow window between determining there are no module
refcounts (and transition to GOING) and starting to really tear it down
(transitioning to UNFORMED before any significant teardown).
module_exit() runs in the GOING phase.

I think it does not make sense to execute FIXUPs on a GOING module; I'll
make that change.

Re-quoting one piece:
> This means that this code
> can potentially execute a PCI fixup from a module before its init
> function is invoked,

IIUC, this part is not true? A module is put into COMING state before
its init function is invoked.


> > --- a/kernel/module/main.c
> > +++ b/kernel/module/main.c
> > @@ -2702,6 +2702,32 @@ static int find_module_sections(struct module *mod, struct load_info *info)
> >  					      sizeof(*mod->kunit_init_suites),
> >  					      &mod->num_kunit_init_suites);
> >  #endif
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_PCI_QUIRKS
> > +	mod->pci_fixup_early = section_objs(info, ".pci_fixup_early",
> > +					    sizeof(*mod->pci_fixup_early),
> > +					    &mod->pci_fixup_early_size);
> > +	mod->pci_fixup_header = section_objs(info, ".pci_fixup_header",
> > +					     sizeof(*mod->pci_fixup_header),
> > +					     &mod->pci_fixup_header_size);
> > +	mod->pci_fixup_final = section_objs(info, ".pci_fixup_final",
> > +					    sizeof(*mod->pci_fixup_final),
> > +					    &mod->pci_fixup_final_size);
> > +	mod->pci_fixup_enable = section_objs(info, ".pci_fixup_enable",
> > +					     sizeof(*mod->pci_fixup_enable),
> > +					     &mod->pci_fixup_enable_size);
> > +	mod->pci_fixup_resume = section_objs(info, ".pci_fixup_resume",
> > +					     sizeof(*mod->pci_fixup_resume),
> > +					     &mod->pci_fixup_resume_size);
> > +	mod->pci_fixup_suspend = section_objs(info, ".pci_fixup_suspend",
> > +					      sizeof(*mod->pci_fixup_suspend),
> > +					      &mod->pci_fixup_suspend_size);
> > +	mod->pci_fixup_resume_early = section_objs(info, ".pci_fixup_resume_early",
> > +						   sizeof(*mod->pci_fixup_resume_early),
> > +						   &mod->pci_fixup_resume_early_size);
> > +	mod->pci_fixup_suspend_late = section_objs(info, ".pci_fixup_suspend_late",
> > +						   sizeof(*mod->pci_fixup_suspend_late),
> > +						   &mod->pci_fixup_suspend_late_size);
> > +#endif
> >  
> >  	mod->extable = section_objs(info, "__ex_table",
> >  				    sizeof(*mod->extable), &mod->num_exentries);
> 
> Nit: I suggest writing the object_size argument passed to section_objs()
> here directly as "1" instead of using sizeof(*mod->pci_fixup_...) =
> sizeof(void). This makes the style consistent with the other code in
> find_module_sections().

Ack.

Thanks,
Brian

  reply	other threads:[~2025-09-23 17:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-09-12 22:59 [PATCH 0/4] PCI: Add support and tests for FIXUP quirks in modules Brian Norris
2025-09-12 22:59 ` [PATCH 1/4] PCI: Support " Brian Norris
2025-09-15  6:33   ` Johannes Berg
2025-09-15 18:34     ` Brian Norris
2025-09-23 12:55   ` Petr Pavlu
2025-09-23 17:42     ` Brian Norris [this message]
2025-09-24  7:48       ` Petr Pavlu
2025-10-06 22:58         ` Brian Norris
2025-10-20 11:53           ` Petr Pavlu
2025-09-12 22:59 ` [PATCH 2/4] PCI: Add KUnit tests for FIXUP quirks Brian Norris
2025-09-15  8:06   ` Tzung-Bi Shih
2025-09-15 20:25     ` Brian Norris
2025-09-12 22:59 ` [PATCH 3/4] um: Select PCI_DOMAINS_GENERIC Brian Norris
2025-09-12 22:59 ` [PATCH 4/4] kunit: qemu_configs: Add PCI to arm, arm64 Brian Norris
2025-09-15 13:48 ` [PATCH 0/4] PCI: Add support and tests for FIXUP quirks in modules Christoph Hellwig
2025-09-15 18:41   ` Brian Norris
2025-09-22 18:13     ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-09-22 18:48       ` Brian Norris
2025-09-29  8:56         ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-09-23 16:20       ` Manivannan Sadhasivam

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aNLb9g0AbBXZCJ4m@google.com \
    --to=briannorris@chromium.org \
    --cc=anton.ivanov@cambridgegreys.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=brendan.higgins@linux.dev \
    --cc=da.gomez@kernel.org \
    --cc=davidgow@google.com \
    --cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
    --cc=kunit-dev@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-modules@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-um@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=mcgrof@kernel.org \
    --cc=petr.pavlu@suse.com \
    --cc=richard@nod.at \
    --cc=rmoar@google.com \
    --cc=samitolvanen@google.com \
    --cc=wei.liu@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).