linux-pci.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Geraldo Nascimento <geraldogabriel@gmail.com>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org,
	"Shawn Lin" <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com>,
	"Lorenzo Pieralisi" <lpieralisi@kernel.org>,
	"Krzysztof Wilczyński" <kwilczynski@kernel.org>,
	"Manivannan Sadhasivam" <mani@kernel.org>,
	"Rob Herring" <robh@kernel.org>,
	"Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	"Heiko Stuebner" <heiko@sntech.de>,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	"Krzysztof Kozlowski" <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
	"Conor Dooley" <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
	"Johan Jonker" <jbx6244@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/2] PCI: rockchip-host: drop wait on PERST# toggle
Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2025 00:55:32 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aQrKtFT0ldc70gKj@geday> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251103181038.GA1814635@bhelgaas>

On Mon, Nov 03, 2025 at 12:10:38PM -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 03, 2025 at 03:27:25AM -0300, Geraldo Nascimento wrote:
> > With this change PCIe will complete link-training with a known quirky
> > device - Samsung OEM PM981a SSD. This is completely against the PCIe
> > spec and yet it works as long as the power regulator for 3v3 PCIe
> > power is not defined as always-on or boot-on.
> 
> What is against the spec?  In what way is this SSD "known quirky"?  Is
> there a published erratum for it?
> 
> Removing this delay might make this SSD work, but if this delay is
> required per PCIe spec, how can we be confident that other devices
> will still work?
> 
> Reports of devices that still work is not really enough to move this
> from the "hack that makes one device work" column to the "safe and
> effective for all devices" column.
> 
> It's easy to see how *lack* of a delay can break something, but much
> harder to imagine how *removing* a delay can make something work.
> Devices must be able to tolerate pretty much arbitrary delays.

Hi Bjorn!

I did some more testing, intrigued by why would a delay of more than
5 ms after the enablement of the power rails trigger failure in
initial link-training.

Something in my intuition kept telling me this was PERST# related,
and so I followed that rabbit-hole.

It seems the following change will allow the SSD to work with the
Rockchip-IP PCIe core without any other changes. So it is purely
a DT change and we are able to keep the mandatory 100ms delay
after driving PERST# low, as well as the always-on/boot-on
properties of the 3v3 power regulator.

This time everything is within the PCIe spec AFAICT, PERST# indeed
is an Open Drain signal, and indeed it does requires pull-up resistor
to maintain the drive after driving it high.

I'm still testing the overall stability of this, let's hope for the
best!

Thanks,
Geraldo Nascimento

diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399pro-vmarc-som.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399pro-vmarc-som.dtsi
index aa70776e898a..1c5afc0413bc 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399pro-vmarc-som.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399pro-vmarc-som.dtsi
@@ -383,13 +383,14 @@ &pcie_phy {
 };
 
 &pcie0 {
-	ep-gpios = <&gpio0 RK_PB4 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
+	ep-gpios = <&gpio0 RK_PB4 (GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH | GPIO_OPEN_DRAIN)>;
 	num-lanes = <4>;
-	pinctrl-0 = <&pcie_clkreqnb_cpm>;
+	pinctrl-0 = <&pcie_clkreqnb_cpm>, <&pcie_perst>;
 	pinctrl-names = "default";
 	vpcie0v9-supply = <&vcca_0v9>;	/* VCC_0V9_S0 */
 	vpcie1v8-supply = <&vcca_1v8>;	/* VCC_1V8_S0 */
 	vpcie3v3-supply = <&vcc3v3_pcie>;
+	max-link-speed = <2>;
 	status = "okay";
 };
 
@@ -408,6 +409,10 @@ pcie {
 		pcie_pwr: pcie-pwr {
 			rockchip,pins = <4 RK_PD4 RK_FUNC_GPIO &pcfg_pull_up>;
 		};
+		pcie_perst: pcie-perst {
+			rockchip,pins = <0 RK_PB4 RK_FUNC_GPIO &pcfg_pull_up>;
+		};
+
 	};
 
 	pmic {

  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-11-05  3:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-11-03  6:26 [RFC PATCH 0/2] PCI: rockchip-host: support quirky devices Geraldo Nascimento
2025-11-03  6:27 ` [RFC PATCH 1/2] arm64: dts: rockchip: drop PCIe 3v3 always-on/boot-on Geraldo Nascimento
2025-11-03  6:27 ` [RFC PATCH 2/2] PCI: rockchip-host: drop wait on PERST# toggle Geraldo Nascimento
2025-11-03 18:10   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-11-03 20:55     ` Geraldo Nascimento
2025-11-05  3:55     ` Geraldo Nascimento [this message]
2025-11-05  9:06       ` Diederik de Haas
2025-11-05 21:22         ` Geraldo Nascimento
2025-11-07 10:27           ` Diederik de Haas
2025-11-09 23:51       ` Dragan Simic
2025-11-09 23:57         ` Geraldo Nascimento

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aQrKtFT0ldc70gKj@geday \
    --to=geraldogabriel@gmail.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=heiko@sntech.de \
    --cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
    --cc=jbx6244@gmail.com \
    --cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=kwilczynski@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
    --cc=mani@kernel.org \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=shawn.lin@rock-chips.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).