From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E0CE12741BC for ; Thu, 11 Dec 2025 13:53:53 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1765461235; cv=none; b=O2iwHkbEIRAoMYyCP00BJD11ZjJtQ2l6pwaK621Vu3EjWLsuRNunLrqonaoEjEEEHQVecMZw1hobbR6qTK+H9mSVbFfbVVh/JtNxWhkIYr4q1+CqHC2J3yH7VkFFeMFMnE26wgFXCO+oz0VV4i3xQVWAHC2wPB9fpmKqpk1gUN8= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1765461235; c=relaxed/simple; bh=LYD2rfspP100IOI672sCnFvj6NXG/HTHolcClNEFKeU=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=Y6CVGM3ebDmHpw9NhI0hVrD1lSaSgLYgMpBfiLbY67/u+VO7HUt0PWwatsjwuifzaFPJi0rMnyA+Sgay7cO8MLTi0yBnxVb3h4gh+86itRgSDm8QMkZGFu/PM4Df7xAxOZJr6kdnH6MSiy090jwpN9kK1BCwp1WGlT3qkgHeFww= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=iBHhNWj9; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="iBHhNWj9" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1765461234; x=1796997234; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to; bh=LYD2rfspP100IOI672sCnFvj6NXG/HTHolcClNEFKeU=; b=iBHhNWj91RDWlLV1ratja7qswvdzYaeUORZdu82eYHaFfdIqENK9dCpt f4t2guY3x7CFwFQ6rHc+VbT3C1Dpc3gXmePkPntKDetlpNMeCIAIKiMiL WBS0VyvGIA+NwnITHYXl+pv83/90WPfrNLFSUN0U3NuT55wPGxgDzMETf GKZArFsmP5+C1hryB3tetsCNCn9JT5tkBJQICZ0KS4JZ5LJJNX+ZGpSpp zC9MaP0TRiq4TCVijb6cIm+/6N+h7cYFSbWbmQ7CjqqYxQ8Nrm7wc5RZK WZ45Yg8U3HfyGl1Yke9eHD17o3TqKmVzCPs2BroKO9P2CIGhwaKVLcsqC Q==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: APpjd+iGQ1y0A12BD5G/7g== X-CSE-MsgGUID: 1M+e0HxZR7CinEPkwlVkrQ== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11639"; a="67490796" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.21,141,1763452800"; d="scan'208";a="67490796" Received: from fmviesa005.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.145]) by orvoesa110.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 11 Dec 2025 05:53:54 -0800 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: mAL+d2woSDW9yL8wnmlw6Q== X-CSE-MsgGUID: Sp2uWTIjR4aKISyN/BCprQ== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.21,141,1763452800"; d="scan'208";a="201230289" Received: from pgcooper-mobl3.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO localhost) ([10.245.244.250]) by fmviesa005-auth.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 11 Dec 2025 05:53:52 -0800 Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2025 15:53:50 +0200 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Ilpo =?iso-8859-1?Q?J=E4rvinen?= Cc: Guixin Liu , Bjorn Helgaas , linux-pci@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 1/2] PCI: Introduce named defines for pci rom Message-ID: References: <20251211033741.53072-1-kanie@linux.alibaba.com> <20251211033741.53072-2-kanie@linux.alibaba.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - c/o Alberga Business Park, 6 krs, Bertel Jungin Aukio 5, 02600 Espoo On Thu, Dec 11, 2025 at 11:33:07AM +0200, Ilpo Järvinen wrote: > On Thu, 11 Dec 2025, Guixin Liu wrote: ... > I know it's a bit work to rebase the second patch on top of this, but you > actually don't need to do it that way (you can just make changes to this > patch and then use git diff to produce the very same end result so you > don't need to resolve any rebase conflicts). Usually it is even easier than that with help of revert and interactive rebase. At least that's how I reshuffle changes between patches. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko