linux-pci.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>
To: Farhan Ali <alifm@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Benjamin Block <bblock@linux.ibm.com>,
	linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
	alex.williamson@redhat.com, helgaas@kernel.org, clg@redhat.com,
	schnelle@linux.ibm.com, mjrosato@linux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 01/10] PCI: Avoid saving error values for config space
Date: Sat, 4 Oct 2025 16:54:28 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aOE1JMryY_Oa663e@wunner.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ae5b191d-ffc6-4d40-a44b-d08e04cac6be@linux.ibm.com>

On Wed, Oct 01, 2025 at 10:12:03AM -0700, Farhan Ali wrote:
> AFAIU if the state_saved flag was set to true then any state that we have
> saved should be valid and should be okay to be restored from. We just want
> to avoid saving any invalid data.

The state_saved flag is used by the PCI core to detect whether a driver
has called pci_save_state() in one of its suspend callbacks.  If it did,
the PCI core assumes that the driver has taken on the responsibility to
put the device into a low power state.  The PCI core will thus not put
the device into a low power state itself and it won't (again) call
pci_save_state().

Hence state_saved is cleared before the driver suspend callbacks are
invoked and it is checked afterwards.

Clearing the state_saved flag in pci_restore_state() merely serves the
purpose of ensuring that the flag is cleared ahead of the next suspend
and resume cycle.

It is a fallacy to think that state_saved indicates validity of the
saved state.

Unfortunately pci_restore_state() was amended by c82f63e411f1 to
bail out if state_saved is false.  This has arguably caused more
problems than it solved, so I have prepared this development branch
which essentially reverts the commit and undoes most of the awful
workarounds that it necessitated:

https://github.com/l1k/linux/commits/aer_reset_v1

I intend to submit this after the merge window has closed.

The motivation of c82f63e411f1 was to prevent restoring state if
pci_save_state() hasn't been called before.  I am solving that by
calling pci_save_state() on device addition, hence error
recoverability is ensured at all times.

I believe this also makes patch [01/10] in your series unnecessary.

A lot of drivers call pci_save_state() in their probe hook and
that continues to be correct if they modified Config Space
vis-a-vis what was saved on device addition.

Thanks,

Lukas

  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-10-04 14:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-09-24 17:16 [PATCH v4 00/10] Error recovery for vfio-pci devices on s390x Farhan Ali
2025-09-24 17:16 ` [PATCH v4 01/10] PCI: Avoid saving error values for config space Farhan Ali
2025-10-01 15:15   ` Benjamin Block
2025-10-01 17:12     ` Farhan Ali
2025-10-02  9:16       ` Benjamin Block
2025-10-04 14:54       ` Lukas Wunner [this message]
2025-10-06 17:54         ` Farhan Ali
2025-10-06 19:26           ` Lukas Wunner
2025-10-06 21:35             ` Farhan Ali
2025-10-08 13:34               ` Lukas Wunner
2025-10-08 17:56                 ` Farhan Ali
2025-10-08 18:14                   ` Lukas Wunner
2025-10-08 21:55                     ` Farhan Ali
2025-10-09  4:52                       ` Lukas Wunner
2025-10-09 17:02                         ` Farhan Ali
2025-10-12  6:43                           ` Lukas Wunner
2025-10-09  9:12                     ` Niklas Schnelle
2025-10-12  6:34                       ` Lukas Wunner
2025-10-14 12:07                         ` Niklas Schnelle
2025-10-16 21:00                           ` Farhan Ali
2025-10-19 14:34                           ` Lukas Wunner
2025-10-20  8:59                             ` Niklas Schnelle
2025-11-22 10:58                               ` Lukas Wunner
2025-09-24 17:16 ` [PATCH v4 02/10] PCI: Add additional checks for flr reset Farhan Ali
2025-09-30 10:03   ` Benjamin Block
2025-09-30 17:04     ` Farhan Ali
2025-10-01  8:33       ` Benjamin Block
2025-10-01 14:37   ` Benjamin Block
2025-09-24 17:16 ` [PATCH v4 03/10] PCI: Allow per function PCI slots Farhan Ali
2025-10-01 14:34   ` Benjamin Block
2025-09-24 17:16 ` [PATCH v4 04/10] s390/pci: Add architecture specific resource/bus address translation Farhan Ali
2025-09-25 10:54   ` Niklas Schnelle
2025-10-01 16:04     ` Benjamin Block
2025-10-01 18:01       ` Farhan Ali
2025-10-02 12:58   ` Niklas Schnelle
2025-10-02 17:00     ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-10-02 17:16       ` Ilpo Järvinen
2025-10-02 18:14       ` Niklas Schnelle
2025-09-24 17:16 ` [PATCH v4 05/10] s390/pci: Restore IRQ unconditionally for the zPCI device Farhan Ali
2025-09-24 17:16 ` [PATCH v4 06/10] s390/pci: Update the logic for detecting passthrough device Farhan Ali
2025-09-24 17:16 ` [PATCH v4 07/10] s390/pci: Store PCI error information for passthrough devices Farhan Ali
2025-09-25 14:28   ` Niklas Schnelle
2025-09-25 16:29     ` Farhan Ali
2025-09-24 17:16 ` [PATCH v4 08/10] vfio-pci/zdev: Add a device feature for error information Farhan Ali
2025-09-25  8:04   ` kernel test robot
2025-09-24 17:16 ` [PATCH v4 09/10] vfio: Add a reset_done callback for vfio-pci driver Farhan Ali
2025-09-24 17:16 ` [PATCH v4 10/10] vfio: Remove the pcie check for VFIO_PCI_ERR_IRQ_INDEX Farhan Ali

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aOE1JMryY_Oa663e@wunner.de \
    --to=lukas@wunner.de \
    --cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
    --cc=alifm@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=bblock@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=clg@redhat.com \
    --cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mjrosato@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=schnelle@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).