From: Niklas Cassel <cassel@kernel.org>
To: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>
Cc: "Jingoo Han" <jingoohan1@gmail.com>,
"Manivannan Sadhasivam" <mani@kernel.org>,
"Lorenzo Pieralisi" <lpieralisi@kernel.org>,
"Krzysztof Wilczyński" <kwilczynski@kernel.org>,
"Rob Herring" <robh@kernel.org>,
"Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
"Krishna Chaitanya Chundru" <krishna.chundru@oss.qualcomm.com>,
"Randolph Lin" <randolph@andestech.com>,
"Samuel Holland" <samuel.holland@sifive.com>,
"Frank Li" <Frank.Li@nxp.com>,
"Charles Mirabile" <cmirabil@redhat.com>,
tim609@andestech.com, "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@orcam.me.uk>,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 4/4] PCI: dwc: Fix missing iATU setup when ECAM is enabled
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2026 16:02:49 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aXjTmX6R2f4bZNgN@fedora> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7fd4fced-86c0-4fe9-843e-60a30a9b74a9@kernel.org>
On Sat, Jan 24, 2026 at 05:53:36AM +1100, Damien Le Moal wrote:
> On 2026/01/24 5:28, Niklas Cassel wrote:
> > From: Krishna Chaitanya Chundru <krishna.chundru@oss.qualcomm.com>
> >
> > When ECAM is enabled, the driver skipped calling dw_pcie_iatu_setup()
> > before configuring ECAM iATU entries. This left IO and MEM outbound
> > windows unprogrammed, resulting in broken IO transactions. Additionally,
> > dw_pcie_config_ecam_iatu() was only called during host initialization,
> > so ECAM-related iATU entries were not restored after suspend/resume,
> > leading to failures in configuration space access
> >
> > To resolve these issues, the ECAM iATU configuration is moved into
> > dw_pcie_iatu_setup(), and dw_pcie_iatu_setup() is invoked when ECAM is
> > enabled.
> >
> > Furthermore, error checks are added in dw_pcie_prog_outbound_atu() and
> > dw_pcie_prog_inbound_atu() such that an error is returned if trying to
> > program an iATU that is outside the number of iATUs provided by the
> > controller.
> >
> > Fixes: f6fd357f7afb ("PCI: dwc: Prepare the driver for enabling ECAM mechanism using iATU 'CFG Shift Feature'")
> > Reported-by: Maciej W. Rozycki <macro@orcam.me.uk>
> > Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/alpine.DEB.2.21.2511280256260.36486@angie.orcam.me.uk/
> > Signed-off-by: Krishna Chaitanya Chundru <krishna.chundru@oss.qualcomm.com>
> > Co-developed-by: Niklas Cassel <cassel@kernel.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Niklas Cassel <cassel@kernel.org>
>
> It looks like this patch depends on patch 3, which does not have a Fixes tag. So
> why not squash together patches 3 and 4 ?
I think it would be wrong to squash the patches.
This patch is mostly written by Krishna, and I think it is wrong to squash
a cleanup patch with a fix patch.
It is okay to have a fix patch that is done on top of a cleanup patch.
(It would require a lot more effort to write a fix without the cleanup
having been done first.)
Therefore, I will simply add:
Cc: stable+noautosel@kernel.org # depends on Clean up iATU index usage in dw_pcie_iatu_setup()
Such that stable will see that this patch requires a small dependency.
Kind regards,
Niklas
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-01-27 15:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-01-23 18:28 [PATCH v4 0/4] PCI: dwc: Clean up iATU index mess Niklas Cassel
2026-01-23 18:28 ` [PATCH v4 1/4] PCI: dwc: Fix msg_atu_index assignment Niklas Cassel
2026-01-23 18:46 ` Damien Le Moal
2026-01-23 18:28 ` [PATCH v4 2/4] PCI: dwc: Improve msg_atu_index error handling Niklas Cassel
2026-01-23 18:50 ` Damien Le Moal
2026-01-27 15:03 ` Niklas Cassel
2026-01-23 18:28 ` [PATCH v4 3/4] PCI: dwc: Clean up iATU index usage in dw_pcie_iatu_setup() Niklas Cassel
2026-01-23 18:28 ` [PATCH v4 4/4] PCI: dwc: Fix missing iATU setup when ECAM is enabled Niklas Cassel
2026-01-23 18:53 ` Damien Le Moal
2026-01-27 15:02 ` Niklas Cassel [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aXjTmX6R2f4bZNgN@fedora \
--to=cassel@kernel.org \
--cc=Frank.Li@nxp.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=cmirabil@redhat.com \
--cc=dlemoal@kernel.org \
--cc=jingoohan1@gmail.com \
--cc=krishna.chundru@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=kwilczynski@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
--cc=macro@orcam.me.uk \
--cc=mani@kernel.org \
--cc=randolph@andestech.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=samuel.holland@sifive.com \
--cc=tim609@andestech.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox