From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E4D8317A2F6; Tue, 30 Dec 2025 14:22:44 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1767104565; cv=none; b=GfcR8YOIwCEQKsQiqgmZueylCW806DCVMQ5T1Ghoxs/nnSt7PghpMl1CKPzYH7UUMBz9uYLYwSCZo1K+dGIO5xLjQecJyIsWuT+qHzZxb3/bjO4K/76/gccGAh2B2mqi04ZTkeCSyMe4WIuTSczop8/o6z7QoODytm9vOvGGPLE= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1767104565; c=relaxed/simple; bh=aDLjB01UK3jf7Dq8YDojKtYOpc32gM+BspVDOEkyfFc=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=beZz9yEyI0UdIYpltTIi2gUGr/tIfZsIix2cXBZdjrMtxAgERaapwrJxTnoinCQZvd8J2+PPBU6DKKVF0RHk9jM/F6TMxjOsSGa4qiBDYQWsi4ktfCqjH7f2Z1V1DvmoOlrnLYWSNUEQB+lzGlt+vf18vfJ6Gc1agfHON91Oq6g= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=eHrY1i2K; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="eHrY1i2K" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A4B1AC4CEFB; Tue, 30 Dec 2025 14:22:41 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1767104564; bh=aDLjB01UK3jf7Dq8YDojKtYOpc32gM+BspVDOEkyfFc=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=eHrY1i2KVVVwolDMtjU8QxJXXRcPMFsEsjLrzfH5PpSSJdKoey6Pl7NHAYgnZg0he v2QjvTLKdiqY1rO2BMhRl80FNLNwdLDPkCvs+7coSSC86jcbDv0QXUCEm/paKc/sdN 3BsLGwVimdUKUnl0utu5kxHwp/EP0Mc3A6b8K4G1VNblsW8WEHmZUdFzwiZzWUWiuR qa6G05nmL710k0W6Szg4gvQzyvRAk+l8dZhLp2WVczc+22aNadPoOxCNLIBJTdpkbs b1JU79mz96+JD+buCqYxsS1n4+U4B+8PQVNdvxT6rMIC3rOxDw7zmfk/BEPcb3QHAt MIVmN2kW848JA== Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2025 15:22:39 +0100 From: Niklas Cassel To: Qiang Yu Cc: Jingoo Han , Manivannan Sadhasivam , Lorenzo Pieralisi , Krzysztof =?utf-8?Q?Wilczy=C5=84ski?= , Rob Herring , Bjorn Helgaas , Heiko Stuebner , linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: dwc: Remove duplicate dw_pcie_ep_hide_ext_capability() function Message-ID: References: <20251224-remove_dw_pcie_ep_hide_ext_capability-v1-1-4302c9cdc316@oss.qualcomm.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20251224-remove_dw_pcie_ep_hide_ext_capability-v1-1-4302c9cdc316@oss.qualcomm.com> Hello Qiang Yu, On Wed, Dec 24, 2025 at 02:10:46AM -0800, Qiang Yu wrote: > Remove dw_pcie_ep_hide_ext_capability() and replace its usage with > dw_pcie_remove_ext_capability(). Both functions serve the same purpose > of hiding PCIe extended capabilities, but dw_pcie_remove_ext_capability() > provides a cleaner API that doesn't require the caller to specify the > previous capability ID. > > Compile-tested only. Runtime testing on RK3588 hardware would be > appreciated. This patch does not appy on top of pci/controller/dwc Anyway, I applied it manually, and tested, thus: Tested-by: Niklas Cassel