From: Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI/PM: Prevent runtime suspend before devices are fully initialized
Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2025 10:11:01 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aPJ4pZFENCTx9yhy@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJZ5v0iFa3_UFkA920Ogn0YAYLq4CjnAD_VjLsmxQxrfm5HEBw@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Rafael,
On Fri, Oct 17, 2025 at 11:45:14AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 17, 2025 at 1:28 AM Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org> wrote:
> >
> > PCI devices are created via pci_scan_slot() and similar, and are
> > promptly configured for runtime PM (pci_pm_init()). They are initially
> > prevented from suspending by way of pm_runtime_forbid(); however, it's
> > expected that user space may override this via sysfs [1].
> >
> > Now, sometime after initial scan, a PCI device receives its BAR
> > configuration (pci_assign_unassigned_bus_resources(), etc.).
> >
> > If a PCI device is allowed to suspend between pci_scan_slot() and
> > pci_assign_unassigned_bus_resources(), then pci-driver.c will
> > save/restore incorrect BAR configuration for the device, and the device
> > may cease to function.
> >
> > This behavior races with user space, since user space may enable runtime
> > PM [1] as soon as it sees the device, which may be before BAR
> > configuration.
> >
> > Prevent suspending in this intermediate state by holding a runtime PM
> > reference until the device is fully initialized and ready for probe().
> >
> > [1] echo auto > /sys/bus/pci/devices/.../power/control
> >
> > Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>
> > ---
> >
> > drivers/pci/bus.c | 7 +++++++
> > drivers/pci/pci.c | 6 ++++++
> > 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/pci/bus.c b/drivers/pci/bus.c
> > index f26aec6ff588..227a8898acac 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pci/bus.c
> > +++ b/drivers/pci/bus.c
> > @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
> > #include <linux/of.h>
> > #include <linux/of_platform.h>
> > #include <linux/platform_device.h>
> > +#include <linux/pm_runtime.h>
> > #include <linux/proc_fs.h>
> > #include <linux/slab.h>
> >
> > @@ -375,6 +376,12 @@ void pci_bus_add_device(struct pci_dev *dev)
> > put_device(&pdev->dev);
> > }
> >
> > + /*
> > + * Now that resources are assigned, drop the reference we grabbed in
> > + * pci_pm_init().
> > + */
> > + pm_runtime_put_noidle(&dev->dev);
> > +
> > if (!dn || of_device_is_available(dn))
> > pci_dev_allow_binding(dev);
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci.c b/drivers/pci/pci.c
> > index b14dd064006c..06a901214f2c 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pci/pci.c
> > +++ b/drivers/pci/pci.c
> > @@ -3226,6 +3226,12 @@ void pci_pm_init(struct pci_dev *dev)
> > pci_pm_power_up_and_verify_state(dev);
> > pm_runtime_forbid(&dev->dev);
> > pm_runtime_set_active(&dev->dev);
> > + /*
> > + * We cannot allow a device to suspend before its resources are
> > + * configured. Otherwise, we may allow saving/restoring unexpected BAR
> > + * configuration.
> > + */
> > + pm_runtime_get_noresume(&dev->dev);
> > pm_runtime_enable(&dev->dev);
>
> So runtime PM should not be enabled here, should it?
Hmm, I suppose not. Does that imply it would be a better solution to
simply defer pm_runtime_enable() to pci_bus_add_device() or some similar
point? I'll give that a shot, since that seems like a simpler and
cleaner solution.
Thanks,
Brian
> > }
> >
> > --
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-17 17:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-16 22:53 [PATCH] PCI/PM: Prevent runtime suspend before devices are fully initialized Brian Norris
2025-10-17 8:32 ` Lukas Wunner
2025-10-17 11:49 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2025-10-17 17:43 ` Brian Norris
2025-10-17 19:20 ` Brian Norris
2025-10-20 15:56 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2025-10-20 18:52 ` Brian Norris
2025-10-21 11:27 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2025-10-21 12:53 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-10-21 13:18 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2025-10-21 18:27 ` Brian Norris
2025-10-21 18:56 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-10-21 18:13 ` Brian Norris
2025-10-22 13:38 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2025-10-17 9:45 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-10-17 17:11 ` Brian Norris [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aPJ4pZFENCTx9yhy@google.com \
--to=briannorris@chromium.org \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lukas@wunner.de \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).