From: Xu Yilun <yilun.xu@linux.intel.com>
To: Li Ming <ming.li@zohomail.com>
Cc: dan.j.williams@intel.com, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
linux-coco@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] PCI/IDE: Fix using wrong VF ID for RID range calculation
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2026 10:30:14 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aWRctnwjEXvUyayb@yilunxu-OptiPlex-7050> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260111080631.506487-1-ming.li@zohomail.com>
On Sun, Jan 11, 2026 at 04:06:31PM +0800, Li Ming wrote:
> When allocate a new IDE stream for a pci device in SR-IOV case, the RID
> range of the new IDE stream should cover all VFs of the device. VF id
> range of a pci device is [0 - (num_VFs - 1)], so should use (num_VFs - )
> as the last VF's ID.
>
> Fixes: 1e4d2ff3ae45 ("PCI/IDE: Add IDE establishment helpers")
> Signed-off-by: Li Ming <ming.li@zohomail.com>
> ---
> drivers/pci/ide.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/ide.c b/drivers/pci/ide.c
> index 26f7cc94ec31..9629f3ceb213 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/ide.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/ide.c
> @@ -283,8 +283,8 @@ struct pci_ide *pci_ide_stream_alloc(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> /* for SR-IOV case, cover all VFs */
> num_vf = pci_num_vf(pdev);
> if (num_vf)
> - rid_end = PCI_DEVID(pci_iov_virtfn_bus(pdev, num_vf),
> - pci_iov_virtfn_devfn(pdev, num_vf));
> + rid_end = PCI_DEVID(pci_iov_virtfn_bus(pdev, num_vf - 1),
> + pci_iov_virtfn_devfn(pdev, num_vf - 1));
I don't have VF for test but I believe the change is correct.
The calculated rid_end will be passed to IDE RID association register values,
which is inclusive according to IDE SPEC.
void pci_ide_stream_to_regs(...)
{
...
regs->rid1 = FIELD_PREP(PCI_IDE_SEL_RID_1_LIMIT, settings->rid_end);
...
}
Is it better we clarify the kernel-doc a little bit:
--------8<--------
diff --git a/include/linux/pci-ide.h b/include/linux/pci-ide.h
index 2521a2914294..f0c6975fd429 100644
--- a/include/linux/pci-ide.h
+++ b/include/linux/pci-ide.h
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ enum pci_ide_partner_select {
/**
* struct pci_ide_partner - Per port pair Selective IDE Stream settings
* @rid_start: Partner Port Requester ID range start
- * @rid_end: Partner Port Requester ID range end
+ * @rid_end: Partner Port Requester ID range end (inclusive)
* @stream_index: Selective IDE Stream Register Block selection
* @mem_assoc: PCI bus memory address association for targeting peer partner
* @pref_assoc: PCI bus prefetchable memory address association for
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-01-12 2:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-01-11 8:06 [PATCH 1/1] PCI/IDE: Fix using wrong VF ID for RID range calculation Li Ming
2026-01-12 2:30 ` Xu Yilun [this message]
2026-01-13 13:44 ` Li Ming
2026-01-13 21:46 ` Bjorn Helgaas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aWRctnwjEXvUyayb@yilunxu-OptiPlex-7050 \
--to=yilun.xu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=linux-coco@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ming.li@zohomail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox