From: Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>
To: "Ilpo Järvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI/PM: Prevent runtime suspend before devices are fully initialized
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2025 11:27:39 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aPfQmy0-7Cd0I9Jp@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <41d5c358-e469-3757-8bfb-e88c3d187e02@linux.intel.com>
On Tue, Oct 21, 2025 at 04:18:54PM +0300, Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Oct 2025, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > So the purpose of this "forbid" call in pci_pm_init() is to "block"
> > runtime PM for PCI devices by default, but allow user space to
> > "unblock" it later.
> >
> > Would adding a comment to that effect next to that call be useful?
>
> It would be useful to improve the wording in PM documentation which is too
> ambiguous. I suggest changing this:
>
> "void pm_runtime_forbid(struct device *dev);
>
> unset the power.runtime_auto flag for the device and increase its
> usage counter (used by the /sys/devices/.../power/control interface to
> effectively prevent the device from being power managed at run time).
>
> to:
>
> "... (used to prevent the device from being power managed at run time
> until pm_runtime_allow() or /sys/devices/.../power/control interface
> allows it)."
Looks like a good change to me, even if just scratching the surface. If
this goes in a patch, you can add my:
Reviewed-by: Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>
A separate problem that sorta stopped me from trying to rewrite some of
the Documentation/ is that we have both
Documentation/power/runtime_pm.rst and kerneldoc in
include/linux/pm_runtime.h + drivers/base/power/runtime.c. It doesn't
feel great having separate variations of the same API docs.
But hey, I shouldn't let "perfect" be the enemy of progress.
Brian
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-21 18:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-16 22:53 [PATCH] PCI/PM: Prevent runtime suspend before devices are fully initialized Brian Norris
2025-10-17 8:32 ` Lukas Wunner
2025-10-17 11:49 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2025-10-17 17:43 ` Brian Norris
2025-10-17 19:20 ` Brian Norris
2025-10-20 15:56 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2025-10-20 18:52 ` Brian Norris
2025-10-21 11:27 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2025-10-21 12:53 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-10-21 13:18 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2025-10-21 18:27 ` Brian Norris [this message]
2025-10-21 18:56 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-10-21 18:13 ` Brian Norris
2025-10-22 13:38 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2025-10-17 9:45 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-10-17 17:11 ` Brian Norris
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aPfQmy0-7Cd0I9Jp@google.com \
--to=briannorris@chromium.org \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lukas@wunner.de \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).